Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Lawmakers Holding Recess Hearing on Oil Spill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:35 AM
Original message
House Lawmakers Holding Recess Hearing on Oil Spill
http://washingtonindependent.com/95084/house-lawmakers-holding-recess-hearing-on-oil-spill

House Lawmakers Holding Recess Hearing on Oil Spill
By Andrew Restuccia 8/18/10 9:36 AM


A key subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing tomorrow in an attempt to sort out varying accounts of the amount of oil that has been taken care of in the Gulf of Mexico. The hearing will also touch on seafood safety, another big issue now that shrimpers in Louisiana have gone back to work.

Expect Reps. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), the chairman of the subcommittee, and Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), the full committee chairman, to go after officials from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency over the report released last week that said much of the oil in the Gulf has been dispersed or cleaned up. The University of Georgia released yesterday a report countering those claims, arguing that up to 79 percent of the oil in the Gulf “remains a threat to the ecosystem” there.

At the same time, the committee has invited an official from the Food and Drug Administration, as well as representatives from the seafood industry to talk seafood safety. While Louisiana opened up its waters to shrimping this week, the Washington Post noted yesterday that fishermen are concerned that any discovery of tainted seafood could severely hobble the industry.

Here’s the full list of witnesses:

http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2106:heairng-on-the-bp-oil-spill-accounting-for-the-spilled-oil-and-ensuring-the-safety-of-seafood-from-the-gulfq&catid=130:subcommittee-on-energy-and-the-environment&Itemid=71

Hearing on “The BP Oil Spill: Accounting for the Spilled Oil and Ensuring the Safety of Seafood from the Gulf"
Hearings - Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
Tuesday, 17 August 2010 16:24

The Subcommittee on Energy and Environment will hold a hearing entitled “The BP Oil Spill: Accounting for the Spilled Oil and Ensuring the Safety of Seafood from the Gulf” on Thursday, August 19, 2010, in 2123 Rayburn House Office Building.

Invited Witnesses

* Bill Lehr, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, Office of Response and Restoration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
* Paul Anastas, Ph.D., Assistant Administrator, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency
* Donald Kraemer, Acting Deputy Director, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration
* Ian MacDonald, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Oceanography, Florida State University
* Mike Voisin, Chief Executive Officer, Motivatit Seafoods, LLC
* Acy Cooper, Jr., Vice President, Louisiana Shrimp Association
* Dean Blanchard, President, Dean Blanchard Seafoods, Inc.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. What is the point?
Shrimpers know when their catch is bad. Why do they need a committee hearing of people who have never caught a fish in their life telling them to stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I imagine the point is to get to the truth. Is there or isn't
there oil remaining in the gulf, and if there is, as scientists in GA have asserted, why were we told otherwise?

It's not about telling shrimpers to stop catching shrimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Then why were they just "invited"
to a recess "hearing" instead of being forced to testify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Congress is on recess, for starters. And that's how it's done
anyway. Subpoenas aren't usually issued if someone needs to testify, unless they refuse to show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Since they are in recess,
then what is the point @ this time? It can't wait a couple of weeks? I mean it's been over 3 months now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:23 AM
Original message
I don't understand why you're arguing. Two Dems are doing the
right thing by calling attention to this. Whether they get the deserved attention is a question that remains to be answered, but at least they're trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Why don't you call the committee and ask them yourself? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Considering they are in recess
nobody will answer the phones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC