|
I'm not an expert on the Holocaust or anything involving it, I just researched this once to try to figure out what the deniers were claiming. So anyone who disagrees with specific points should probably be believed over me.
Deniers usually blame the Allies for the deaths. Since we destroyed Germany's ability to feed and care for the prisoners, it's our fault. Some argue that we took too long getting to the camps, so people died after we basically annihilated the Nazis but before we got to the camps to care for the prisoners. They also claim the Allies greatly exaggerated the numbers of dead, labeling anyone who was missing at the end of the war as a victim of the Holocaust. All of this was to justify our bombings of civilian targets and the massive slaughter of troops and civilians in Germany.
Kind of like the American Civil War--if all of those people were slaughtered just to prevent the Confederacy from seceding, many would claim it was not worth it. If the war was to free the slaves, then the cost was worth it. So northerners claim the war was about slavery, and southerners claim it was about secession and state's rights. We have the same battle over Iraq, and how much of a monster they can make Hussein, to justify Bush's invasion.
We claim that Hitler invaded France without provocation and in violation of treaty, but a Hitler defender would claim that the Allies had violated the treaty first, and Hitler was pre-emptively attacking an enemy he thought was going to attack him. So that same Hitler defender would argue that the Allies were not as morally superior as they claim in the start of the war, and that both sides were trying to destroy the other. Thus, at the end, the Allies had to justify the millions dead and make Hitler the clear bad guy. So, they had piles of bodies at these camps from the neglect at the end of the war--clearly thousands upon thousands. From those, they created a myth of millions upon millions deliberately murdered, rather than dying as a tragic consequence to a war the Allies had been willing participants in. At the same time, the Jews wanted Israel, so the myth was extended to make the Jews the victims of a persecution so extreme that their conquest of Palestine was justified.
That's not the way I would describe what happened, I'm putting it in a Denier's perspective. Similar to those who try to argue that someone other than Oswald killed JFK, they ignore clear evidence, and look for discrepancies or other interpretations of the evidence, or they look for ways to raise doubts about the official story. Keep in mind that we aren't talking about one event on film somewhere, but we are trying to analyze a series of events that happened over ten years, in many countries, under many different commanders, most of whom had varying orders and varying perspectives. If you were a Lieutenant ordered to kill a hundred prisoners in a town that had shown resistance, you don't necessarily know that that there are a hundred others ordered to do the same that day across all of Poland, and that all the victims are of the same religion. A later historian might have that information in the form of eye-witness accounts, and maybe local news reports. Since the Nazis destroyed so many records, though, we might not have any signed orders saying "Round up the Jews and kill them all." So it's a matter, sometimes, of interpreting what happened.
Remember, it's a war, and over a hundred million died violently. Towns and countries were destroyed. Rumors--true and false--are more common than documented evidence, and even where there is documented evidence, it isn't always clear how representative that evidence is. If a colonel somewhere ordered several lieutenants to slaughter prisoners, was that order his own, or did it come from above? If a prison camp gassed thousands, was that the result of national policy or a mass-murdering psychopathic commandant? There is a lot of room for interpretation, and that means a lot of room for distortion. The governments on both sides did some of the distorting, too. Keep in mind that one of the Allies was Joseph Stalin.
The Holocaust happened. Millions, maybe tens of millions, were murdered as part of a Nazi plan to exterminate those who did not fit the Nazi idea of racial purity. A hundred million more were slaughtered by both sides in military actions that targeted civilians and troops. Hitler did target the Jews specifically, but he did also target other groups. All of that is certain. It's just some of the interpretations that are hard to determine, and the deniers take those vagaries and spin them into denial of what Hitler did. And what he did was so horrific that some people just doubt it could be true.
Way too long, I know. And not specific on evidence. Sorry. :)
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
