Matsubara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 10:10 PM
Original message |
WARNING DIALUPPERS:LARGE IMAGE: Infamous Hustler Falwell Parody - LOL |
|
A blast from the past... In Memoriam:
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What's the story behind it?
Did it really get published in Hustler? Was it around the time of the Supreme Court decision?
Did Campari go along with it?
|
Matsubara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yes it was in Hustler. |
|
It was the reason Flynt was sued for libel. I don't know if Campari okayed it. Here's more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
|
pokerfan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-16-07 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. HUSTLER MAGAZINE v. FALWELL, 485 U.S. 46 (1988) |
|
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=485&invol=46"At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. " he <485 U.S. 46, 51> freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty - and thus a good unto itself - but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole."
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-16-07 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Interesting to see that the majority of the SC agreed with Flynt.
INCLUDING Scalia.
|
pokerfan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-16-07 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. If you've never seen People vs. Larry Flynt |
|
Edited on Wed May-16-07 07:51 AM by pokerfan
it's worth watching if only for the scene late in the movie where Edward Norton as Flynt's attorney pleads his case before the Supremes. A lot of the dialog in that scene is supposedly taken directly from court transcripts.
There is even a point where the Scalia character questions Norton on a point and seems satisfied with the answer.
|
ingac70
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-15-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
wicket
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-16-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message |
pokerfan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-16-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Jerry Falwell: What? Roy Grutman: Yeah, Jerry, he's suing you. Jerry Falwell: He's suing me? For heaven's sakes, on what grounds? Roy Grutman: Well, you xeroxed his ad, and you sent it out in a million fundraiser letters. Jerry Falwell: Yeah, so? Roy Grutman: But you didn't get his permission. And that's copyright infringement. Jerry Falwell: The depth of his depravity sickens me.
|
wicket
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-16-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |