activa8tr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:26 PM
Original message |
The White House: The AMATEUR LEFT ! |
|
If you haven't watched Keith Olbermann tonight, you DO NOT HAVE an opinion about what the last 19 months have shown us.
Such arrogance from the White House.......and so little commitment to progressive agenda's.
Talk me down.....tell me how Obama's White House could have done less than bow to Republican Health Care demands, and how the most we could have gotten out of the White House was promises to reward health insurance and drug companies, with little or no restrictions, and lots of profits.
Obama should have declared Health Insurance for profit Constitutionally illegal from Jan 20, 2008, onward.
|
Poboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Go away. Ugh. Tell me how McCain's wh might have done better. nt |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Ya think? Then 'someone' needs to stop inspiring it. nt |
Goldstein1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. The issue isn't what McCain would and wouldn't have done. |
|
That's the same old false dichotomy the White House is hoping the people accept.
It's what Obama has and hasn't done.
Do you understand. The point isn't what a Republican would have done but can't, it's what a Democrat should be doing and isn't.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. No, the problem is what the Democrats have done that hasn't been |
|
acknowledged by the thick-headed hacks that know only how to disavow this admin instead of how to acknowledge what the positives are and constructively criticize the negatives.
I have no problem with criticism, but for crying out loud, to be on DU, this prez is junk, and that just isn't true.
|
Missy Vixen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
31. To this administration, there is no such thing as "constructive criticism" |
|
Any questioning of their policies or decisions comes with a heavy price for the person who chooses to speak out.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
15. And that Democrat has told us several times to hold him responsible |
|
But every time we try, people attack us, call us names, and now suggest we are chemically impaired.
They aren't even listening to what Obama told us to do. When ever we do as he asked, they bring up McCain or Palin. It's pretty weird.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
21. Chemically impaired? Please. That's a line you folks are using |
|
way too often.
Gibbs said those who compared Bush to Obama must be on drugs. It was a throwaway line, but I guess not; it's gotten a lot of mileage.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. hey, we did not originate the snide remark |
|
and we damned well won't forget it.
|
izquierdista
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
Well, at least now they are throwing away lines to all the people who have been thrown away....
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
33. throw away or tell tale? |
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:43 PM
Original message |
maryf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. tell me how they could have been much worse? |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 09:37 PM by maryf
why do you think they selected Palin to be McCain's running mate, to guarantee a loss (a shaky bet in the end); the moneyed power brokers wanted Obama, don't you see that yet?
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. Are you serious? You think palin was involved because of |
|
Dems?
:rofl:
OK, maybe. :shrug:
|
OwnedByFerrets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
18. What I have been saying for a long long time. High Five for getting it. |
maryf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 09:51 PM by maryf
|
FreakinDJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
25. Kind of a "Flawed Study" |
|
since more affluent people (Wealthy Americans) are also more racially tolerant too.
|
maryf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
really, are you serious?? Where do you get that from?
|
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
14. Once again: opposition to right wing policy does not mean that we would have |
|
preferred a right wing candidate. It's like insisting that all vegans who don't want a cheese pizza would really prefer a cheeseburger.
|
activa8tr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
16. Go away yourself, if THAT is what you think young people of America deserve from a |
|
President.
I was alive with Truman and Roosevelt
You want to fuck with MY view of "porgressive"?
Like I would EVER vote for Palin, that's all you got?
Try to study the issues, it's no longer 2008, it's 2010....Obama has NOT DELIVERED, get that through your skull, ok?
|
Steely_Dan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
muntrv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Old Gibby doesn't understand that the problem is the professional RIGHT, |
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
aside from a few websites, no one is raking in the bucks as a professional leftie. Contrats that with the right where even a third stringer makes over 100k per year.
|
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. A President can't declare anything "constitutionally illegal." |
|
Only the Supreme Court can do that -- Civics 101. We've got this separation of powers thing going, and as much as we'd like the President to just DO stuff, most of the time he can't. Congress has to pass laws; the SUpreme Court rules on their constitutionality, and the President can only veto them. Bush tried to ignore the other branches of government, and we didn't like it and we complained that he was disregarding the Constitution (which he was). And if our guy does it, it's still bad. I don't want Obama to be a "unitary executive" like Bush wanted to be, just because he's a Democrat.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
7. the problem is the amateurs have not left |
Fire1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Keith was on a roll, tonight! n/t |
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
11. More like the Amateur Right |
|
I'd love it if the embraced policy that is left of center, but that VERY rarely ever happens.
|
Monique1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
22. I am a progressive and was a leftie |
|
but I am being turned off by the self right of the lefties and almost the progressives.
|
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
19. They need lots of practice for sure |
Robeson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Saw that from Keith. The White House being "Amateur Left" was pitch perfect... |
|
...excellent commentary from him tonight.
|
Pisces
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-10-10 11:48 PM
Response to Original message |
28. All of your posts are anti Obama. Seems to me you have a certain agenda on this board. |
JoeyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |
29. So far instead of arguments you've gotten |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-11-10 09:32 AM by JoeyT
a stupid strawman that never stood up on its own (McCain wouldn't have been any better), and an ad hominem attack. I'm starting to think the hardcore supporters don't actually HAVE an argument.
|
Barack2theFuture
(353 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message |