Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WOW! Kos to sue Research 2000 for fraudulent polling results!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 12:39 PM
Original message
WOW! Kos to sue Research 2000 for fraudulent polling results!
Edited on Tue Jun-29-10 12:40 PM by berni_mccoy
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/6/29/880185/-More-on-Research-2000

I have just published a report by three statistics wizards showing, quite convincingly, that the weekly Research 2000 State of the Nation poll we ran the past year and a half was likely bunk.

Since the moment Mark Grebner, Michael Weissman, and Jonathan Weissman approached me, I took their concerns seriously and cooperated fully with their investigation. I also offered to run the results on Daily Kos provided that they 1) fully documented each claim in detail, 2) got that documentation peer reviewed by disinterested third parties, and 3) gave Research 2000 an opportunity to respond. By the end of last week, they had accomplished the first two items on that list. I held publication of the report until today, because I didn't want to partake in a cliche Friday Bad News Dump. This is serious business, and I wasn't going to bury it over a weekend.

We contracted with Research 2000 to conduct polling and to provide us with the results of their surveys. Based on the report of the statisticians, it's clear that we did not get what we paid for. We were defrauded by Research 2000, and while we don't know if some or all of the data was fabricated or manipulated beyond recognition, we know we can't trust it. Meanwhile, Research 2000 has refused to offer any explanation. Early in this process, I asked for and they offered to provide us with their raw data for independent analysis -- which could potentially exculpate them. That was two weeks ago, and despite repeated promises to provide us that data, Research 2000 ultimately refused to do so. At one point, they claimed they couldn't deliver them because their computers were down and they had to work out of a Kinkos office. Research 2000 was delivered a copy of the report early Monday morning, and though they quickly responded and promised a full response, once again the authors of the report heard nothing more.
...



Much more at the link. Now THAT is some naked honesty and bare transparency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Was it incompetence at Research 2000 or worse?
Is R2K an arm of Rasmussen and a secret RW polling outfit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Based on their reluctance to hand over the raw data....
I'd say it was not negligence, but intent. But that is just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Good old fashioned fraud.
The statistical analysis that triggered this showed patterns that indicated that the numbers were not from random sources, but from people trying to imitate randomness, which means that R2k had people just making the numbers up instead of doing actual polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like Research 2000 is some company based out of a kids basement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, I'd say Reseach 2000's credibility just went
bye-bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. kicking
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. We May Learn More Than The Pollsters Would Like...
I was/am a regular reader of the polls on DKos and 538...and this definitely was a surprise considering how much trust Kos had put in Research 2000.

This was a bold move...and maybe one that could open the door to the dark underside of the polling biz...how they can extrapolate and skew numbers and why they do it. It'll be interesting if the "methodology" and the results really do jive. We may learn that the entire polling game is rigged (as if we didn't need much to prove that about Rasmussen) and may even answer some critical questions as to why a candidate appears to be doing well in polling or in "exit" polling and then loses the general by a large margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC