Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Barbara Lee expresses party unity as she praises those who voted for defeated Iraq measure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:59 PM
Original message
Rep. Barbara Lee expresses party unity as she praises those who voted for defeated Iraq measure
Edited on Fri May-11-07 01:01 PM by bigtree

Lee Praises Strong Support for Withdrawal Proposal

WASHINGTON - As the House took its first up-or-down vote on the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Oakland) characterized the vote as “historic” and the vote in favor of withdrawal as “strong.” While defeat of the measure – which was similar to a proposal to “fully fund withdrawal” drafted by Lee – was expected, it drew far more support than was widely anticipated. The final vote was 171-255.

“This was an historic vote and the strong showing in favor of redeploying our troops was a turning point. While this measure was defeated today, it will prevail,” she said.

The following are her remarks from the floor during debate (as delivered): http://lee.house.gov/index.cfm?ContentID=1040&ParentID=0&SectionID=4&SectionTree=4&lnk=b&ItemID=1035

“Thank you, Mister Speaker and let me thank Chairman Obey, first of all, for your strong and determined effort and your diligent effort to end this war and also I want to thank the gentleman from Massachusetts, Mr. McGovern, for offering this bill.

“HR 2237, it does reflect the goals, the goals, of what we called the ‘Lee Amendment,’ which was sponsored by Congresswomen Waters, Woosley, Watson and Congresswoman Clark.

“But let me tell you, the goal of this bill, as the goal of the Lee Amendment, really is an effort to fully fund the safe and timely redeployment of our troops from Iraq. It is responsible, it is practical, it does not cut the funding, but it designates what the supplemental can be used for, and that is to fully fund a safe withdrawal and redeployment and help the Iraqis stabilize their country, with a diplomatic, social and reconstruction effort.

“Members of Congress now have a choice between standing with the president or the American people who want an end to this occupation or the President, as I said, who wants an open-ended commitment to this failed policy.

“History will record that this war was a deadly mistake. History will document the damage that is has already done to our security and the security of the world, just as it already records the case for the war as fraudulent, something that we all would have known, had the house approved my amendment in 2002, that would have allowed the United Nation’s inspectors to finish their job.

“One day history will record that this unnecessary occupation ended. What remains to be seen is when it will end and at what cost in lives, in treasure, in what cost to our security and the security of those of the world.

“For those members who recognize that the President’s policy is a failure but are concerned about voting to end this failed policy and to redeploy our troops, I have a question for you. At what point will you be comfortable with that vote? When the death toll hits five thousand or ten thousand?

“Please vote for this! Please vote to end this occupation and bring our young men and women home. Please stop the death.”

Video of the floor statement is available here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3fj20FYCOU

http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/0510-13.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. kcik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cults4Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. have this vote bi-weekly!
We have a bad week or two in Iraq.. we might just be able to get them out sooner... that sounds awful but no worse than the wait till Sept so Petreaus can tell us we should leave after the oil theft bill is signed, claptrap.

I am very suprised at how much support was there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry Barbara, I know you're trying to put a brave face on it
But 59 Dem no votes is not my idea of party unity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's would be mpre than a shame, and amazingly duplicitous
if she wasn't give credit for her sincerity in this statement as she was given in her earlier effort to amend the compromise withdrawal bill.

I'm certain she was referring to the 170 or so votes in favor of the initiative. They reportedly expected only about 120.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bingo! And now, the 59 will figure out where the wind blows and will come around
plus maybe even some GOP-ers worried about re-election will join the winning side. This voting has to be repeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC