Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How's That Deficit Commission Working Out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Project Grudge Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 12:10 AM
Original message
How's That Deficit Commission Working Out?
"Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) are striding onto the dark and bloody ground of tax policy...

Wyden-Gregg would reduce the number of income-tax brackets to three—15, 25, and 35 percent—and would cut the corporate tax rate, currently the second highest in the industrial world (it is lower than Japan’s), to 24 percent. More than 95 percent of small businesses—those with gross annual receipts of less than $1 million, which are crucial to creating jobs—would be allowed to expense all equipment and inventory costs in a single year...

Also, Wyden-Gregg would encourage personal saving in a nation in which almost a third of all households have no retirement savings. It would enable a married couple to contribute up to $14,000 a year to tax-favored retirement and savings accounts."

Link To The Newsweek Column

------------------------------------------
I'm not interested in the actual article, it's just your run-of-the-mill George Will garbage. However, if this is really the policy being considered then I know why Senator Gregg would say "'there is no philosophical push-back' against the proposal on the GOP side." Is this what's considered bi-partisan in the Senate?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ugh. Wyden.
That would have told me right from the gate it would be shit. He is horrible at financial policy.

Cut taxes for corporations and raise them to 15% for the lowest income. Who can put $14,000 a year in a retirement account? And isn't the highest tax bracket 35% now?? What happened to repealing the Bush tax cuts?

This is like the Bush tax cuts on steroids.

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Project Grudge Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed
When I first read about the $14,000 a year retirement account, I thought to myself people already have IRAs and 401K plans. This is just an old idea that's been repackaged. But as you point out, the problem is lack of income, not having enough places to put it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC