Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now that the good judge has overturned the stupid Prop 8, I have

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:10 PM
Original message
Now that the good judge has overturned the stupid Prop 8, I have
a question. When Prop 8 first came up, I read that married people have somewhere around 1750 benefits that the rest of us (no matter who we are) don't have. I certainly haven't read all of the benefits (got to do that), but my question is why should ANY group of people have 1750 benefits that the rest of us don't have? My pension for example. As a single person I can't leave it to anyone, and even if I was a single parent I couldn't leave it to my kids - it can only be left to a spouse. Anybody got any info that I missed that shows a single group of people should have more rights than the others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe that it is well established that the Government has the right
to advance policies that are 'in the public interest' that give preference to a group of people, as long as entry into that group of people is not done on a discrimantory manner.


For example it is well established that areas with high home ownership have lower crime rates. Therefore the government undertakes significant tax and other policies to make it easy for first time home owners to buy property. Home owners have the 'right' to deduct interest payments etc.

For the same reason the goverment has an interest in promoting stable family units.

The argument against 8 was that the government established these 'rights' or privledges and then excluded one group of people from ever gaining access to them = a violation of the 14th ammendment of equal protection.

The government has the right to enact policies that will help various groups, public transportation users, married couples, homeowners, for example, but they do not have the right to restrict entry into these groups based on race, sex, sexual orientation etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. A very good answer and I know you are correct, but isn't it
discrimantory to give benefits to married people and not give anything even close to single people? Now that I typed that I have to check and see if single people have any benefits that married people don't have, besides the fact that they are single.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC