Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A concrete hockey puck the size of a small house

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 11:55 AM
Original message
A concrete hockey puck the size of a small house
radius 15', height 10', and a concave bottom would weigh, after subtracting the water it displaces, about 300 tons.

Dredging barges are capable of lifting about 100 tons. If three barges were employed to plop said puck down on top of leaky well, would this not at least mitigate spillage until relief wells are drilled?

DU engineers? Anyone? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Supposedly there is around 1000' of silt and mud on the Gulf floor
Before reaching bedrock, so the crude oil and gas might still be able to escape through the porous, but now compressed mud underneath any 300T block. JMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Better idea:
If dropping a heavy object is any sort of solution, and I'm not sure it is.

Lower a mostly empty cylinder with a bottom, but also with the sides extending below the bottom over the BOP.

The extended sides would eventually push into the sea bed around the BOP, maybe 30 feet or further.

Radius 30-60', overall height 60'.

Then, begin to fill the open upward end of the cylinder with hydralic concrete or any material that is very dense and can be pumped.

This way, the restriction of 100 tons isn't an issue.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. that was pretty much the concept of the first top hat
with the exception of filling it with concrete instead of pumping out of it. Not a clue if it would work or not, I'm in no way an engineer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. True, except that Top Hat was going to allow continued extraction.
And the crystallizing methane hydrates prevented that from working, so they quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. correct. Every attempt to date has involved saving the well head
first, not stopping the spill at any cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yep, even the current LMRP and the other option, "BOP on BOP".
I questioned this weeks ago.

Makes me fell ill.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I like it NYC_SKP
If your cylinder is pushing down into sediment harder than 10,000 psi at any given point the well is sealed. It would have to happen relatively fast, before the oil had a chance to find an avenue around the edges.

Sometimes it seems either these guys aren't capable of thinking outside the box, or they are only considering options which will preserve their goddamn well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. If a 15'-radius cylinder is constructed from 1" steel plate
only about 6.75 ft2 of steel (the rim of the cylinder) would be supporting the weight. 600 tons of concrete poured on top would cause it would sink until the silt/steel boundary had reached a pressure of over 1,200 psi, more than enough to seal the well.

An assumption would be that the density of the seafloor was relatively uniform, and I don't know whether that's a valid one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. The planet saving diaphragm makes sense to me
if you can figure out a way for BP to profit from it they just may try it! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. If this were a good idea it wouldn't have been plan 9.
just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Yeah.. we're in ACME territory now...
Next they are going to strap a rocket to the Coyote and see if he can blast the leak to the moon..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lets say the static pressure at the wellhead is 10,000 psi.
Some estimates are ten times that, but whatever.


Radius of 15'. 180 inches. Pie are round, err, square. R = 90 inches. R squared = 8100. So that X 3.14159 = 25,443 sq inches.


25,443 sq inches X 10,000 pounds each = a tad over a quarter billion pounds or 127,000 tons of force. So make your block come up to the surface (~4250 feet above the sea floor) and it will work as long as there is no pressure fluctuations that make it burp.


The forces involved here are unimaginable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. great sig photo
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Suggestion is Not Bad
in that it seems like a heavier version of the top hat. The added weight would make it easier to overcome the forces that caused the top hat to fail.

My first concern would be with controlling such a large object a mile underwater. There were cables used for the top hat -- would much stronger cables be immediately available in lengths of 5000 feet?

And would there be difficulties with controlling the position of a larger object that far below the surface?

I don't know from an engineering point of view, but those were the questions that immediately came to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. The oil would blow out around the bottom in the soft sediment. Just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. and a very good guess
well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC