Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ONE VOTE saves Blago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bajamary Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:05 PM
Original message
ONE VOTE saves Blago
Edited on Tue Aug-17-10 10:26 PM by bajamary
Source: CBS News Chicago, Chicago Sun Times

After more than six weeks of testimony and almost three weeks of deliberations, a federal jury announced Tuesday that it was deadlocked on most of the corruption counts against former Gov. Rod Blagojevich. One juror said the panel was deadlocked 11-1 in favor of conviction on the alleged scheme to sell the U.S. Senate seat

While on some counts jurors were split 6-6 or 9-3 or 7-5, the most explosive of the charges — that Blagojevich tried to sell Barack Obama’s U.S. Senate seat — came down to a single hold-out vote, Sarnello said.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/2609372,blago-juror-holdout-081710.article

Read more: http://cbs2chicago.com/



It was just ONE VOTE on the jury that sparred the impeached former governor from being convicted of trying to sell the Senate seat.

Thank God we will have another trial.

My neighbor, Rod Blagojevich, is just a small time crook in a big sea of corruption that pales when compared with the corporate powers controls of so called democracy.

We just celebrated the 75th anniversary of one of the greatest examples of the best of American democracy: Social Security.

On Aug 26th we'll be celebrating the passage of the 19th Admendment which was the colmuniation of a 70 year political battle for equal right for women.

We were such a good country that was sold to the highest bidders.

My tragic country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Innocent is innocent and he still has not been found guilty.
No matter how much the MSM tries to insist that he is 10/11's guilty which has to be rounded up to 1.

How do you know that the rest of the jurors were not relying on one brave soul to buck the federal prosecutors and so they cast the "easy" vote, the one that would keep the feds and the MSM from hounding them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bajamary Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He was convicted

Actually, he was convicted of one count that has a fine of $200,000 and a maximum of 5 years in Federal prison.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. He was convicted of lying to the FBI. I did not like it when they got Martha Stewart on that one
and I do not like it when they get Blago on that one. You are supposed to tell the truth under oath before the judge and jury. Since when did the FBI become God in the confessional? This kind of "crime" means that if a suspect did not kill his wife but he lied to the police about where he was that night (say he was shooting pool when he was supposed to be working) he can be sent to fucking jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yep! It doesn't pay to lie to the FBI or the police. If you're so
stupid to do so, then you take the it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nexus7 Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why do you lie?
It was the charge of selling Obama's Senate seat that the jury deadlocked 11-1 on. On the others it was 6-6, 9-3, etc.

See, for example, http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/2609372,blago-juror-holdout-081710.article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bajamary Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. thanks
Thanks for making this correction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bajamary Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. made correction

please reread my post as I made the correction

thanks again to the poster who pointed this out to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Great link. Easy to understand. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DollyM Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. A criminal attorney once told me . . .
that you never put a person on the stand that you think may be guilty. Did you notice that Rod's attorney did not put him on the stand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That's true, but there was a split between his own attorneys.
The old man (msm's words) and his son. The Older atty said stay quet & the son wanted him to testify. Who ows what that means. Rod won today, and althoughhe may be very glib with his words, he just may have hung himself with them. Looks lie the old man was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC