Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In defense of Harry Reid..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:37 PM
Original message
In defense of Harry Reid..
Why are so many people upset over Harry's statement that the Islamic community center should be built elsewhere?

The Honorable Mr Reid is just being sensible and pragmatic, doing what so many posters here at DU seem to want, take the hard and demanding triangulation route in order to please as many moderate centrists as possible and don't stand firm on left wing pony wishing.

We all know a huge percentage of Americans are going to think negatively of any Democrat who stands up for the rights of Muslims to have halal ponies in this country, it wouldn't be sensible or pragmatic to upset so many voters over such a trivial issue.

After all, we have political power to think about, the Democrats could stand to lose some of that political power if they lose too many moderate centrist swing voters and the professional left will vote for Democrats no matter what they do. I mean what are the professional leftists gonna do, vote Republican? It is to laugh.

Harry Reid needs to do some hippie punching in order to demonstrate that he's not too far to the left like all those professional leftists we've heard so much about lately, this is an ideal issue for him to separate himself from the Commie, Marxist, dope smoking Pinko hippies and show some real 'Murkin spine by standing up to those who would see our nation groaning under the shackles of Sharia law.


I recommend everyone carefully check and recheck the calibration on their snarkometers before replying to this OP.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well if a person wants to make their judgment about Reid based on that one
Edited on Mon Aug-16-10 05:42 PM by county worker
statement, I don't think much of their judgment.

I don't agree with the statement but it isn't going to cause the harm that Sharon Angle can unless we let her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly my point..
It's far more important to hold political power than to stand up for some silly principle like freedom of woo.

Principles can't vote, congressmen can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fogonthelake Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw Reid being smart in his statement.....
He challenged the Repugs to do the right thing. It was pragmatic in this sense and I applaud him for his statement of opposition.



...
"The First Amendment protects freedom of religion," spokesman Jim Manley said in a statement. "Sen. Reid respects that but thinks that the mosque should be built some place else. If the Republicans are being sincere, they would help us pass this long overdue bill to help the first responders whose health and livelihoods have been devastated because of their bravery on 911, rather than continuing to block this much-needed legislation."

Read more: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/16/reid-breaks-with-obama-opposes-mosque-near-ground-zero/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_politicalticker+%28Blog%3A+Political+Ticker%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Harry didn't need to take any position at all.
"That's a local issue and something in which I don't need to get involved."

All he had to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am going to continue to watch this thread...
Because I'm not sure what I am seeing. Actually I am pretty sure of what I am seeing, I just want to see it play out before I congratulate you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Want some popcorn?...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bravo
My favorite: "take the hard and demanding triangulation route in order to please as many moderate centrists as possible and don't stand firm on left wing pony wishing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:56 PM
Original message
I understand he's trying to get reelected. He's still fucking wrong on this one
As are a majority of the simple minded fools in this country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think it's all about the Nevada electorate...
...and they are pretty rabid on this issue as far as I can tell.

Now Harry is hardly being a profile in courage with his remarks. Unlike Obama, I think Harry should have just stayed out of it. He was under no obligation to make any remarks one way or the other. Now he has annoyed the base, and the lunatics who are jumping on this issue don't respect his position either because they see it for what it is: pandering.

Bad move, Harry. Wrong on the issue and wrong on the politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC