Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Apparently ignoring polls, Blitzer asked: Are ads a sign Clinton camp "is feeling desperate"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 06:17 PM
Original message
Apparently ignoring polls, Blitzer asked: Are ads a sign Clinton camp "is feeling desperate"?
http://mediamatters.org/items/200705150009?f=h_latest

On the May 14 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer asked whether former President Bill Clinton's recent campaign advertisement on behalf of his wife, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (NY), is "the act of a supportive husband or a sign the Clinton campaign is feeling desperate." Blitzer offered no basis for his suggestion that the Clinton campaign may be "feeling desperate" and did not mention a recent Newsweek poll that shows Sen. Clinton ahead of all the other leading presidential candidates in head-to-head races (though within the margin-of-error in some matchups).

Later, CNN correspondent Jack Cafferty suggested* President Clinton "is, according to the polls, a kind of a divisive figure" -- despite Clinton's latest favorability rating, taken at the end of March in a USA Today/Gallup poll, of 60 percent. The previous two USA Today/Gallup polls, from February 9-11, 2007, and June 23-25, 2006, show Clinton with 63 and 59 percent favorability ratings, respectively, while a February 22-25, 2007, ABC News/Washington Post poll and a September 22-24, 2006, CNN poll shows him at 55 and 60 percent favorable, respectively. By contrast, Republican strategist and former Rep. J.C. Watts (R-OK) told Blitzer: "If I'm a Democrat {sic} candidate, I want Bill Clinton engaged as early as possible. ... {B}y and large, I think Bill Clinton is going to be very good for any Democrat {sic} candidate."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rasmussen - Who Has Been The Most Accurate Predictor...
Says that Obama has caught up with Mrs. Clinton. Also, when comparing apples to apples, Obama trounced her in fundraising last quarter.

On another note, she actually seems to have taken a principled, non-nuanced stance on the Feingolod resolution - this is very unlike her. Smells like desperation to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not a Hillary fan, but Blitzer is dumbass.
She has no reason to be desperate.. yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC