Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Europeans Press Wolfowitz to Quit as Bank Chief (the blivet is out of options)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:01 AM
Original message
NYT: Europeans Press Wolfowitz to Quit as Bank Chief (the blivet is out of options)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/11/washington/11wolfowitz.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Europeans Press Wolfowitz to Quit as Bank Chief


By STEVEN R. WEISMAN
Published: May 11, 2007

WASHINGTON, May 10 — European leaders have told the Bush administration that Paul D. Wolfowitz must resign as president of the World Bank in order to avoid a vote next week by the bank’s board declaring that he no longer has its confidence to function as the bank’s leader, European officials said Thursday.

The officials said the board was drafting a resolution reflecting its view that the relationship between Mr. Wolfowitz and the governing body of the bank had “broken beyond repair.” They noted that, if he remained in office, some European countries were planning to reduce contributions to the World Bank that would aid poor countries and instead would channel the money to European agencies and other groups for distribution.

“The administration has been told that its battle to save Wolfowitz cannot be won,” said a European official, who like others who discussed the matter spoke on the condition of anonymity because the matter is confidential. “His relationship with the board is not only damaged. It is broken.”

Bank officials say that the growing determination to oust Mr. Wolfowitz has led to a polling of the 24 members of the bank board and that a majority favor his ouster.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Progressive_In_NC Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Must get back to bribery and malfeasance already in progress
This is what happens when you try to address the corruption at the World Bank. I don't like Wolfowitz one Iota, but he tried to get some of the glad handing to stop. They got rid of him quick (although it sounds like he deserves it).

This is an interesting read to say the least:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010050

snip
=============================================
Mark Malloch Brown spoke Monday to a crowded auditorium at the World Bank's headquarters, warning that the bank's mission was "hugely at risk" as long as Paul Wolfowitz remained its president. Only hours earlier, news leaked that a special committee investigating Mr. Wolfowitz had accused him of violating conflict-of-interest rules. A coincidence? We doubt it.

Mr. Malloch Brown, remember, was until last year Kofi Annan's deputy at the United Nations. In that position, he distinguished himself by spinning away the $100 billion Oil for Food scandal as little more than a blip in the U.N.'s good work, and one that had little to do with Mr. Annan himself.
=============================================

snip
============================================
The bank presidency would be a neat coup for Sir Mark, and not just because the post has heretofore gone to an American. He also stands for everything Mr. Wolfowitz opposes, beginning with the issue of corruption. Consider Mr. Malloch Brown's defense of the U.N.'s procurement practices.

"Not a penny was lost from the organization," he insisted last year, following an audit of the U.N.'s peacekeeping procurement by its Office of Internal Oversight Services. In fact, the office found that $7 million had been lost from overpayment; $50 million worth of contracts showed indications of bid rigging; $61 million had bypassed U.N. rules; $82 million had been lost to mismanagement; and $110 million had "insufficient" justification. That's $310 million out of a budget of $1.6 billion, and who knows what the auditors missed.
=============================================

Now back to regularly schedule raping of third world companies already in progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Any 'facts' from the WSJ editorial team must be treated with suspicion
The main purpose of that piece is to attack George Soros, as part of the general right-wing demonization of him. Wihtout links, what they say can't be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wow. This whole Soap Opera
is breathtaking in its sickness.

These people are really living in a world of delusion. I've seen some recent photos of Paul, and this thing is really wearing him down. In fact, he looks mentally deranged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Expect a Friday evening news dump
adios to Wolfowitz and his 'neoconcubine' (read that somewhere here last night) :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC