Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Republicans Now Call For The Repeal of RLUIPA, Which They Sponsored, To Fight Islamic Center?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 11:06 PM
Original message
Will Republicans Now Call For The Repeal of RLUIPA, Which They Sponsored, To Fight Islamic Center?
Many local governments opposed the federal adoption of thee Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), which prevent local governments from restricting the construction of churches. The Act was supported by many evangelicals and Republicans. Of course, while Republicans are demanding the halt to the construction of an Islamic center near ground zero, RLUIPA protects such rights. Perhaps President Obama should inquire whether Republicans wish to repeal RLUIPA.


The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), Pub. L 106-274, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1 et seq. is a United States federal law that (gives) churches and other religious institutions a way to avoid burdensome zoning law restrictions on their property use.

* * *

In religious land use disputes, RLUIPA’s general rule is the most commonly cited and challenged section. It provides:

General rule. No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person, including a religious assembly or institution, unless the government can demonstrate that imposition of the burden on that person, assembly or institution
is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and
is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.
Scope of Application. This subsection applies in any case in which--
the substantial burden is imposed in a program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability; or
the substantial burden affects, or removal of that substantial burden would affect, commerce with foreign nations, among the several States, or with Indian tribes, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability; or
the substantial burden is imposed in the implementation of a land use regulation or system of land use regulations, under which a government makes, or has in place formal or informal procedures or practices that permit the government to make, individualized assessments of the proposed uses for the property involved.
42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-5(a).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. excellent find, ty nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act:

Senate Sponsor: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d106:SN02869:@@@P">Sen Hatch, Orrin G. (R-UT)
House Sponsor: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d106:HR04862:@@@P">Rep Canady, Charles T. (R-FL) Retired

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This Will Be Suppressed Like Bobby Jindal's Sponsorship Of The DOER Act of 2006
What is the DOER Act? The Deep Ocean Exploration Act, which deregulated deep ocean drilling, which lead to the BP oil disaster. This fact has been censored by the corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC