Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MMJ advocacy groups urge Obama to withdraw nomination of Michele Leonhart to DEA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 01:38 PM
Original message
MMJ advocacy groups urge Obama to withdraw nomination of Michele Leonhart to DEA
OK President Obama. Here's another chance to do the right thing. Rein in the DEA. The first step is to replace Leonhart with someone who pays attention to what your AG says!

http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0724/marijuana-advocacy-groups-urge-obama-withdraw-nomination-michele-leonhart/

A number of medical marijuana advocacy organizations are urging President Obama to withdraw his nomination of Michele Leonhart to serve as the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

Leonhart was nominated to be the Deputy Administrator by President Bush in 2003 and confirmed by the Senate in 2004. She has been the acting Administrator of the DEA since the former Administrator, Karen P. Tandy, resigned in November of 2007.

snip

According to a joint press release issued on Wednesday, these groups claim Leonhart "has not demonstrated that she is capable of leading the agency in a thoughtful manner at a time when 14 states have enacted medical marijuana laws and science is increasingly confirming the therapeutic benefits of the substance."

Of concern to these groups, under Leonhart's administration, the DEA has raided a number of legal medical marijuana growers and dispensaries. In one case, the DEA raided the very first person to register for a medical marijuana cultivation permit, a sixty-nine year old woman from Mendocino County in California, even though her personal marijuana garden had been inspected and approved by the local sheriff.


The DEA needs marijuana to be completely illegal to justify their huge budget and to continue "The War On Drugs". Without it their budget would be cut and staff gutted. Gotta protect our phoney baloney jobs here gentlemen! Harumph!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. another bushite... why am i not suprised? conservative manchurain strikes again
blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd be happy if they just cut funding for the DEA
and abolished it as a government agency. The "War On Drugs" has been ongoing since the early 70s and is a total failure. It's 2009 Budget was $2.6 BILLION dollars. http://www.justice.gov/dea/agency/staffing.htm

For all that money what have we received? A black market drug trade that has killed millions of people but has failed to stem the flow of drugs into this country and a very profitable private prison system in the US that is fed by low level drug dealers and even lower level drug users.

I'd be very happy if that $2.6 Billion a year (and rising) would go toward providing some decent health care, build a few schools and roads or just help balance the budget. All better uses of the money that what it's going for now.

Rant over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC