Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Mad Men" : Creators of Current Evils

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 03:01 PM
Original message
"Mad Men" : Creators of Current Evils
The show itself is fun to watch for us Boomers (it was our childhood era) , and an eye-opener for the young'uns, but the real-life "ad men" (especially of that era) are largely to blame for our current troubles.

Immediately after WWII, when we were the manufacturing giant of the world, everyone wanted our stuff, and since most of the rest of the world was in re-build mode for at least a decade, to clean up the mess the war left in its wake, we would have prospered with or without the expansion of advertising.

The 50's were a time of mind-expansion and of "experts". Those early ads often relied on "9-out-of 10 <insert your favorite expert here>s say that "Product X" is healthier, shinier, stronger, better-tasting, etc".

Experts told us that it was fun and safe to take a picnic lunch & go watch nuclear testing. Movies were filmed on the radioactive dusty soil because it was perfectly safe. Shoe stores x-rayed kids' feet for a "perfect fit". Sore throats were often treated with x-rays. Paint was leaded...so was gasoline. Science teachers encouraged us kids to play with mercury on our desktops.

"Better Living Through Chemistry" was the theme of the day. Redi-Kilowatt was our little buddy. Everything old/pre-war was just the thing that no one wanted to identify with anymore.

Most people in the US back then were still relatively uneducated. Millions of young men had had their educations truncated due to the war, and it was a time when women largely had a home-ec education.

As all those young men came home from war, eligible for government money, it was inevitable that big-business would notice, and advertising was right there waiting to pounce on the new plan.

The war was a pivotal point in advertising history too, because pre-war, people were too broke to care what was advertised...no money..no buy. During the war, advertising was haphazard, since so much was rationed. It made little sense to waste money on advertising, when supplies were so limited, and so much of people's time, energy & money was going to "their boys" at war. People may have wanted things, but given a choice, they could wait...and wait they did.

The old people who have run Social Security for all its years may have not "noticed" that the Boomers were among us (except for the fact that they noticed all the money we paid in for 50 years), but ad men noticed....in a big way.

They recognized that a two-decade long time of deprivation had come to an end, and that a pent-up demand had been created, and they were ready to take full advantage.

People were used to re-purposing old things, repairing broken things, and doing without many things. This had to change, for ad men to prosper (and to keep the job-engine for all those returning servicemen humming along). Millions of men left for war as common laborers, farm-hands & unemployed, and returned as prospective college men, factory workers with skills picked up the the military, and most of them planned on being much more prosperous than their parents had been. We were all ripe-for-the-picking, and the stage was set for major expansion.

Advertising knows the "seven deadly sins" inside out and had psychologists on retainer, to teach them how better to appeal to all the demons locked inside us.. ...Hungry demons who wanted "stuff".

They knew all the buttons to push. They knew how to make a housewife feel humiliated about her yellow floor wax...How to make a puny young man feel shame about his slight build. How to make us all feel fear about odors, hair, breath, tooth color, hair textures. They knew how to approach our children & trained those kids how to wheedle, beg, cry & even shame us into buying them stuff.

People associate greed with Gordon Gecko, but before Gordon Gecko, there were millions of others (on a smaller scale, though) who coveted "new" and "more". The people who were in the job-force in the 50's had had-it-up-to-here with old hand-me-down stuff, and ad men were happy to oblige us all with a daily field trip through the World of New.

Politicians took notice of the successes of advertising, and the old lapel buttons & placards were no longer enough. TV was an ad man/politician's dream-come-true. TV was new & shiny & everyone HAD to have one, and by advertising on tv, politicians were able to reach more people than ever before.

It was not long before the deal between advertising/corporate money/politicians was signed, sealed & delivered.

We have evolved into watchers, believers, supporters of what we are told to watch, to believe and to support. Who tells us? Advertisers, politicians & TV.

The consumer society we became , was no accident. If we remained content with what we had and were willing to do without the next new shiny, advertisers would make less, corporations would sell less, and politicians would have less campaign donation money. Those three entities are a complete circle around us all. We are hopelessly trapped in the middle. The money they have, comes largely from us, but once it's in their hands, it circulates only between the three of them, and what we get from the money is the trinket we buy with that money we worked for. The real action is in the line between the three entities...not where we are, inside the circle.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. "The Hidden Persuaders" by Vance Packard
Edited on Mon Aug-16-10 03:24 PM by Warpy
is terribly dated now because of its specific references, but it's still an eye opener about the world of the ad man. Making it required reading is the one real favor the school system did me, I might not have found it for years had they not put it on the list.

It's the best introduction I know of to deconstructing propaganda through images since the power of the symbolic world is largely ignored through other works dedicated to deconstructing propaganda.

It should be required reading, period, dated imagery and all.

On edit: it's still available at Amazon. Part of it is reproduced online at http://www.ditext.com/packard/toc.html If you haven't read this classic, do read the chapters that are online. They cover the political persuaders and little has changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think I read that book .. I;'ll have to re-read it..
When my boys were little, I always taught them to look carefully at ads & to analyze what they are really saying:)

It worked for 2 of them, The other one is a "gotta-have-it" guy:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, the "what are they really selling here?"
is the most important question to ask for any advert, whether it's commercial or political or disguised as news.

Usually, they're selling good health, wealth, and belonging and nothing else. The product is only incidental and what it actually does is rarely mentioned.

The best way to start doing this is to watch with the sound off. Watch very carefully. You'll get the point fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I remember finding a copy when I was in high school in the early 1960s
What prompts people to want something hasn't changed much.

Last week's episode of Mad Men dealt with coming up with a campaign for Pond's Cold Cream. Different generations of copy writers are wrangling over if the campaign should focus on woman's desire to get married.

This reminded me of current ad campaigns for a whitening toothpaste. In one ad the woman is going for a job before the cameras and needs to keep her teeth white. But the same woman appears in another ad where she's preparing for a blind date with a guy. She uses the same toothpaste so she can eat and drink what she wants and still maintain a date dazzling smile. The friend who set her up on the date shows generous approval of her white teeth.

The more things change...

P.S. Thanks for the prompt about this book. I just requested it from my library and was delighted to see that it's already checked out. Nice to see it still holds interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I wonder if it's "banned" from high schools
Can't have all those "consumers" getting "funny ideas", can we?

about last week's show:

I talked to my son yesterday and he told me that my D-I-L was having allergy issues, and the doctor finally pinned it on the new skin care/hair care products she had started using. She was won over by the advertising about how "organic" they were. As soon as she went back to Aveeno & Ivory soap, the rashes went away. He laughed because that's what he told her..but she was sure that all the extra money she spent on the new stuff was worth it because they were more expensive & had all these natural ingredients in them:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Just curious - was it Garnier Fructis that your dil was using?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. He did not say...but it was expensive
and it made her itchy .. She's very fair skinned & naturally blond so her skin is sensitive to start with.

Knowing her, she probably bought it at Nieman Marcus:rofl:

Only the "best" for her:)


I almost was not strong enough to use their measuring cups. I did not know that stainless measuring cups could weigh so much:)

She's hard to buy for, & does not like jewelry, so our son got her a diamond-studded bookmark from Tiffany's.. She's a reader:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. LOL about the measuring cups!
No comment on that bookmark but it gives me an idea. I have one of those Bedazzler kits from umpteen years ago. Bet I could make some cute bookmarks with fabric scraps and the sparklies. Hmmmm....

Thanks! :D

Back to the Garnier products and advertising. I have a weakness for the Project Runway reality tv show. G/F products are the main advertiser. I tried the shampoo to use an alternate from the one I'd been using for too long. Now I use it all the time. But the deal is that I was prompted by that program to try it and that's just the truth. Tim Gunn got to the soft spot in my head. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. My dil is sure that her hair is falling out:) (long blond hair ALWAYS sheds)
I also reminded her that as we "age", our hair naturally thins:) She's 36:)

We love the fact that we no longer have to shave legs every day, but forget that our head-hair is not immune from the thinning:)


The bookmark was gorgeous, but I'd be afraid to use it:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't get why "better living through chemistry" is something troubling.
I don't see many people in a rush to leave consumer society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. I highly recommend Adam Curtis' documentary Century of the Self
It's on Youtube...VERY enlightening about the power of adverstising and how it's been used politically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very good. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't blame mere functionaries

Who do they 'create' this shit for?

Follow the money.

Kill Capitalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. For a moment I read "Creators of Current Elvis"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think the fact that those ad men are to blame for many current
problems is a theme of the show you speak of, not a 'but' to balance the popularity, but a foundational point of view of the project. The 'Madmen' are impostures, abusers, drunks, able to manipulate other people's emotions while being entirely out of touch with their own. Don Draper is not even Don Draper, his entire self a construct made out of imagination and mendacity.
And I agree with both you and the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. It's kind of fun to visit the show's forums
you can instantly tell who is young & who is "older".. Don is just now starting to show his true colors.. sexist, loutish, drunk. as were MANY of that era's movers & shakers...especially in the ad business.

to many of them, women were trinkets to be played with, or arm ornaments (wives)..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC