Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney: "When we ran, nobody had any idea that 9/11 was going to happen"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:23 AM
Original message
Cheney: "When we ran, nobody had any idea that 9/11 was going to happen"

http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2007/05/cheney_to_fox_n.html#more

<snip>

QUESTION: Six in ten Americans say they feel it was a mistake to go to war. About as many say they think it’s hopeless on the ground. And then you had a group of moderate Republicans at the White House who said they delivered a frank message that they are really worried about the future of the Republican Party after this – how the war is going. What do you say to those people?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, what I say and I know what the President says is that we were elected to do a job and to do what we think is right for the country. When we ran, nobody had any idea that 9/11 was going to happen just a few months later or that we would be faced with the kinds of problems that we’re faced with now, in effect a worldwide conflict that has seen attacks not only in New York and Washington, but in London, in Madrid, in Istanbul and all the way around the world; an al Qaeda organization that’s still very active today trying to marshal the resources and acquire the weapons to launch further attacks against the United States. We’ve been enormously successful at defending the country for the last five and a half years against another one of those attacks. It doesn’t mean there won’t be more attacks. There may well be.

But the things we’ve done, sometimes unpopular such as aggressively get involved in the Middle East with military force or set up a terrorist surveillance program at home that allows us to monitor communications between Americans and people overseas at suspect phone numbers or the controversy over the detainee program and how we interrogate prisoners. So I got labeled under that, obviously, because I stood up and defended the importance of that program. It’s been absolutely vital.

We didn’t get elected to be popular. We didn’t get elected to worry just about the fate of the Republican Party. Our mission is to do everything we can to prevail on what is now, we believe, a global conflict, a fundamental test of the character of the American people, whether or not we’re going to be able to prevail against one of the most evil opponents we’ve ever faced. And on our watch, we’re going to do absolutely everything we can to see to it that we do succeed and that we do prevail in that conflict, and sometimes that means that we don’t do well in the polls or people want to be critical. That’s their prerogative. But we sit there every morning and read the intelligence reports in the Oval Office and we know what’s happening out there. We know how committed our adversaries are to try to get at us. And we’ve done what we thought was right for the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. except the PNAC
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Beat me to it. Been planned since when.... 1997?
Tweety briefly mentioned PNAC the other day, and I thought maybe some of it would finally come out.

Why don't Keith, Tweety, Colbert, etc start talking about PNAC??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. death threats?
Edited on Fri May-11-07 09:35 AM by GTRMAN
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Possible. I'd really like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. well it's funny to me
that no one seems to want to touch it.


"the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor"

that right there just seems to be too big of a coincidence, especially when I remember hearing the media apeing the "Pearl Harbor" meme over and over right after 9-11. Makes me think much of the media is complicit and the reat is threatened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. What do you think would be the result if it *did* become news and suddenly
the whole citizenry is aware and KNOWS that sentence you just quoted?

Do you think they would collectively yawn and go back to IDOL, or .....?

Sometimes I think if it became known people would explode, and other times.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. if it was spelled out to them
and they did yawn and go back to American Idol, I'd have to say they deserve every damn thing that has happened and will happen to them in the future.

Unfortunately, we are along for the ride :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Suntext: "When we ran nobody had any idea how we were going to screw America!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. bullsh*t n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. wow..they are busy busy busy shaping that end game reality
LOL

"...or the controversy over the detainee program and how we interrogate prisoners"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. "We didn’t get elected to be popular. " Mission accomplished!

Approval ratings continue to dive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sure Dick, we believe you! NOT
Edited on Fri May-11-07 09:31 AM by BridgeTheGap
I'm heartened to hear that Dick doesn't care about the fate of the Repub party.
Still nothing on what, exactly, Iraq had to do with 9/11, probably because they didn't have anything to do with it.
If you're reading the intelligence reports, why can't you see how you have emboldened the terrorists by invading a country that had nothing to do with 9/11?
You choose to ignore the will of the American people at your own peril!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. You and George knew, I call bullshit.
Someday the dominoes are all going to fall and the truth will come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Sadly,
the same thing has been said about the assassinations of the 1960s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. Except you and your friends
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hey Dick! Richard Clarke did!
But you and your asshole boss didn't want to listen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. hey, i sussed some truth in his statement ...
"When we ran..."

they had adequate warning of attacks pre-Sept 11. The chicken-heart cowards ran from the responsibity to protect the US, or else were complicit in allowing it to happen.

your choice Dick.
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. what a sick SOB
this comment tells it all, they do not care about anyone but themselves and they do not care about their party, just the PNAC agenda, we have some sick sick criminals running this government, is it revolution time yet??????????

We didn’t get elected to be popular. We didn’t get elected to worry just about the fate of the Republican Party. Our mission is to do everything we can to prevail on what is now, we believe, a global conflict, a fundamental test of the character of the American people, whether or not we’re going to be able to prevail against one of the most evil opponents we’ve ever faced. And on our watch, we’re going to do absolutely everything we can to see to it that we do succeed and that we do prevail in that conflict, and sometimes that means that we don’t do well in the polls or people want to be critical. That’s their prerogative. But we sit there every morning and read the intelligence reports in the Oval Office and we know what’s happening out there. We know how committed our adversaries are to try to get at us. And we’ve done what we thought was right for the country.


This is bush/cheney's crusade, and they take that word "prevail" and shove it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. well he's half right when he said, "We didn’t get elected to be popular"
true, they did not get elected. And they're not really popular either. And they had warnings of 9/11, so he's wrong about that too.

And what the hell does Iraq have to do with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bullshit. I predicted it in September 2000 - an 'event' leading to war in the Middle East.
Some things are clearly predictable ... not many ... but with greedy global corporatists it's a "slam dunk."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
21. Cheney doesn't see it as lying.
Edited on Fri May-11-07 10:13 AM by CJCRANE
To him it's "creating reality".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. some success
"We’ve been enormously successful at defending the country for the last five and a half years against another one of those attacks. It doesn’t mean there won’t be more attacks."


Huh? The number of Terror attacks worldwide has INCREASED dramatically since they started their "defense" of this country. Worse they have killed more Americans as a direct result of the war than died on 9/11. Even worse they failed to capture or stop the two main Terror events of that year The Antharax killer, Bin Laden. But the absolute worst is the shear number of dead Iraqi people that have died due to Terror attacks that are a result of the destablization of their country by this man. He's done an enormous job at getting people killed by Terrorist. FU DICK!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
23. "We were specifically told it would happen on 9/12."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
24. Then the lightning speed at which you were able to capitalize on it
to achieve the PNAC's goals is even more remarkable, Dick. And improbable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. hey dick head what are you planning for the american people this time
Edited on Fri May-11-07 01:20 PM by alyce douglas
do you know something we don't know???

"We’ve been enormously successful at defending the country for the last five and a half years against another one of those attacks. It doesn’t mean there won’t be more attacks. There may well be." .....dick cheney.



he knows something.....sigh, we need to remove ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. "We didn’t get elected . . . " -- Cheney.
A little truth if you chop the sentence a bit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yeah they did Dick, you just didn't read the Hart Rudman report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. that link doesn't seem to be working, I would like to send this
article to my Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC