Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why doesn't the President get credit for controlling oil spill??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:28 PM
Original message
Why doesn't the President get credit for controlling oil spill??
.



In hindsight, and even James Carville agrees, the President did a masterful job in bringing together all the assets of the government, the Coast Guard, the military, British Petroleum executives, different state leaders and governors, to keep the oil spill from doing great harm to our coast and our environment. Almost everyone, including DU, thought this was going to be a much worse disaster. It was very bad.

But the President was able to get BP to agree to put up a $20 billion fund to pay for the liabilities and losses. That was quite an accomplishment. There were more than 5000 ships and vessels helping with the cleanup in the Gulf. They were able to get more than 27 million gallons of oil and water skimmed from the water. They were able to burn millions of gallons that was accumulated on the surface. They had miles and miles of boons to collect the oil before it hit the coast. Even then, a lot of the oil hit the shore. But, like the economic disaster, it could have been much worse.

However, it is difficult to prove the economy would not have been worse without the President's policies. But, we could see with our own eyes the oil gushing into the Gulf. Most everyone, myself included, thought it would be much worse. The President did a fabulous job in keeping the damage from this disaster to a minimum and he should be given credit for that, in my humble opinion.





.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you think for one minute the republican ass kissing
press will ever give the president credit for anything. Nothing he and the congress has done to alleviate this mess Bush got us in to has been said in the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. +1,000,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. because that would mean giving Obama credit
The Right will never do this.

And his critics on the left are too invested in their criticisms to allow themselves to be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, I can name at least one DUer who called it right
and gave credit to Obama.

Me:

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Jackpine%20Radical/161

And I don't believe I exactly have a rep as a sensible woodchuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. You called it...
well done :applause:

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I remember how many on DU were calling Obama everything for not doing anything
not a peep out of them now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And I remember many on DU saying he couldn't do anything about it
who will now doubtlessly credit him.

We're a funny bunch around here.

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. yes, funny bunch indeed.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. (In order to get that, you'd have to start out with a sense of humor.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. of course I am humourless
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 02:48 PM by Whisp
if I don't get your type of humour.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. one of my favourite was how Obama was refusing help from other countries.
sheesh. which was a big fat (but juicy) lie.

those are some of the same kinds of ideas like Obama taking away Food STamps from the poor, robbing Senior citisens of their SS, being a homophobe and destroying the educational system.
I save myself a lot of time by watching what thesepeople say, then I know the fucking opposite is the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. where do they get this misinformation from or do they just make it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. they look for anything that can be used against Obama
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 02:57 PM by Whisp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. dupe
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 12:38 PM by Rosa Luxemburg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pretty much on the day of the spill, BP was saying it would be plugged mid August.
It got plugged a little earlier.

There's still a shitload of oil in the Gulf and we have NO idea what the long term consequences are.

I do NOT blame Obama for the spill and I think he did as good a job as could be done given what we were/are dealing with. But what sort of credit should he get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Not overreacting and not underreacting.
imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Who are "the shitheads"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is the Velcro president he gets blamed for all the ills of the world/nation
and gets absolutely no credit for all his good works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Aint it the truth.. I dont know why people expect so much from him but so little from other leaders.
Its must be very troubling and frustrating for the President.. I would not blame for not wanting to run again in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. K & R
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. Apparently you have bought the idea that we've seen the worst of the oil damage.
As another poster said, the gusher wasn't Obama's fault so therefore 'controlling' it, if that's what you think has happened, can't be his doing either.

In 'hindsight'? It's a little too soon to be claiming anything in hindsight, as if this was an episode that is now over. the damage is done and the damage is permanent. That oil didn't just go poof. They're finding it in shrimp and crab larvae. If you think that's keeping damage 'to a minimum' you apparently don't spend a lot of time thinking about ramifications to the food chain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You are correct...
in that they did not clean up all the oil and we may see ramifications far into the future.

But, in the present, the oil is not washing upon the beaches. We are not seeing as many wildlife and sealife killed as some may have expected.

There was no good ending to this disaster. However, under the circumstances, I think the President does deserve credit for his handling of the crisis thus far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. So will you be back here admitting you were wrong when the worst does not happen?
Some have been screaming catastrophe for months.. just changing the definition of "catastrophe" as the original catastrophes never materialized. The mindless fearmongering is getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. I dunno did he change into Aquaman and swim down there and plug the damn hole?
It was my understanding that only Aquaman could handle the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. BECAUSE IT IS A DISASTER... we are all doomed....
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 01:45 PM by whistler162
DOOMED I SAY!!!!

No matter what anyone tells you, xecept that it is a DISASTER, is a lie paid for by BP and the US guberment!

PANIC PANIC PANIC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. He deserves credit for acting like a cool-headed grownup.
Imagine President Palin in that situation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. He's no Bobbie Jindal.
Berms baby, berms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think he is getting some credit
But I also think he was just doing his job - sending good people to do their job. It's not like he took a big political risk in sending Chu and Allen down there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
27. Only the blame
No one will give President Obama credit for anything.

Not even some people here.

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. I notice some folks don't like this story line...
I have counted 7 unrecs thus far. :-)

Heaven forbid that we give Obama credit for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. You are catching on kentuck
I mentioned about a month ago that posting anything positive about President Obama is like administering a public Rorschach Test around here.

About half a million rocket scientists voted for Nader over Obama in 2008 and I think every one of them posts here. They are legends in their own minds.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. I haven't hit rec or unrec.
It just seems a little too soon to claim anything yet, imho. Especially in view of the huge effort from NOAA and EPA to kill the reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riftaxe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Possible because it happened april 20th
And his first major acknowledgment of the tragedy was not until 12 days later. After 5 days, the media was already heavy with the just anger and ramifications of the spill.

Leadership means more then taking credit, it includes being on the forefront of an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. First of all, they were looking for the bodies.
The Coast Guard was there almost immediately. Why do you think he was not "on the forefront of an issue"??

It is true that he was not going to accept the blame or responsibility ahead of BP. He got BP to accept responsibility. Remember the little weasel Repub that apologized to BP??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riftaxe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Nice disinformation there.
The search for the 11 bodies of the oil rig workers was suspended 3 days after the event (April 23rd).

President Obama and our administration chose to take a Laissez-faire approach to this crisis, anyone paying attention to the time line of events recognizes this, making it very hard for him to take a leadership credit for it.

It is debatable whether this was a this was a wise choice or not, if the media drops coverage of the results of the contamination of the spill in the next 6 months it will probably not matter. If he tries to invoke it in 2012 it could come back to bite him.

Imagine if he tries to take credit for leadership during this, and someone who was awake and watching the news compares his administrations actions to the dates that events occurred, it could cause serious political harm.

Personally i think he going the political expedient route of hoping that the public forgets about BP, in favor of the next crisis. This is not a particularly bad plan politically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Are you truly that politically naive?
Of course he was not going to step up front and accept responsibility for the spill. He was working to put the blame squarely where it belonged - on British Petroleum. They would loved for him to take the blame. But he was smart enough not to fall for that. But there is no proof that he was not working on this problem from the very beginning.

It's obvious that it pains you to give him any credit at all, politically or otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deveraux Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. Because a huge amount of oil was spilled before it was controlled n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. This crossed my mind also. 2 months ago it was oil spill armageddon. Obama
kept the pressure on BP. He deserves credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I wish we wouldn't drag Obama into this when the status, let alone, the outcome
is still not clear.

I just caught a rerun of Dahr Jamail on Thom's show yesterday. There's MORE crud washing up now, he reports, than washed up in the last two months together. And there's evidence that dead zones are expanding.

Maybe we should lay back a little. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC