Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is the end of the internet as we know it (re: Google & Verizon's 'tier' plans)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 11:57 AM
Original message
This is the end of the internet as we know it (re: Google & Verizon's 'tier' plans)
UNLESS you:

1. Call White House: 202-456-1111.
2. Call Congress: 202-224-3121.
3. Write FCC: http://j.mp/3yQkOU
4. Cancel Verizon internet: 888-553-1555

and FIGHT this crap!

You KNOW how they control and censor the "news" media. They WILL do the same to the internet. If the truth doesn't enhance their corprat bottom line, you won't be able to access it using their services on the internet! If that's OK with you - that the internet is controlled just like the TV and "news" networks are, then sit there and do nothing, otherwise, GET BUSY!


DAN RATHER lays it all out for you here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ckeqIoZz9c
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "tier" plans
Only refer to mobiles - correct ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No - they apply to general 'web' access, as I understand it...
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 12:10 PM by Triana
(Edit to add snip of article)

WASHINGTON — Google and Verizon, two leading players in Internet service and content, are nearing an agreement that could allow Verizon to speed some online content to Internet users more quickly if the content’s creators are willing to pay for the privilege.

The charges could be paid by companies, like YouTube, owned by Google, for example, to Verizon, one of the nation’s leading Internet service providers, to ensure that its content received priority as it made its way to consumers. The agreement could eventually lead to higher charges for Internet users.

Such an agreement could overthrow a once-sacred tenet of Internet policy known as net neutrality, in which no form of content is favored over another. In its place, consumers could soon see a new, tiered system, which, like cable television, imposes higher costs for premium levels of service.

Any agreement between Verizon and Google could also upend the efforts of the Federal Communications Commission to assert its authority over broadband service, which was severely restricted by a federal appeals
court decision in April.

MORE...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38571113/ns/technology_and_science-the_new_york_times/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. This implies otherwise
Google, Verizon deny mobile pay tiers plan.

Google and Verizon Wireless on Thursday denied that they are looking to create pay tiers for websites on mobile phones.

"(NY Times) is wrong," Google said on its public policy Twitter feed. "We've not had any convos with VZN (Verizon) about paying for carriage of our traffic. We remain committed to an open Internet."

A New York Times report "is mistaken," David Fish, Verizon's executive director of media relations, wrote on the telecom giant's public policy blog, echoing Google. "It fundamentally misunderstands our purpose. As we said in our earlier FCC filing, our goal is an Internet policy framework that ensures openness and accountability and incorporates specific FCC authority, while maintaining investment and innovation." He added: "To suggest this is a business arrangement between our companies is entirely incorrect."

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3iab2d241f10a74f759cd6ee3251134bd6

If its just mobiles then I really couldn't give a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The M$NBC article gives the distinct impression that it's not just mobiles but...
...if it IS- then guess what's next?

They've (the ISPs - corprats) have been after net neutrality for a while now, as we know. Their greed knows no bounds. Let them get their hooks into control of internet access to truth and facts the same way they control other media and we're royally screwed - even moreso than now.

First, they came for the mobiles.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Issues have already arisen over here of late
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 12:57 PM by dipsydoodle
but not on the subject of content - on the issue of usage. Unlimited broadband contracts for mobiles are about to become a thing of the past with most new agreements subject to limits and pay thereafter.

Off topic - just noticed the number plate. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Triana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Except Google maintains that they are not doing this
I can't speak for Verizon, but I've read several places where those who run Google maintain that they are not doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'd like to think they're not. I hope that's true. On the other hand...
....when they vehemently deny, you have to wonder. Remember 'we don't torture', or 'no we're not laying off, your job is fine, no worries' - ..... or "75% of the oil in the Gulf has evaporated..."

Pfft. I like Google. I want to trust them. But I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC