Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon restricting testimony in Congress - The Boston Globe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:35 PM
Original message
Pentagon restricting testimony in Congress - The Boston Globe
WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon has placed unprecedented restrictions on who can testify before Congress, reserving the right to bar lower-ranking officers, enlisted soldiers, and career bureaucrats from appearing before oversight committees or having their remarks transcribed, according to Defense Department documents.

Robert L. Wilkie , a former Bush administration national security official who left the White House to become assistant secretary of defense for legislative affairs last year, has outlined a half-dozen guidelines that prohibit most officers below the rank of colonel from appearing in hearings, restricting testimony to high-ranking officers and civilians appointed by President Bush.

The guidelines, described in an April 19 memo to the staff director of the House Armed Services Committee, adds that all field-level officers and enlisted personnel must be "deemed appropriate" by the Department of Defense before they can participate in personal briefings for members of Congress or their staffs; in addition, according to the memo, the proceedings must not be recorded.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/05/10/pentagon_restricting_testimony_in_congress?mode=PF


_________________________

Since when is the Pentagon a co-equal branch of government that can tell who and who can not testify before congress? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's part of the Executive Branch after all.
So if Bush wants it to have super duper government powers then until someone says differently... (shrug)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's such bullshit
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Time for a Grand Jury
Did we learn nothing from the pricks working for Ken Starr during the Clinton administration? Sounds like it's time to convene a grand jury -- which can subpoena anybody. No cross-examination, no lawyers. And, of course, the testimony would not be leaked . . . THAT would be illegal!

Keep those subpoenas rolling, O House of Representatives!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kick
I had to run after posting this, but think it is important to kick. I dont like the idea the Pentagon having rights to restrict who can and can not testify before congress. I have never heard of this before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. double kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm so thankful we're such a free country.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. If you haven't yet fully politicized an organization ...
... the only way to make sure you control the flow of information is to gag all but "loyal Bushies." This reeks of politicization of the Defense Department, and I have a hard to seeing it as legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC