Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gibbs walks back comments as "inartful"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:29 AM
Original message
Gibbs walks back comments as "inartful"
I watch too much cable, I admit. Day after day it gets frustrating. Yesterday I watched as someone called legislation to prevent teacher layoffs a bailout -- but I know that's not a view held by many, nor were the views I was frustrated about.

So what I may have said inartfully, let me say this way -- since coming to office in January 2009, this White House and Congress have worked tirelessly to put our country back on the right path. Most importantly, to dig our way out of a huge recession and build an economy that makes America more competitive and our middle class more secure. Some are frustrated that the change we want hasn't come fast enough for many Americans. That we all understand.


http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/robert_gibbs_concedes_attack_o.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. I say we walk back Gibbs and this whole fucking administration. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. in favor of what?
gibbs, emmanuel - i get the frustration. they're trying to placate the ignorant middle by bashing the base. the base who haven't had a bone thrown their way since the carter administration in stalled solar panels.

but this is reality. there is no better option than reelecting obama in 2012. when he's done, you'll look back on these 8 years and admit that it was a net positive, or that there was no further regression to the right.

at the very least, it could have been worse. a republican could have been president. and i think we've been in that place, a defensive holding pattern, for decades. in the face of the right's relentless propaganda campaigns, just holding the line is actually impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. In favor of the truth.
In favor of the People. In favor of the Poor. In favor of the Sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. but that's not the way politics has ever worked on this planet
and when someone tried, that politician caught a bullet. Lincoln, Trotsky, Joe Hill, Ghandi, JFK, RFK, Rabin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #32
66. That's a matter of proper bulletproofing and not flying on small planes.
Edited on Wed Aug-11-10 07:49 AM by HughBeaumont
It's also why you never see any middle class candidates for presidents. They're almost always going to have to be rich from this point on.

Don't ever make me president. I'd be in a Popemobile 24/7, behind bulletproof glass and whatnot. Anybody calls me paranoid, I'll just say "proving a point. Not going out like JFK or Sadat. You govern like I do, you're going to piss some people off to the point where they want to put a bullet in your skull. I know that's scary, but history proves me correct. The rich want what they want when they want it; that's the way it's always been. That era is over, and they'd best get used to it FAST."

I'll put these Republicans, bitch lobbyists and corpocrats in their place so fucking fast you would think I was Pacino in And Justice for All. "I RUN THIS COUNTRY, NOT YOU, YOU FUCK!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. But that's the problem....
the 'ignorant' is not the middle, what the MSM calls the left is! As some one else posted, whens the last time Gibbs has blasted the right like he has the left. Yes Obama is probably the best option on the table, but take a look back at Lincoln's primary to see how they deal with challenges from the left. And how involved in the 'health care' debate was he, did he help guide the 'discussion', did we, as a nation, start to learn how to work toward a goal of any thing other then tear your opponent down.



There's no room on my back for many more straws, lets just wait and see what they do with Warren's appointment (it should be hers, no ones in the same class). If some insider gets it instead of her, then ALL bets are off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
46. "there was no further regression to the right"??? Is that the new standard of success??
My translation: "At least we went a little while without being poked in the eye with a sharp stick... sure we were kicked in the gonads a few times, but that eye really needed a little break..." ??

Now that's some brilliant tacticianing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #46
59. what was the Clinton administration?
i'd say it was exactly that - we didn't regress further (i know, some will argue we did). and professional leftists looks back on it with fondness.

i'm not trying to be a tactician. i'm trying to be a realist about expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. The Clinton administration was a complete sellout, which happened to profit from a bubble.
Aside from the good times of the dot-com bubble, the Clinton administration was a regression (NAFTA- which I still think of as the Tratado de Libre Comercio, TLC, because I was in Mexico when it passed... and the Indígenas I was working with considered it the worst travesty and spot of economic injustice that they'd seen in a long time; and Welfare-to-Work,,, come to mind).

The Clinton administration, and Gore's apparent tacking even further Right inspired me to vote for Nader.

As I said... if that's all the standard that "realists" are willing to "pragmatically" hope for... well, I'll simply refer to precedent...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah... his true meaning was lost in his inartful presentation
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. The last paragraph should be read and practiced
By all of us:

So we should all, me included, stop fighting each other and arguing about our differences on certain policies, and instead work together to make sure everyone knows what is at stake because we've come too far to turn back now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
21.  Too bad for Gibbs & Obama. I won't stop fighting FOR single payer...
and I won't stop fighting against the flaws in the health insurance bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. Really? Shut up and follow us should be practiced?
Sorry, if I have a difference on certain policies it's my job to speak out about it. Did the Democrats really think we were going to be like the Dittoheads and rubber stamp every shitty policy? Sorry, not happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. He didn't say "Shut Up"
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 11:57 AM by blogslut
He said "STOP FIGHTING EACH OTHER".

Can you do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Stop fighting and arguing about our differences...
Sounds like shut the hell up to me. And no I cannot stop arguing that the war in Afghanistan is wrong. Or that the failure of the 9/11 health care bill was not a huge disaster, or that the renewal of the Partiot Act wasn't a huge mistake. Sorry if that pisses you and Gibbs and Rahm off but this is still America and I still have a say.

I don't know what these jerks are worried about, we don't have anyone else to vote for, there is no reason to treat me like I am some kind of outcast loser. All they managed to do was insure that they get my vote but no money and no help. It's a brilliant plan really. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. I'm not pissed
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 12:44 PM by blogslut
Nor am I Robert Gibbs or Rahm Emanuel.

I am your fellow DUer and I am begging you, please. Stop the hostility. Stop the witch hunts. Stop the name calling.

We're on the same side. It's the messy, complicated side but it is the same side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. "Stop the hostility" = "the messy, complicated side"
Just a heads up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. what Gibbs means:
The left should shut the fuck up and let the DLC run things in the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
49. +1,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
60. And I'm sure they'd love to have the DLC run things
just as soon as they move out of the Amana refrigerator/freezer box they've been holding meetings in.

I hear their membership rolls include three hobos and one very sick cat now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. "the right path"
Well, I thought we were already on that path. It leads to hell. We need to go left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. more
"So we should all, me included, stop fighting each other and arguing about our differences on certain policies, and instead work together to make sure everyone knows what is at stake because we've come too far to turn back now.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/robert_gibbs_concedes_attack_o.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Except over and over they show what they really mean is
that we should shut up and get work, a la that DLC post on Sunday night: "stop complaining and get to work".

I don't see this ending very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. RG is a schmuck
Politically, his boss, the President is hitting the right notes and making a good case for supporting his continuing agenda. He strikes a more conciliatory tone than Gibbs has here when he comments on dissent from his left-leaning critics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gibbs. straw. camel's back.
so you can STILL fuck off.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Gibbs needs to resign
Like last fucking year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. His only mistake was walking back the comments.
True, maybe it wasn't a mistake in terms of optics. But in terms of truth, his comments were right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
51. And that is why Obama will lose the next election -
his most ardent supporters do not have a clue what they are doing.

People will forget what you say, they'll forget what you do, but they'll never forget how you made them feel.

This is very damaging to the party and those of you who really care about Obama should figure out how to patch this up if you care about a second term. Personally I think it's too late. First Emanuel and now this - really damaging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. You've been pissing down our throats since day one
because you didn't get EXACTLY what you wanted EXACTLY when you wanted it. Forgive us if we don't indulge your victimhood.

I'll admit Gibbs' remarks were ill-advised, but be honest--they didn't change your opinion one whit. You already hated Obama and everything he's touched before Gibbs even opened his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. Expressing disappointment over terribly policy and personnel decisions..
= pissing down your throat?

mmkay...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wife beaters get inartfull taking out their frustration. Mr Gibbs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. LOL. A "professional" CYA statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. Too late, Gibbs, you neolib asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. We're ready to work with you any time you get around to it, Mr. Gibbs
Maybe we can start with an easy one: doing away with DADT or a strong statement in favor of same sex marriage, rather than this mealy-mouthed "full equality except here, here, here and here" nonsense. We can go on from there, but a little leadership from the White House would make this struggle go a lot easier. And the people you might "lose" by taking a strong stance? You weren't going to win them over, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. blahblahblah -- they always do this
And by "they," I mean TPTB. I am sick of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. So he used, as an example, a comment from the professional right in order to support...
his slam against the professional left.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
17. Let's analyze Gibbs' statement
But in 17 months, we have seen Wall Street reform...which preserves "too big to fail"...

historic health care reform...that didn't reform health care, but instead enslaved us to Big Insurance...

fair pay for women...okay, nice one...

a recovery act that pulled us back from a depression and got our economy moving again...except that unemployment rates haven't been properly dealt with yet...

And at the end of this month, 90,000 troops will have left Iraq and our combat mission will come to an end...but we're keeping troops and mercenaries in Iraq, which means the occupation will continue.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I think the problem is with most of what you said, rather than what Gibbs said.
For example, when you say that the bill didn't reform healthcare, that is a mistake of yours (not a mistake of Gibbs for pointing out the obvious).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Then why are my premiums still going up after the bill was passed?
Why can't I choose my own doctor, let alone choose a more competitive plan?

And Big Insurance still gets to make its own rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. and why were women's health choices thrown under the bus along the way??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
57. 'Cause the right wingers had to be catered to...
hurry up back under the bus or our heads might be run over.

Rep. Degette, CO, stood up for us, and I sent her flowers for doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. The bill hasn't even taken effect yet.
I find it quite hillarious that people are blaming premium increases that have always happened on a bill that hasn't even taken effect yet. If they want to bash HCR, they should AT LEAST wait until 2014 (to make them sound more credible).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Funny - all we're ever told is to "wait"
And when the reform bill fails to deliver on improving our overall quality of life, we'll be told again to "wait" - perhaps 25-50 years - for the first significant fixes to this legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Even the White House called it health insurance reform instead of health care reform.
They made the linguistic switch around August 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
52. It didn't reform health care, it tinkered with health INSURANCE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
27. He should resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. resign? Why? He perfectly reflects the attitude of the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #29
67. That's his problem. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. Wait. So Republicans go on cable and call teacher layoffs
a bailout.
Gibbs then turns his anger at that against liberals and lashes out at what he calls "the professional left." :crazy:
Then he issues this non-apology apology?

That's just doubly insulting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
34. inartful but accurate just by reading this board
and the melt down "Liberals" are having over being called out by Gibbs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moksha Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. Bullshit! That has none of the sentiment of the first statement.
The truth is he wanted to take a hit the real left. He took it. This updated statement would have been fine, but it doesn't say the same thing at all. It is a different statement and meaning altogether.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
39. Inartful? Try fucking stupid, dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frisbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
42. It's really quit simple, Mr. Gibbs...
The President made promises during his campaign, and now he is NOT honoring those promises. We supported him then, based on those promises, and entrusted him to right the wrongs of the past 8 years and put this nation back on the right track. Since he is not honoring those promises, we the people who put him in office have every right to be mad as hell. And for you to throw us a few bones every now and then, while puckering up and kissing the ass of those who are doing every thing in their power to continue to drive this country off a cliff in the name of bipartisanship, is simply not acceptable. Either dance with those who brought you to the dance, or don't act shocked that they are less than faithful or have lost interest in you in 2012. This President, the first black President, could have gone down in history as one of the greats had he fought to fix the mess he inherited. Instead, it sure looks to me like he will go done as yet another ineffective President who may have meant well, but lacked the courage to fight for what he believed in, and by doing so, accomplished little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
43. I can smell the sincerity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatchling Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Sincerity smells like bullshit?
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 01:42 PM by Hatchling
I didn't know that. Learn something new every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GSLevel9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
44. Gibbs is an idiot and should be fired ASAP. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
47. Fuck Fuck Fuck
He just doesn't fucking get it! He doesn't even understand what we are mad about and now hes going to walk back a comment that we know he meant. God hes a fucking joke. If Geithner and Emmanuel weren't so incredibly horrible Gibbs would easily be the worst individual in this administration.

There has to be someone in the white house who has some sense about why liberals are pissed and can give Gibbs just a simple lesson in basic political science so he maybe one day he will understand that liberals are not going to show up to vote for a democratic president who pushes a conservative/centrist agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
48. Not a compelling case for my vote, Mr Gibbs
Fuck off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. Bzzzttt...wrong! He's assured that your vote is iron clad and not in
need of earning. :evilgrin: However, this new, multiple insult strategery by Gibbs and others is intriguing. Nothing makes me want to serve on local party committees, phone bank, drive people to the polls to vote, etc. quite like this new multiple insult strategery. Why, I've never been so energized, and you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Desperately driven like the Devil's lash was at my back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
50. Inartful? Try fucking retarded as Mr. Rahm would say.
He should turn off the damned tv and get to work for the people who elected his boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
54. When you accept $172,000 a year for your ability to be artful
with words, and you do a thing like this, you should give the money back. His entire job is to be a term of art in pants. Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
58. Yeah, yeah Gibbsy ... Fuck YOU, asswipe! n/t
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 05:47 PM by SaveOurDemocracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
61. Notice he didn't say "innaccurate"
Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
activa8tr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
62. Gibbs can walk back all the public dollars he has been paid... then I will be
listening again.

Otherwise, his credibility as a spokesperson for Obama.....DEAD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
65. I guess "inartful" is the new word for jackass
Who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC