NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:19 PM
Original message |
But WHY does Gibbs not go after the right? |
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. DLC enables the right; they don't go after them. |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. apparently you didn't actually read the OP. |
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
14. But it's the ~DLC~! Be scared...be VERY VERY SCARED! |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
13. Did you ever miss out on the information |
Pisces
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Truth and facts don't matter to the far right or the far left. Ideology or nothing!! |
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. There are probably a handful of :"Far Left" posters on this site |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
L0oniX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
26. We lost an election over a handful of votes in Florida. |
Scurrilous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Thanks NYC Liberal. :thumbsup:
|
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Show me a list of Bush Administration officials mocking the right's base. |
|
Of course Gibbs criticizes Republicans in his job. Did you REALLY think that list of links was a counter-argument?
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. This is the correct answer. -nt |
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. It's a counter argument to the claim that he has done |
|
no such thing. And there is plenty of such claims today.
What makes you think this post was a response to Gibbs' comments that has gotten some all riled up? It's not.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
9. What's that have to do with his attack on the left? |
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Why would you think this post is addressing his "attack on the left"? It isn't. :shrug:
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
20. The way you began your wording. |
|
Why not start with something like Gibbs has a history of attacking the right or Gibbs attacks right wing?
|
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
25. Now you're reduced to parsing the WORDING of his OP title? It was spot-on, given all the "why |
|
doesn't he attack Republicans?!?" shrieking we've heard around here lately.
And while we're on the topic, why don't you address the content of the OP, instead of focusing on the (apt) OP title?
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Because Obama's 2008 voters are not likely to be influenced by them. n/t |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Excellent research, NYC Liberal.. |
|
Gibbs is the good guy..he had a right to call them out..just as he does the rwhacks for their disingenuousness.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Thanks! The facts are always helpful |
SpartanDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the belief in the meme that Gibbs and/or Obama never call out the right/GOP has reached ridiculous levels they do it constantly. Hell, they do it numerous times in a week for the stupid things the GOP is saying/doing.
|
Blue Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Mostly talk, not walk |
|
Tweeting disbelief at Barton or taking swipes at Hannity is great -- but at the end of the day, has the administration creeped further right?
When it comes to certain issues, they're creeping right.
Like Afghanistan. The Patriot Act. Gay marriage. The War on Drugs. Blocking independent science. The Public Education mess. Throwing another $33 billion to the MIC.
I want to see a stronger stance against failed Bu$hCo policies -- why are they validating Bu$hCo by continuing lots of the bullshit he forced on us from 2000-08?
|
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. Problem is, when they speak out, it's "actions speak louder than words." |
|
Then they get criticized for "not using the bully pulpit" and "not speaking up."
When they take action, it's: "too little, too late," "they were FORCED to," "that's great but there's still x,y, and z," etc.
Not everyone does this. There are issues that I disagree with Obama on. But I don't let those disagreements consume me and ignore the accomplishments.
|
Blue Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. I give Obama credit for and admire his accomplishments |
|
Obama is without doubt a far greater president of the people than Dubya was.
I think he'd be even more popular if he moved further left instead of right, and didn't bring the proverbial knife to their gun fight or let them frame the message all the time.
|
Scurrilous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
azmouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 08:42 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Excellent post with great facts. |
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 08:44 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Excellent - and irrefutable. I'll bet that's just the tip of the iceberg if one wanted invest the |
|
time.
Good work! :thumbsup: Kick & Rec.
|
eridani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Great. Now we know who thinks that "Canadian health care" is just as bad |
|
--as the OP list of Repuke BS.
|
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 08:54 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Unbelievable that *ANYONE* on DU would UnRec this OP - it attacks no one, simply provides useful |
|
links to instances where Gibbs went after the Right instead of the "professional Left" - and the former far, far, far outweighs the singular incident of the latter.
What kind of so-called "progressive" or "liberal" could possibly have a motive to UnRec this OP? :shrug:
It would be very fascinating to hear an explanation that wasn't rooted in sheer bitterness and/or contempt for the current Democratic administration. There is none, not one other legitimate explanation, in fact.
Anyone? Anyone? :shrug:
|
lifesbeautifulmagic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
29. totally agree, maybe because the right has |
|
100 minions, and 1,000,000 media outlets and the left has 1,000,000 minions and 5 media outlets.
|
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-12-10 04:03 AM
Response to Original message |
girl gone mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-12-10 04:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
This is all defense, in response to direct, specific attacks on the President. And it's mostly mild defense, at that.
When has he, unprovoked, called members of the right wing "professional critics" and drug addicts?
|
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-12-10 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
32. Baloney - have you even bothered to read through the links? |
|
:eyes:
Did you UnRec this thread? If so, why? :shrug:
|
Snazzy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-12-10 04:26 AM
Response to Original message |
33. Gibbs is clearly a sensitive genius--thank you for the clarity |
|
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 04:27 AM by Snazzy
Hey what has he got to say about military tribunals at Gitmo, the USA torturing people and that now being a fine and acceptable part of the process of military justice?
Oh right, never mind, we're all talking about this bullshit instead.
Carry on!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |