Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A friend was considered for ass't. U.S. Attorney job year ago.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:15 AM
Original message
A friend was considered for ass't. U.S. Attorney job year ago.
Actually in late 2005.
He had 7-8 years of practice under his belt with heavy litigation experience.
Graduated with honors from a top ivy league university and a top 5 law school.
Nice looking guy, very personable, and smart as a whip.
No skeletons in closet.

At first the office where he had applied was very encouraging. He met with the U.S. Attorney in charge and the meeting went very well. Looked like the job would be his.

Then, out of the blue, all communication ceased.
After a few weeks he called one of the assistant attorneys that he knew in the office.
"Sorry, John. We've had a big shake-up in personnel here and evidently some radical changes in hiring practices and qualifications. That's all I can tell you."

It was very puzzling to both of us.
And the answer to 'why?' just now hit me.
John is not a Republican.
I'm having one of those 'duh' moments.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. a good friend,
well, actually a woman who I lusted over for years (to her hubby's chagrin) has been an asst. US atty for most of her career. A lot of notable successes, talented courtroom presence, and extremely hard work in preparation.
The religious idiots have put her careeer in the mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. We said nuthin'
:)

You're right, of course. I'm not into conspiracies, but it's pretty obvious to all that that's just how things are done under this Administration.

The next Democrat Administration needs to change this once and for all. It's no use leaving the door open to a repeat performance.

No other developed country would put up with this. Elsewhere, the obligation is to pick the best applicant regardless of party affiliation. If their politics get in the way of proper government work, they're out. But otherwise their politics is their business, and it's not a party nomination process.

The US needs government officers doing the footwork for the people who aren't just party appointees, who'll put duty first and who'll blow the whistle on wrongdoing by either side.

It just needs the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It used to be that way HERE
and it will be again. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's never been this bad
... but I think this calls for entrenching such requirements.

Never again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Always a tough job to get
Law school graduates would kill to be Asst US Attorneys or judicial clerks and the jobs are few and far between.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC