Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Given the publicly expressed opinions of Gibbs & Rahm on liberals,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:32 PM
Original message
Given the publicly expressed opinions of Gibbs & Rahm on liberals,
do you ever wonder what they say about us in private?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. They do not smear all liberals.
They never have.

Certain liberals--like Ed Schultz--I'm sure they have plenty of negative stuff to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. and don't forget Howard Dean.
Obama would do the party a favor by ridding it of those two scumbags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, exactly.
And Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. And he should get rid of Grayson and Weiner while he's at it!
And the whole fucking Progressive Caucus of the House too— who the fuck do those assholes think they are, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #42
56. They've already started to work getting rid of the Progressive Caucus.
Edited on Wed Aug-11-10 10:19 AM by bvar22

I find it revealing that lightweight crooks like Rangel are targeted, and an outspoken Liberal like Waters who may or may not have an ethics violation are put in the Hotseat when there are so many Ultra corrupt crooks available in the DLC.

Evan Bayh's family and Linclon Blanche get millions from the Health Insurance Industry,
and DiFis family directly benefits from Armaments procurement...by MILLIONS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. How interesting--
You seem privy to their behind-closed-doors discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I was just pointing out that (a) neither one of them
has referred to liberals as a group in pejorative terms and (b) Gibbs has indicated that "professional liberal" was a reference to cable television pundits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yes...I guess he never deduced that those cable pundits reflect
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 05:52 PM by whathehell
the views of their largely DEMOCRATIC audience!

What a bunch of obtuse losers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. cable pundits reflect their viewers, or do viewers
follow pundits like sheeple?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. You first......I stated my view.
It seems you view the audience for people like KO and RM as "sheeple'?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Undoubtedly every celebrity has their worshipful fans
Whether they be politicians or news anchors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. So you consider Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow mere "celebrities" ?
that are "worshipped" by their "fans"?


I'd say your just a tad out of touch:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. funny, i've never heard that used in punditry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
52. What cable pundits? The only example that he brought up was a right wing cable pundit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Not the evil Ed Schultz, who is less liberal than I, but who:
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 06:06 PM by tnlefty
supported the Pres. in the primaries

pushed for single payer, then the public option, then tried to get on board with the lack of either and took a lot of heat from his callers for that

stands up for working class Americans

praised the Pres. on his supposed $20 billion until Mike Pappantonio and others told him that the funds aren't really there and that Feinberg is actually on BP's payroll

the guy who just today stated that he isn't buying the administrations talk that it's okay to eat seafood from the Gulf, nor the happy talk about the Gulf, (Bob Cavnar isn't buying it either, so I guess he's on the WH shit list)

I think I'll stand with these guys and many others.

ETA: I forgot pushing for the 99ers to get unemployment benefits...still more inclined to stand with these positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Ed Schultz on balance is okay, but he's a real numbnutz sometimes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. So nothing about what he says or covers...
just calling him a name. Okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Numbnutz? What an intelligent response.
Kind of like saying your base is drug-addicted or retarded.

Rahm -- your wife called... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Ed Schultz has been terrific in speaking for progressive agenda, while Obama is
attacking Social Security/Medicare and public education!!!

Every Democrat should make sure they reset their BS meters much higher after this !!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. just the ones who won't play *their* way.
Bullies -- hypocritical bullies.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
54. Robert Gibbs is a scum. I just learned about what he did
to Howard Dean in 2004 and I now never again want to hear any Party Loyalist tell me that it is NOT okay to say bad things about Democrats, ever again, until they completely disown this treachorous cowardly dirty trickster.

He very well may have helped Bush win in 2004, he certainly contributed.

If you do not know what I am talking about go read madfloridian's OP on the Rec. list right now, or check out her journal under 'Political muggings'.

'do not smear all liberals'! No, only the best ones. And they don't just smear them, they DESTROY them!

I am sickened by these people. To think what was going on back then, how we thought the entire party was unified against Bush. And here we have someone like this, this Gibbs character, running ads claiming that Bush was better than Dean on National Security, and hiding like the slimeball he is until he was forced to have to admit it.

Omg, every time I think of it, AT THAT CRITICAL TIME to have a snake-in-the-grass in our own party while we were trying to fend off the rabid right, and Gibbs was HELPING THEM.

Dean could have beaten Bush ... but not when his own party was smearing and lying about him with their shadowy groups, too cowardly to come out into the light and challenge like men.

Stop defending this scum, he doesn't belong in this party, let alone in a Democratic WH. Her makes me sick.

Go Dean! He would have never stooped to that level.

I used to be puzzled by this WH's vitriol against the base, but now it's all clear ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well I tried to rec this but it looks like the unrec'ers got here first -
I'm sure Gibbs was just repeating what he says every morning with his buds. Not only "inartful" but "fucking retarded" of him to repeat it outside of the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. If he repeats that EVERY morning, he needs to smoke some "bud"
When you talk like that, you ain't doin' nearly enough chillaxin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. The publicly stated comments are enough, aren't they?
It's interesting to note the contempt. Why are they worried about our votes if we are so small in numbers, and marginalized?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. I will not vote for a president whose CoS calls me "fucking retarded" and whose...
press sec. says I'm on drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Rahm didn't call you 'fucking retarded' and Gibbs
didn't say you were on drugs.

Read more carefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
44. Unfortunately -- Rahm did call liberals "fucking retarded" ....
Search ResultsRahm Emanuel: Liberals Are "F–king Retarded" | FDL Action
From the Wall Street Journal: "F—ing retarded," Mr. Emanuel scolded the group, according to several participants. He warned them not to alienate lawmakers ...
fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/01/26/... - 233k - Cached


http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AjQvJ_wcL8v5mH01QwQeTc2bvZx4?p=Rahm+emmanuel+comment+re+%22fucking+retarded%22+liberals+--&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&fr=fp-yie8


Called the liberal strategy "fucking retarded" --

and apologized for it --

http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AjQvJ_wcL8v5mH01QwQeTc2bvZx4?p=Rahm+emmanuel+comment+re+%22fucking+retarded%22+liberals+--&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&fr=fp-yie8


Presume tomorrow you'll be telling us that Gibss didn't say what he actually did say???!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. So you admit to believing that Obama is no better than Bush
...because those who believe that and who believe the President has done nothing are the ones he singled out.

And Rahm Emanuel was referring to a policy, not a collective group of people and not you personally.

And while we're at it Al Gore did NOT invent the internet.

Spreading misinformation isn't impressive no matter whose party is doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. You seem to be under the impression that you are representative of liberals.
You're not. Most liberals approve of the President and are not obsessed with Gibbs & Rahm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Really?
How do you know? Or are you under the impression that you are representative of all liberals?

I don't know any who aren't disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. "I don't know any who aren't disappointed."
Then you don't know many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
47. Because you obviously "know them all", and are the official judge?
Or, maybe it is just that you don't know many?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. We do know that the DLC wants liberals/progressives to STFU ....that's clear...
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 10:13 PM by defendandprotect
and DLC here have worked to try to do the same at DU!

That's how we do KNOW how widespread this liberal/progressive opinion of this

president is -- way beyond DU ---

We've got something worse than Carter on our hands -- and we need a real liberal

Democratic candidate in 2012 -- !!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Uhh... Ok- I agree 100 percent.
I'm growing increasingly suspicious of the term liberal though. It's been co-opted and re-defined a couple of times too many, methinks. Left makes me feel comfortable and ready to fight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
48. +1000% --
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 10:02 PM by defendandprotect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Sure. And I might answer a pollster by saying I support Obama.
In fact, I do support much of what he campaigned on and many of the things he has done, and I know that if I say I oppose him it will be taken as opposition from the right rather than from the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. No kidding. But then, I don't really want to know.
I already went through the adolescent foul mouthed, bad boundaries of my two boys. Once really is enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't reallly care about Gibbs and the 'Man
what I want is a huge majority in Congress of left leaning Democrats so I can get my single payer healthcare. We have to do this or else we can wave goodbye to everything we have fought for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
57. Thats my problem.
I am being asked to vote FOR people who virulently OPPOSE even the Public Option, much less Medicare for ALL.

How do we get closer to Universal HealthCare by voting FOR people who OPPOSE it?

I used to ridicule without mercy Middle Class Working Americans who voted AGAINST their own Economic Interests by voting FOR Republicans.

Now, the Democrats are asking me to vote against my own Economic Interests.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. My ears are singed. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. Fucking retreads.
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 06:06 PM by glitch
I say we work to give them a truly liberal congress that really twists their knickers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. Considering how Congress treated the PNHP doctors when
they wanted a seat at the table during the health care debate, and the White House did nothing about it, I got a pretty good idea about what they think of us. Seventy percent of us wanted a single payer public option on the table, which the doctors were prepared to debate up there equally with the corporate insurance and pharmacy companies. So the doctors were shut out and then arrested when they insisted on being heard. So seventy percent of us were told that they didn't give a shit what we wanted. If that seventy percent also translates into votes Obama and Congress received, I don't think the administration and Congress gets who got them into office. Many of that seventy percent will probably stay home in November and not vote and many might vote for a third party. The outcome in either case will not be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Why, yes, I do believe that Baucus had them arrested, as Graslsey
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 07:42 PM by tnlefty
was whispering in his ear, and nary a peep from the WH about how they were treated. Single payer advocates, be they Dr.s or RN.s opinions not welcomed at all.

No discussion, no nothing, just no debate and arrests. Remember that Gibbs and crew.

Oh, wait, Dianne Watson, is facing the possibility of jail time for her actions during the hearings with BP CEO Tony Haywood. I say wood. cause I think he has a wooden head. Oh yeah, BP, what you thought would be a great PR move to replace the 'foreigner' with the 'good ole' boys who grew up on the Gulf Coast, isn't really working for me. I can despise Dudley, Suttles and the shits that appear on my TV screen even more...

So stop wasting your money on ads and get busy really cleaning up the Gulf.

Oh my, rant off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Good rant. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
50. It was 76%+ of us and rising for single payer .... we were told corporate leverage on Dems
was stronger and more appreciated that public pressure!!

They KNOW who put them in office -- and they're trying to split the left --

and certainly trying to get liberals/progressives to STFU --

look at what's going on here at DU based on DLC pressure for "New Rules" --

And they're certainly trying to make Schultz and other liberal talk show hosts

less effective!!

All the better to do their dirty work behind the "Chess Game" -- little things like

destroying Social Security and Medicare with a majority Republican Panel!!

And other little things like destroying public education -- teachers -- and their union!!

Cheers for Obama and Arne Duncan -- ???

No -- it's disgusting!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
31. the fact they have no fear about saying it publicly shows their contempt and insulation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
37. I think that they probably say you're paranoid...
with a delusional sense of your own importance to think that the White House gives two shits about what people post anoymously on the internet.

Just supposing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
38. I don't need to wonder. Their actions speak for them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
43. At this point it's probably no worse than what I think of them.
What they're saying is probably a step up from what I feel about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
45. I don't really have many further questions at this time, your Honor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
53. Oooh I know! Let's speculate!
that's will be so much fun!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
55. Retarded drug addicts? What more is left to say?
I'll proudly call him an assclown in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC