Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which Democrat voted against Kagan?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:53 PM
Original message
Which Democrat voted against Kagan?
How have I missed that? I have heard twice in the news that "all but one democrat voted for her", but looking here I don't see any reference.

Inquiring minds want to know! :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nelson if I was to guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you would be right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ben Nelson of Neb.
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 05:56 PM by Chan790
and he's a DINO. That label gets tossed a lot to the point it has lost a lot of meaning, but in Ben's case he's an actual dinosaur of our party that should be taken to the woodshed like Zell Miller before him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for the info...
and that MF needs to just go ahead and change his brand. Sheez, and everybody's upset with Scott Brown. At least Brown calls himself what he really is... Nelson, not so much! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He is a Demoçrat
The ç is silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. You couldn't guess that shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7.  Yes, all must vote in lock step, no other thought is allowed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I think that is goosestep
Kind of fun to watch the "independent thinkers", getting themselves all twisted into a pretzels with this one.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Other thoughts are allowed, it's just those thoughts should be kicked out of the party. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
16.  WOW!! A true Progressive speaks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. +1. I wonder if Nelson has even READ the party platform.
He sure as hell doesn't vote like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. You didn't get my post did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howaboutme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Diversity, diversity, diversity - so where is it?
I see the Supreme Court as the last bastion of true ethnic and cultural diversity.

Sorry but I see the Elena Kagan appointment (another Jewish NYCer from Harvard) as not being in the interests of and about the needed diversity of our country, and our Supreme Court. We needed SC justices from diversified cultures and diversified geographic areas and instead we got more of the same.

Diversity, culture, religious background is the cornerstone of decisions involving justice. You can't have all White Protestant males making the decisions on justice and you can't have the Jewish making up 33% of the Supreme Court decision makers when they only make up 2% of the country.

Our Democracy is about diversity of all and not about diversity of a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I for one am not particularly worried about Jewish influence in our government.
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 07:03 PM by superduperfarleft
After all, bagels are pretty good. And that Woody Allen guy makes decent movies. Teh Joos seem like they really have their shit together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yeah, because the Miranda ruling was all about protecting East Coast Ivy League elites.
Do you have ANY idea how RW propagnda-ish your argument sounds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howaboutme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. But I don't understand.
I didn't know that those of us who desire and believe in full ethnic and cultural diversity can be considered right wingers. Is this a new plank of the Democratic Party?

Can you please explain how less diversity is better than more diversity? Or does less diversity not count sometimes?

If any institution should be about full diversity (gender, religious, cultural, ideological) it should be the US Supreme Court because they are appointed for life and they remain there regardless of their views and views of the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Wow, really? Did my point really escape you that badly?
Bless your heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yeah, I want a Gay Asian Nebraskan Protestant on the SCOTUS.
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 07:14 PM by Chan790
What's that you say? There are no Gay Asians from Omaha who attended bible college even nominally qualified to serve in such an important role? How about a multi-ethnic atheist hermaphrodite from Michigan who went to Vassar? None of those either? Shit, we'll have to settle for the spunky outwardly-asexual (though rumored to be a lesbian) New York City Jewish woman who headed Harvard Law School.

Quotas are fucking stupid. The last socially-acceptable vestige of -isms.

I want the nine smartest motherfuckers in the land on the SCOTUS bench...we're screwed on four of those seats and the fifth guy's a somewhat-flaky wildcard who usually votes against us...I'll settle for the four smartest motherfuckers for now and maybe we can get one or two more soon.

Kagan wasn't my first choice either (I wanted an intellectual-heavyweight non-judge like Larry Lessig or Nadine Strossen*)...my first choices both supported her nomination though. Good enough for me and my brainiac quota; that's the only quota I care about. Getting the smartest, best justices we can.


*-some day Ruth Bader Ginsburg is going to retire and if they don't nominate Strossen to replace her, I may go ballistic. I don't care if she's a board member for NORML.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howaboutme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Why not a gay Asian Nebraskan Protestant?
It would have been far better than what we got, which is over-representation of one minority and no representation from others. If you think that the ability to rule on justice is purely about beliefs you are wrong. Perceived justice comes from commonality in background, culture, religion, politics, geography, wealth and everything that forms all of our opinions. Americans will not accept rulings that are based upon the opinions of the few. Kagan has a NE Harvard Jewish culture and that represents but a tiny segment of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. You really do believe what you are typing.
More's the pity. I work in law, including having worked for some SCOTUS admitted attorneys who aren't white Protestant males from Ivy League schools--this nation would be in a far, far, sorrier state than we are if your fondest SCOTUS wish came true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howaboutme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. With all due respect
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 07:41 PM by howaboutme
the people of the USA and the democracy need representation from more than the just "elites" from the NE and Harvard..wouldn't you agree? Or are those from middle America the less than qualified serfs?

Most Americans can't afford to attend these Ivy League schools but that doesn't mean they should be excluded from our ruling aristocracy. These pretentious Ivy League schools are a club unto themselves and they perpetuate the belief that they alone can rule America. Kagan's appointment just perpetuated that absurd belief as does the overclass status of Goldman Sachs in our government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. "Jewish" culture. Wow. Now I get what you are saying--and it doesn't belong
on a message borard like DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howaboutme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Why not?
So what am I saying?

So is Jewish culture unique? Or is it the same as Muslim or Protestant or Asian or Catholic, or African American culture?

I suggest you go to Synagogue next Saturday and ask any Jew in attendance if their culture is unique unto Jews and then come back and report the results of your interview. That's why our country and our Supreme Court needed diversity and why a lack of it is very harmful to a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Shit, I guess I'm never going to get to be a justice.
Chan: NYU Law applicant who grew up in the shade of the ivy in New Haven, CT (and took some summer/continuing-ed courses at Yale to get my GPA up.) born to upper-class white parents. My father's family is Scots-Catholic, my mother's father was a Polish Jew (Nobody knew his parents had been Jewish until he died and we found out he'd known for years.) and my mom's mom was Lebanese-Catholic, her mom was a Mayflower descendant and a Mohegan Indian. The Bushes are very distant cousins on that branch of the tree. I'm a bisexual (female-preferring) atheist who is hard-of-hearing. I'm a leftist, left-handed and have AB- blood. I have a boy-crush on the long-dead John Maynard Keynes. I don't own a TV and I read 50-100 books a year, or 250 pages a day on average.

Or, if I ever get to that point, I could just be assessed on my qualifications to serve and legal expertise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Beuatifully put...
But I kind of think your point will be missed completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Were are all the high school drop out supreme court justices?
I'm sick and tired of all these judges on the highest court in the land coming from all the best law schools in the country.

What is this, some kind of elitism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. "Spics have Constitutions, too." See? My cousing Bufus gets the Niranda ruling down pat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. How far are you willing to carry this quota idea out? You mention white, Christian males
in your post--so you are offered Judge Kagan, who is Jewish and female--yet still you object because as you say below, she "represents" only 7% of Americans.

Wow. Do you really think before you type?.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nelson...I heard him say no...And you couldn't hear a lot of them
saying yes or no, but he made sure you heard him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. That would have to be Ben The Republican Who Calls Himself A Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Nelson the RWCHAD? I think "DINO" is a little less clumsy...
But there's a special magic to the sound of RW-CHAD. :rofl:

Though it does remind me of the 2000 voting fiasco. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC