Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question for whoever claims Petraeus is a good pick for McChrystal's position

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mathilda Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:44 PM
Original message
Question for whoever claims Petraeus is a good pick for McChrystal's position
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 01:45 PM by Mathilda
Did you suggest that Petraeus should have been the pick before Obama picked him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is your point?
Why would any of us have had enough knowledge of those eligible to be named that we would have suggested ANYONE? Hell we didn't even know if MCC was out or not. What is your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mathilda Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am just making sure
That this is not a Kagan-is-awesome-because-Obama-picked-her scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. and it would matter how in the larger scheme? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think O had an untenable situation and made the best possible
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 01:53 PM by hlthe2b
choices--both to neuter criticism, reassure allies, and maintain continuity on at least the short term. Now that is a long way from saying that I am confident Petraeus is THE MAN to bring this debacle to an end. He might be, given he's putting his reputation on the line for what seems like a hopeless situation. Or maybe not. But, I can see the strategic value in picking Petraeus and I will give Obama a few kudos for that. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Totally fair question IMHO
Im also a little disturbed at how satisfied some people are with this move, when the real move should be to get the fuck out of Afghanistan.

We don't need a change of drapes and a new media makeover on this failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. you still have to put someone in that position...
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 01:57 PM by hlthe2b
Did you really expect Obama to step on the podium, state he's canned MCC, but that he's expecting the troops in Afghanistan to begin packing it in, effective immediately, sans new leadership, as NATO allies stand there with their mouths wide open? Is that the scenario you thought would happen? Hell, I want us out of Afghanistan as soon as we possibly can, but I am realistic about it. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. "Is that the scenario you thought would happen"
No. This is what I expected to happen, though I prefer your scenario.

Our NATO allies wouldn't wait around too long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think anybody here thinks he's a good pick
but since Stupid fired anyone who wasn't a loyalist, there's just not a hell of a lot left to pick from.

However, if he's able to do the same job without infuriating Afghans and allies, he might be a minor improvement.

No loyalist to the last administration is going to be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Obama can bring a retiree back to active duty eom
He can bring back Wes Clark if he wants to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd prefer Wes Clark
or someone with his philosophy. But as far as the situation goes, Petraeus is a good political pick and can implement the strategy, whether I agree with the strategy or not. It's not like we were going to start withdrawing next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Gen. Clark's philosophy while he wore the uniform was
to go in with all of the power you had,
and if fighting a war, fight to win it.....
if the war is deemed unwinnable, then leave...but be careful on how you do it.

I think that is what we are currently doing in Afghanistan,
giving this last one go, and if we can't win, we will be leaving.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. He had better political skills
I can't imagine Clark asking how he got jerked into attended a NATO dinner or otherwise disrespecting the people he was helping or needed to help him. I wouldn't want the guy described in the article on my local police dept, let alone a general running a war. That's the part I'm talking about. Running around propping up Karzai and condemning Senators who were trying to figure out how to resolve an election impasse and dissatisfaction with obvious corruption. What the fuck is that? I just think Clark has more respect for foreign relations than that. More generals need to.

As far as the military strategy, yes, fight a war to win. But if it's not worth the last soldier, than it's not worth the first one. The time to decide that is when you commit, which has already been done. I read that they're taking a calmer approach in Kandahar, just moving in a few blocks at a time rather than kicking doors down and raiding the place. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fucking Betrayus. The only one who could ahve been a worse pick
than McCHrystal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Did it really matter who was piloting the Titanic after it started taking water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Of course not
Much ado about nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. isn't this a step down for petraeus?
isn't being in charge of centcom more prestigious? after all, he already did his thing in iraq. now he's asked to go back into battle to do the same in afghanistan? doesn't seem like a step up to me unless it's interim.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Isn't he still in charge of centcom?
I don't know that he has done anything but accepted more responsibilities? Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. It is a step down. Petraeus is now the CG CFC-A and there will be a new
CentCom commander above Petraeus.

I know a lot of people here down like Petraeus, but this is the most selfless act a four star general can preform. Giving up a higher command to take a lower one because the President asked you to. CentCom isn't an easy command but it is a lot more comfortable than being CG Afghanistan. Petraeus is going back into the fight after thinking his time was over and he would retire in a couple years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwrguy Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Clark or Shinseki should get the job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Clark hasn't worn the uniform in nearly 10 years.
I think Shinseki is retired as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwrguy Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. retired but technically in the reserve
He can be brought back if the President wills it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I think Patreus is more familiar with the situation,
and although Iraq was an outrageous war,
it is nearly over, and part of the reason
is what Patreus was able to do; turn an impossible situation
into a fairly manageable one.
I'll give credit when and if credit is due....
rather than stick to my lines just because their my lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Not a good idea. Both are not familiar with the COIN strategy being imployed and
there are a bunch of younger generals who could do it better than them. Also in the military you promote up, not off of the senior tour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC