Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Overseas military spending comes under congressional scrutiny

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 05:36 AM
Original message
Overseas military spending comes under congressional scrutiny
http://www.stripes.com/polopoly_fs/1.111782.1279717712!/image/1657362801.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_240/1657362801.jpg

An F-16 Fighting Falcon takes off from Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany. Against the backdrop of a runaway national deficit and massive increases in defense spending, several lawmakers are calling for the elimination of one Air Force fighter wing overseas, one Army Brigade Combat Team in Europe and two reinforced Marine Corps infantry battalions in Asia.


Overseas military spending comes under congressional scrutiny
By John Vandiver
Stars and Stripes
Published: July 21, 2010

STUTTGART, Germany — As the Army’s transformation in Europe moves forward, with a string of base closures planned in the year ahead, a group of lawmakers has launched a campaign to further cut the U.S. military presence in Europe and Asia.

Against the backdrop of a burgeoning national deficit and years of massive increases in defense spending, the restructuring plan meant to save taxpayers $80 billion in overseas military spending has reignited the debate in Congress over the future of U.S. military bases abroad.

“I do not think we should be spending money to have troops in Germany 65 years after World War II. We have a terrible deficit and we have to cut back,” said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass, who is spearheading a House effort to cut defense spending. “NATO was a wonderful concept. But 61 years later, I think it’s time to say our western European allies should be on their own. We’ll cooperate with them, but we shouldn’t be subsidizing their defense.”

Frank and several other lawmakers are calling for the elimination of one Air Force fighter wing overseas, one Army brigade combat team in Europe and two reinforced Marine Corps infantry battalions in Okinawa as part of a proposal to shave $1 trillion from defense spending worldwide over the next 10 years. The plan also would curtail spending on many expensive weapons systems. Frank hopes the recommendations will be included in next year’s Deficit Reduction Plan, which is being drafted by an 18-member commission assembled by President Barack Obama and has a Dec. 1 deadline.


House Democrats also held a congressional oversight panel hearing Tuesday on “rethinking our defense budget.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bring them all (including families for those on accompanied tours),
shut down the bases, bring home all the equipment that is feasible to transport and sell the rest at a 'yard sale'.

Saves a butt load of money on lease payments, puts a butt load of money in the local economies when the troops/families are relocated to bases in the US.

Allows for downsizing via normal attrition as enlistments expire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC