CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 08:35 AM
Original message |
Bwahahahahaha - Poor Katie Couric |
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I was so hoping for a woman to take over an evening news broadcast... |
|
...but Katie Couric was so absolutely wrong for the position. There were so many great women choices out there for the position but CBS went for "Cute & Perky" I guess in hopes to sugar-coat the news for Americans.
This poor choice by CBS means it'll be another 1-2 decades until someone tries again to put a woman in charge of the evening news.
|
npincus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yes- Christianne Amanpour would have NBC and ABC and 2/3 spots. |
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. I think Christianne Amanpour would be fabulous |
|
She is a woman in the news that I truly admire!
|
MountainLaurel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
19. But Amanpour reports the news |
|
And not just the spin, so she would never get an anchor position with a major network.
|
Libby2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
21. She would be my first choice. n/t |
npincus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Do not use focus groups to determine what kind of news they'd "like to see" (translation: something soft and aquishy).
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
16. Lesson #2 - don't give media people who already have a national soapbox |
|
(read: RIGHTIE) yet another soapbox ("free speech segment") to pontificate about how they don't have a national soapbox to get their message out ...
|
otohara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. #3 - don't fire retired Generals |
One Sweet World
(323 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message |
tanyev
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. She would be an improvement over that Elizabeth Hasselblasselfrackelhoff twit. |
|
But that's not saying very much. :)
|
sheerjoy
(369 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
beats Rosie. Geez, what a mistake!
|
Joanie Baloney
(801 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue May-15-07 08:47 AM by Joanie Baloney
I agree with him :)
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
AngryAmish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. Shouldn't it be "couric is annoying"? |
|
I always thought "couric's" is possessive.
Any grammar pundits out there?
|
Zywiec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. I think it's a contraction |
|
Where Couric's is for Couric is. The same as it's is for it is.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. Wow. I sure do know how he feels. |
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
22. I couldn't agree more. nt |
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
23. I think they both are, but Gibson stops short of being grating. nt |
sheerjoy
(369 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
a gross choice...a bad bad bad mistake from the start. Old and cute does not translate to newsperson. She shoulda stayed where she was- where she could flash a little thigh now and then and people would think how cute... she is not a news person.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message |
12. They should just cut their losses. Can her, and make Olbermann an offer. |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
14. she should of stayed on "Today". |
|
Edited on Tue May-15-07 09:33 AM by alyce douglas
maybe she should be on "The View" see would fit right in!!
|
Quixote1818
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
18. I knew she was a poor choice right from the beginning |
|
How is it all these so called "brilliant" people could make such a blunder in picking her? This isn't Katie's fault it's the people who thought she would bring in ratings. She has a morning show personality NOT a news anchor personality. Cute and bubbly and serious news, clash!
There are many other women who would have been perfect in that position.
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message |