Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Double standard... all the way. WOAH it's a double standard all the way across the media!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:17 PM
Original message
Double standard... all the way. WOAH it's a double standard all the way across the media!

WOAH, woah, WOOOOOAAHHH hohoho!!!! WOO! It almost looks like a TRIPLE standard!




Prop. 8, outing Judge Walker, and the media double standard
August 09, 2010 3:51 pm ET by Karl Frisch

Since Proposition 8 was ruled unconstitutional in a U.S. District Court last week a great deal of the media discussion surrounding the ruling has centered on the purported sexual orientation of Vaughn Walker -- the judge who ruled in the case.

As Media Matters has noted:

Ridiculous attack: Prop 8 judge should have recused himself because he is gay
Wash Times: "Nero, like Judge Vaughn, wanted the community to embrace his unnatural way of life"
Fox's Trotta suggests Prop. 8 judge had "vested interest" in case because of his sexual orientation
Family Research Council's Tony Perkins attacks Prop. 8 judge for being "openly homosexual"
Heilemann: Judge Walker being gay "has become a big thing on Fox News"
It should be noted that judicial ethics experts have said that the attacks on the verdict using Walker’s presumed sexual orientation are without merit.

Now, not all of the cable news chatter has agreed that Walker should have recused himself because he is purportedly gay and in a same-sex relationship but the discussion in general points to a major media double standard.

Radio host Michelangelo Signorile notes that, despite all of the media attention, no one has actually confirmed that Walker is gay. He then goes on to lambast the media for its glaring double standard when it comes to reporting on the sexual orientation of public figures.


More....

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201008090038
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Glad someone is finally discussing this
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's about damn time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. This issue can't have anyone who doesn't have a side.
Edited on Tue Aug-17-10 09:32 PM by napi21
If this judge had a vested interest, so would a straight judge. The best you can hope for is a judge who relies strictly on the law, and that's what Ielieve this judge did. He stated all his reasons and how it tied to the constitution. You can't askfor more than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. His argument was absolutely brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC