Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Libertarian government ever ruled on Earth???? What country was that again?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:53 AM
Original message
What Libertarian government ever ruled on Earth???? What country was that again?
How long were they in power for? And what have historians had to say about their society? Was it successful like they say it would be?

Golly, there are so many "libertarians" around you'd think they'd have a track record of their accomplishments. Looks great on paper though, don't it?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Could much the same be said of Communism?
Edited on Mon May-14-07 10:57 AM by Solo_in_MD
We keep getting told that *true* Communism has never been tried, that China, USSR, Cuba and others are not truly communist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. We're talking about Libertarianism not communism. Quit trying to change the subject.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. My point was that none of the fringe governmental systems have or could really be implemented
since they are impractical and make assumptions inconsistent with the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Understood.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. It was called the wild, wild west.
Libertarianism works when there is so much acreage and resources between neighbors, that everybody can be their own boss hog.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Only if you get that unpleasant "genocide" business finished quickly and quietly enough.
If you can do that, PerfectLibertarianism™ can create the illusion
of a functional society for a generation or two...until the peasants
revolt.

And, G*D love 'em, they always do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Aren't "libertarians" just conservatives who like to smoke pot?
And read Ayn Rand while high?

}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Reading Ayn Rand straight takes enough time as it is
I can't picture reading that blowhard stoned, and taking 5-6 times the amount of subjective time to read her crap! Yuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Ayn Rand is for people who secretely believe themselves to be part of the "elite".
Edited on Mon May-14-07 11:17 AM by Marr
I read that in an interview with a comicbook writer of all things. I thought he about had it.

Every Ayn Rand fan I've ever known fell into one of two categories:

1) Upper middle class person who believes they're wealthy. Usually because everyone they know is lower middle class.

2) person who thinks they're soon *going to be* wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. No, that's Libertarians.
different from libertarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Randites use crack cocaine...
Grover Norquist for example. :+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. The country of "Me, Myself and I". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. It does look good on paper
Just like Marx's work did, it just doesn't quite work that way in the real world.I don't think verbatim Ayn Rand would be any better of a way to run a country that verbatim Karl Marx would be.

I have a bit of a libertarian bent myself, especially when it comes to personal freedom, not as much on the economic side, to the frustration of some of my libertarian friends.

The one thing they can never adequeately explain is how to keep the whole thing from devolving into a feudal state due to the effects of uncontrollable greed by the powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. answer of course, is none. it's a nice idea to be totally free, but I for one
need some semblance of order to the thing, and guess what, that means my neighbor is not "free" to sell crack to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Libertarianism is based on obsolete, disproven notions of human nature.
Edited on Mon May-14-07 06:24 PM by Odin2005
Libertarianism is a mix of outdated notions of man as an entirely rational being and Kantian ethics. The first notion was overturned by Freud and Jung (the folks who pushed consumerism on American society back in the 1920s got thier notions straight from Freud). Kantian ethics is nonsense because it is full of logical contradictions that result into going back to the ends-based thinking (such as Utilitarianism) that Kant attacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC