Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How A Good Samaritan Was Arrested For Driving Drunks Home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:35 PM
Original message
How A Good Samaritan Was Arrested For Driving Drunks Home
How A Good Samaritan Was Arrested For Driving Drunks Home

How A Good Samaritan Was Arrested For Driving Drunks HomeJonathon Schoenakase of Quincy, Illinois was arrested last Saturday outside a local bar. His crime? Operating "Courtesy Rides" — a service offering free rides to bar-goers to prevent drunk driving. The reason? Taxi companies lobbied to make it illegal.

Schoenakase began operating Courtesy Rides on January 31, 2008 following a decision to do something about drunk driving after one of his friends was killed by a drunk driver. The service offers free rides to anyone who's been out drinking and needs a ride home, donations are accepted, but it's free to all. It was such a success Jonathan added a second car to the effort in 2009, then a bus, and that's when Diamond Cab service took notice.

They complained to the city that Schoenakase was operating a de facto taxi service without a proper license, but in reality they were mad he was cutting into their profits by offering for free what the Diamond was charging for. Amusingly, he was probably hitting a different demographic, cheapskates who don't want to pay for taxis but want to get home so they drink and drive, but that's beside the point. The cab company complained loud enough that the Quincy City Council changed its taxi and limousine ordinance to remove the words "for hire" from its definitions and thus eliminate the loophole Schoenakase was operating under. Following the change, Jonathan applied for a license and the Chief of Police was supposedly about to approve it, but withdrew and said Schoenakase needed to clear up some legal issues.

Since then Schoenakase has continued operating Courtesy Rides and has been arrested twice now during sting operations, once in February and then again just last Saturday.

http://jalopnik.com/5604559/how-one-good-samaritan-was-arrested-for-driving-drunks-home?skyline=true&s=i
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. If he were charging people for a ride home I could see where
the taxis might have a case, but he didn't charge anyone, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, Schoenakase should just run his little outfit for nothing?
What happens should he or one of his drivers get into a collision? Does he have sufficient insurance for himself, his passenger and whoever gets hit? If the cabs in Quincy are anything like cabs in other parts of the country, they have to maintain rigorous upkeep, regular maintenance, and the drivers are all drug tested routinely. Yes, Schoenakase is cutting into the cab companies' profit; he's also not following the same rules. "Courtesy" or not, he's taking food off of working folks' tables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So it is ok with you to let people drive drunk?
What if he gets a taxi license, then what? He is still cutting into their profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Who said that?
But the taxis have to be licensed, insured, are regulated to a fare-thee-well, and are operated by folks who work long hours. Schoenakase gets to take money out of their pockets because he has a compelling personal story? If he wants to cut down on drunk driving, he can set up a fund to pay for cab rides home. Why take money from honest, hard-working people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. perhaps you need to read the story again..
he doesn't operate a fucking cab. do i need to "maintain rigorous upkeep" of my vehicle in order to drive a drunk friend home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Do taxi drivers have a God-given right to drive people home?
Of course they don't. And besides, he targets ONLY inebriated people. That's a big market and he only operates a few vehicles.

He's doing a public service that will arguably save lives.

And you're squabbling about lost profits for a taxi company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Taxi companies are guilty of Manslaughter for every person they fail to give a ride home...
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 07:06 PM by slampoet
...who ends up killing someone.


If they are the MONOPOLY then they have the RESPONSIBILITIES of one.

Also when does the state start setting their rates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good on you Jonathon Schoenakase
you may have saved some lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC