MrScorpio
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-05-10 05:10 AM
Original message |
Hey, Joey Scar! The anti-gay marriage people ARE bigots. |
|
You're showing your true colors.
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-05-10 05:12 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Joe can barely talk. He is stuttering and blathering. It is funny. |
MrScorpio
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-05-10 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
But it's shameful that no one is calling him on his bigotry
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-05-10 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. True, but they almost don't need to. Joe is calling himself out. Joe is being repetitive |
|
In his he doth protest to much that he is a libertarian and he believes in live and let live.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-05-10 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
He hasn't received the official talking points as yet. :D
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-05-10 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Barnicle was pretty weird, too. Did you hear him blather about people |
|
in Missoula, MT not caring much about marriage equality for gays. How the hell does HE know?
Missoula just happens to be the home of the University of MT and I have a good friend whose sister (a confirmed liberal, like her) teaches there. Missoula is also the birthplace of Jeannette Rankin, the first woman elected to the U.S. Congress. Doesn't sound like a backwater to me...
Barnicle and Joe can go suck eggs...
|
evirus
(782 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-05-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Already turned him off |
|
the fact that he just uncritically accepted the claim that democrats purposeful killed the 9-11 responders bill eroded what little patience i had for listening to his stupidity.
awhile ago it was him "call out" the peace loving liberals for not being vocal about the wars now that Obama's in office.
|
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-05-10 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Why would Democrats change the rules and use a procedure that requires two thirds to pass? |
|
They know they will NEVER get Republicans to side with them on any issue in such numbers.. I do believe it was deliberate and it was done for political reasons and had no real concern for those Americans the bill would address. The Bill passed by a large amount just no where near two thirds..This was POLITICAL and anyone saying different should give an explanation why the rules were changed for this.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message |