Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diploma mills whining that coming regulation will eat into their profits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 08:01 AM
Original message
Diploma mills whining that coming regulation will eat into their profits
Edited on Sat Aug-07-10 08:12 AM by marmar
:nopity:


By Christopher Hinton, MarketWatch


NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Shares for companies that provide university and college degrees declined Friday after The Washington Post Co. said proposed U.S. regulation of for-profit educators could harm its Kaplan division.

The new regulations, if passed, would help to halt predatory lending to low-income students and tighten standards among financial aid advisors.

Such changes could "adversely affect" the Kaplan's ability to retain admission workers, financial aid advisors and students, the Washington Post said in a statement.

Kaplan is the company's largest division in terms of operating income. ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/for-profit-educators-slump-on-regulation-fears-2010-08-06



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. I love how they frame their objection
It will "adversely affect" their ability to retain admission workers, financial aid advisors and lastly, students.

All this does is make the proposed regulation look like just another way of putting people out of work. Right away, there will be defenders echoing this. "It provides jobs! If you take away their ability to make a profit, you're gonna put people out of work! And think of all the professors who are going to be laid off, too!"

It's not that these statements aren't true -- it's that they represent only the "small benefit" portion of the equation, the other half of which is "BIG COST."

This was illustrated to me just the other day by an acquaintance who runs a small retail business. I was in need of a sympathy card to send to a friend whose mother had passed away. "Oh, I have cards," the business owner told me. She knew I try to patronize small, local businesses over impersonal national chains whenever I can, so I went to look at her selection, which consisted of two revolving racks of cards placed in her store on consignment.

They were nice cards, but also quite expensive. I know her well enough to ask her, "How much do you make off each one you sell?" Her gross profit was 25%, but she was also responsible for inventory damaged or soiled. I could actually pay her the 25% profit on a sale, then go to another store that also had cards and buy one cheaper than the 75% that went to the consignor.

The benefits of having people employed by these parasitical "colleges" are many times outweighed by the costs (which pretty much equal the profits that go to the stockholders).



Tansy Gold, nty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. But...but..our bonuses!....the Golden Parachute!..will be in jeopardy
And I was so looking forward to getting my PhD. at Beck University.

Damn...foiled again.x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good!
How shameful of them to use the employees as their shield. How many people have they thrown into the job market with dodgy degrees and loads of debt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1957john1957 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. There are not-for-profit colleges/universities which aren't much better. All employees' salaries
depend on how many students are paying tuition, so there's an equal pressure to recruit students. Even grades (whether or not a student at least passes) are influenced by this pressure - faculty who fail too many students find themselves under great negative pressure, especially if they are non-tenured (even if the students truly deserve to fail and even if faculty have made great effort to help those students).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree, the rules and reporting should be tightened for ALL colleges and universities
Not all the bad eggs are for profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somebody call the Waaaaaahmbulance!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kaplan: owned by the Washington Post. Which runs PR touting "education reform" --
Edited on Sat Aug-07-10 01:10 PM by Hannah Bell
like:

- loosening the rules to help increase profits at diploma mills (kaplan = diploma mills)
- mandating more testing in k-12 (kaplan = test materials & prep)
- allowing chain charter schools (kaplan = canned curriculum)


it's good to have friends in high places. The WAPO talks up "reform" & its for-profit ed company reaps the bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC