Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How did communism come about?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:16 AM
Original message
How did communism come about?
I'm pretty sure that teabaggers and freepers think it came from that guy with scary looking biker beard must have smoked a joint, came up with a villainous economic system, and said "And I shall call it Marxism. Muhahaha!"

No, during the time Marx was around, he saw communism as a viable alternative to the practices of the day. People working long hours for virtually nothing, dangerous working conditions, and no matter how hard you worked, the guy in the plush leather chair who didn't even have to lift a finger gets all the money from your labor. "Oh, and here's a penny for you. Now get out of here, you peasant."

Cut to 2010; we've got thousands of people in line for 10 job openings and we've got potential workers willing to work more hours and for less pay, but employers still say "I don't want to hire because it'll mean I'll have to cut from my measly multimillion dollar bonuses and I might have to give myself a paycut down from being paid only 300 times more than my workers."

Now, I'm not advocating a revolution or even communism in any form, but why shouldn't capitalist leaders be compelled to defend capitalism instead of just giving us the thought terminating cliche of "It may not be perfect, but it's the best system we've got", just how is that so?

Employers can wait before they start hiring, but the last time I checked; paying rent, groceries, utilities, medical bills, etc. don't take a rain check because you can't pay. And it's time for Wall Street and the government to acknowledge that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. One place to start is the works of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Communism & Fascism both
acknowledge him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. The mixed market seems to work well. We should get back to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That really is the solution
Let the tax cuts on the wealthy expire
Bring back regulations
Protect consumers
And an employer of last resort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Communism" didn't come about.
It has never actually been tried.
Oh sure, the Soviets forced a bunch of people into farming communes, but that's not the same as "Communism."
There is nothing at all "Communist" about China today.

We might actually be at the point where Capitalism is about to implode and crush itself under its own weight.
At that point, the conditions for Communism might be there.
People will band together, or die.
However, we've been so brutally propagandized in this country, that anything that sounds even remotely like "Communism" will be soundly rejected.

Signed,
The_Commonist
Who believes we need to pursue "Commonizm," which begins with the notion that we are all in this together...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Actually, we have Soviet style communism right here.
The Soviets perfected the top down rule of government and we all called it communism.

We have that here, today. The elites have created a top down ruling system that allows them to make decisions for us from behind their closed doors.

True communism would mean that communal decisions were being made. Decisions made in the open with all the community involved.

The Soviets, as the PTB are wont to do, corrupted it and our government has adopted it as their own. Only here we call it republicanism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I think you're quite correct, we just call it something else. We are suppressed, controlled.
manipulated and propagandized a lot now in this country. Americans have been bred to accept what we have as the best in the world.

We call it capitalism, but is has morphed into a subdued and apathetic population subjugated, manipulated, controlled and propagandized by a ruling class of wealthy oligarchs. In short, many Americans are brainwashed and react in their own worst interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Keep dreaming...
"At that point, the conditions for Communism might be there."

Where upon it will fail yet again.

"It has never actually been tried."

It's been tried countless times in countless places and the result is abysmal failure always. It's still being tried and continues to predictably fail. Cuba = Fail. Laos = Fail. North Korea = Epic Fail.

This ideology will never, ever work. It tries to utterly defy human nature instead of harness it, requires more and more coercion over time to keep the system in place, and is simply unworkable and every bite at the utopian apple results in mass death, starvation and general failure.

Mixed economies work best. They are not perfect at all, but they are our best option at this time. Communism is not an option at all, and no, the conditions are not ripe for another stab at it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. nonsense. rightwingers talk too much
that's a fact even the rightwing stooge rosh limbah (aka bob loblaw) won't deny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Keep dreaming?
Well, it's not MY dream.

I have a good friend who just graduated from medical school in Cuba.
According to her, for the most part, the people of Cuba like their lives there.
The system works for people.
Of course, that doesn't mean there are no problems.
However, the biggest problem that Cuba has has been the way they have been treated by the United States.
If Cuba was allowed to trade and interact with the U.S. it might actually be a worker's paradise.
And that scares the shit out the capitalists more than anything else, hence our negative treatment of that country.

North Korea is not and has never been a communist country. You fail.
I don't know enough about Laos to comment.

And I like the way that you repeat that old canard about it "being against human nature." Yawn!
Human nature is a lot of things. It is not only greed and blind self-interest.
It is also compassion and enlightened self-interest.
Despite what Ayn Rand has told you.
Capitalism has grown to mainly "harness" the worst in us.

And yes, mixed markets seem to work the best.
Again, CommUnism is not my dream, it was a 19th century dream that a certain class of dictators seized upon to control the masses in countries that were not ready for it in the first place.
This country, right now, is at the state that Marx was talking about.

And again, we need some new vision, that takes into account that "The Commons" belong to all of us, we all depend upon them, and we need to come up with a system that is good for people, not just good for corporations...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. It tries to utterly defy human nature instead of harness it
seems to me its the nature of Euro races if its valid at all that fits in with that old argument. When push comes to shove most people realize that joining together works much better...from each according to ability, to each according to need, sounds like the best of humanity to me...

"Human nature" is a social construct, I think, created by the rulers to oppress...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. +10,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Communism has been tried a number of times.
We should be honest with ourselves that those countries and others made attempts at communism, even though they failed to achieved anything closely resembling it. The lesson is that giving enough power to any central ruling authority to create a communist society is just as likely to be used for the creation of something vastly different.

We have also seen many times that the conditions which are supposed to bring about communist revolution are just as likely to bring about something much worse. Conservative corporate leaders have shown themselves to be far better at using a crisis to achieve their goals than Marxists have. Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein was a conclusive study of that reality.

Waiting for a Marxist revolution to usher in a dictatorship of the proletariat has proven to be a failed strategy at reaching the end goals of communism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Communism is simply puffed up tribalism
you have a group of people who pool their resources and/or skills to survive.

That concept is tens-of-thousands of years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whyverne Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Right! We all came from tribes and they were communistic.
Everything went in the common pool. That's why I laugh when somebody says communism doesn't work. We wouldn't be here if it didn't work. Maybe capitalism is better, but that's not my argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. you have a group of people who pool their resources
sounds good to me...Isn't it interesting that our government system is based on a communistic type of society, the Iroquois?? (they forgot the part that the Hags had the last say when they co-opted it, but that's another discussion). If we truly had adopted their system where there was no private property, we'd be in great shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. industrial communalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Capitalism was indefensible then and it still is.

There was a time in our recent past when Capital was compelled to provide a veneer of decency in order to compete with the socialist example. No longer, can there be any doubt that Capitalism really upped the ante the moment that socialism collapsed? What we are experiencing is not any perversion of Capitalism but Capitalism pure and simple.Capitalism necessitates communism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Democratic Socialism is to way to go
imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. I agree. You don't want the government to
do everything. However, there are institutions that involve human rights that should be government run and taxpayer funded, like we used to have. I really don't like this race to privatization. Every where it has been tried in the world it has failed. I'm especially dismayed that prisons are being run by private companies and they have their eyes on our public school system next. Oh, btw they don't mind taking taxpayer's money for it. I say any industry that needs tax payer money to function needs to be nationalized and run by the government. We don't need the middle man there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. 34 BCE...
...when the congregation of those who believed were of one heart and soul; and not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them.

Acts 4:32
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. I recommend reading Engels and Lenin -
little easier to get through. "Imperialism" by Lenin is particularly helpful in understanding the current situation here at home. Also read the Manifesto itself. Many openly mock it without ever having read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. You fail to mention the other option of democratic socialism
which has many examples of success.

Conservatives want to frame the debate as "Communism v. Capitalism." They know it's an argument they'll win every time because of how communism is viewed by the American public. There's a reason that third option is never the focus of discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. Actually, it goes back to the Stone Age.
Tribes or bands of humans hunted and gathered together and shared everything. That way the youngest and the eldest got their fair share of the bounty. There are pockets of tribal people, even today, like in the Amazon and Papua New Guinea who still practice this type of communal economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. According to Acts 4:32, the early Christian church practiced "communism"!


Acts 4:32. And the multitude of believers had but one heart and one soul. Neither did any one say that aught of the things which he possessed was his own: but all things were common unto them.

http://www.newadvent.org/bible/act004.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Actually, a lot of Christian institutions are still
communistic. All your monasteries and convents are. There are religious communities like the Amish, Mennonites and some Quakers that are still communistic. Even the Mormon Church started out with a foot in that commune type of living where the idea of tithing came about to not only fund churches and temples but to help out the poor and desperate in their community. Unfortunately, the business types took over and they are not so charitable any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. A few Evangelical communities and Jewish kibbutzes are "communist" in structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. that's a keeper...
thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
27. Communal life is the natural form of human society.
Capitalism sold "human nature=greed" as a projection of its own rewarding of sociopathic behavior. It's the ultimate snake-oil sale. Each country that tried to re-form under socialist lines was immediately attacked and subverted in various brutal ways by the western forces allied behind anti-communism. It's easy to declare yourself the winner of the fight when you've struck first and kneecapped everyone who could possibly undermine your scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yes, because we are after all primates who live in
communal groups. It is our way in nature. We should accommodate that in our civilizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC