Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Procedural DU question...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:28 AM
Original message
Procedural DU question...
why is it we are referring to the objects of our distaste as '*' etc?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. He will be nothing but a footnote to history
:hi:

I've also heard it is short for )*(, as in a pair of butt cheeks being spread wide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. I use only use bu$h in lower case to denote my lack of respect
And the $ denotes the money hungary thief he is.

About the lack of respect, he hasn't done anything to earn respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I pretty much can't type an uppercase when refering to a repukeliCON
just something about my fingers won't allow me.

Oh, and its all about respect too, nothing else. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. It has to do with the recount
When a baseball player has some special stat, the stat on a baseball card is marked with an *. The implication is that Bush was president on a technicality and didn't really win. That is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yes, according to wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictionalized_portrayals_of_George_W._Bush
In the political comic Doonesbury, President George W. Bush was symbolized by a Stetson hat atop a giant asterisk. The hat referred to his time spent as Governor of Texas; Doonesbury artist Garry Trudeau refers to Bush of being "all hat and no cattle".<2> The asterisk was intended to represent the special circumstances surrounding Bush's election, it being the typical symbol to mark footnoted special circumstances in any standard record book.

Later, President Bush's symbol was changed to a Roman military helmet (again, atop an asterisk) representing imperialism. Towards the end of his first term, the helmet became battered, with the giltwork starting to come off and with clumps of bristles missing from the top, but on September 2, 2006, he fantasized about himself wearing a crown.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doonesbury
More recently, personal symbols reflecting some aspect of their character are used. For example, members of the Bush family have been depicted as invisible. During his term as Vice President George H.W. Bush was first depicted as completely invisible, his words emanating from a little “spark” in the air. This was originally a reference to the man’s perceived low profile and his denials of knowledge of the Iran-Contra Affair. (In one strip, published 20 March 1988, the vice president almost materialized, but only made it to an outline before reverting to invisibility.) President George W. Bush was later symbolized by a Stetson hat atop a giant asterisk (a la Roger Maris), because he was Governor of Texas prior to his presidency (Trudeau accused him of being “all hat and no cattle” ) and also due to the controversy surrounding the 2000 presidential elections. Later, President Bush’s symbol was changed to a Roman military helmet (again, atop an asterisk) representing imperialism. Towards the end of his first term, the helmet became battered, with the giltwork starting to come off and with clumps of bristles missing from the top. (By now, the helmet has been dented almost beyond recognition.) On 2 September, 2006, he fantasized about himself wearing a crown.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think Doonesbury started it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Yep.
I'm guessing it gets back to the asterisk in baseball stats -- suggesting that the stat is diminished because of the circumstances. (Roger Maris's single season homerun record was considered less than the Babe's because the season in Ruth's era was shorter).

Bush* is considered to NOT be president because of the circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. The * came from Doonesbury
His pResidency will always have an asterik next to it in the history books so it can be noted that he first gained access to the WH due to the Supreme Court and not the voters.

I call him blivet** (note the two asteriks because the second election wasn't clean either) because it fits him perfectly, both as a man and as a President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. "Blivet"? The thinks I learn on DU....
Blivet

The picture is interesting, and I think sums up the Junta quite well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I like the military definition of the word.
"ten pounds of manure in a five-pound bag"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. That's how I understand the word (and use it).
Until seeing that Wikipedia entry, I've not acknowledged any other meaning. Even as a long-time computer professional, I've never heard the definition cited. I strongly suspect that the other definitions are the result of contextual interpretations by people who didn't comprehend the meaning of the word as used and who failed to either ask or get an honest answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I always have considered the military definition in my use of the
word as well. Ten pounds of shit in a five pound bag, IMHO, describes him/them perfectly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. the 'blivet'
as that asterix is reffered to..

similar to the asterix used in record books to refer to Roger Maris' 61 home runs in one season. Sure, its an official record, but its not "really" a record. Just like Bush is officially the president, but not "really" a president. I think it first came about after the 2000 election because of the whole Supreme Court case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lobster Martini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Feel free to invent a new le nom de dédain n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Historically it denotes a pRes who won the electoral college totals
but not the popular vote totals. I believe it only happened one other time prior to *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ok, im with you with the '*'
Edited on Mon May-14-07 08:44 AM by jakem
for some reason I thought I had remembered some sort of referrence on DU of not wanting to give the internet presence to various repuglicking names. Seemed weird, as they don't actually get any good press in here...

Must have just been a figment... carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. To me, he will always be *²
His Daddy was *..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC