Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Housing Fades as a Means to Build Wealth, Analysts Say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 07:58 AM
Original message
NYT: Housing Fades as a Means to Build Wealth, Analysts Say
Housing will eventually recover from its great swoon. But many real estate experts now believe that home ownership will never again yield rewards like those enjoyed in the second half of the 20th century, when houses not only provided shelter but also a plump nest egg.

The wealth generated by housing in those decades, particularly on the coasts, did more than assure the owners a comfortable retirement. It powered the economy, paying for the education of children and grandchildren, keeping the cruise ships and golf courses full and the restaurants humming.

More than likely, that era is gone for good.

“There is no iron law that real estate must appreciate,” said Stan Humphries, chief economist for the real estate site Zillow. “All those theories advanced during the boom about why housing is special — that more people are choosing to spend more on housing, that more people are moving to the coasts, that we were running out of usable land — didn’t hold up.”

Instead, Mr. Humphries and other economists say, housing values will only keep up with inflation. A home will return the money an owner puts in each month, but will not multiply the investment.


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/23/business/economy/23decline.html?hp


Houses were used by many as a retirement supplement. So much for that meager retirement nest egg for most of us. Combine this development with the imminent social security age increase and the motto is: "Work until you die, slave."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. The walls are slowly closing in on...
...the lower 98 percent of Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. They're always the last to know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. In NYC
But New York housing is still ridiculously overpriced. And I'm talking about Queens and Brooklyn, not Manhattan.
When you look at prices now compared to pre-bubble prices in middle class neighborhoods, and rent to own or price to income ratios, prices are still very high. Here is one stat, in Queens the price per sq ft in 2001 was $65, it is now over $200.
I believe sales are down, but NYC has not yet experienced the collapse that many other places around the country have.
Rents on the other hand have gone down, but house prices have not followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. There was much less bubble construction in NYC than in places like Las Vegas, Florida etc
Edited on Mon Aug-23-10 08:37 AM by marmar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's not true.
In New York they build upward. The amount of new Condo construction (many of which are now rentals) was as big as any of the other boom areas. And Condos in Queens and Brooklyn, especially if you include monthly maint. cost, are as high as single or two family homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Even so, I would bet it pales in comparison to the number of new houses built in places.....
Edited on Mon Aug-23-10 08:55 AM by marmar
..... like Las Vegas, Phoenix and the Inland Empire of SoCal over the bubble period.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. You'd be surprised
Edited on Mon Aug-23-10 09:05 AM by edhopper
tens of thousands of new units and hundreds of large office buildings converted to condos.
Way overbuilt, lot's of empty buildings, many houses sitting on the market over a year, and yet not the crash we've seen other places.
And it should be pointed out that the crash happened in many place that did not have the building boom like those places you mentioned, in places like Ohio and Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh, I know that.....I was visiting my friends this summer.....
and was stunned by the brand new, just about empty condo buildings in Lower Manhattan and Brooklyn Hts.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. "the imminent social security age increase "???????
What did I miss?
Some law got passed that I missed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Sorry maybe imminent was the wrong word
But you can bet the Catfood Commission will recommend it and it will be implemented for people not yet receiving SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm getting really sick of these
"things have changed for good--get used to being poor" articles.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. Don't let 'em fool you
As long as the mortgage interest tax deduction is in place, buying a house will remain a great financial move.

And once you get that sucker paid off (which http://fivecentnickel.com/2009/06/03/how-to-pay-off-your-mortgage-early/">everybody should try to do as soon as possible), you can live in it relatively cheaply.

Those who sold after their house value escalated dramatically a few years ago, and before the bubble burst, made out like bandits. But that's not the only scenario where buying a house makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. ow many people can take that deduction?
We can't. We are both on Soc. Sec. and have no taxable income, but do pay monthly mortgage
( fortunately a low mortgage).
As more and more boomers retire, what happens to their plans to downsize into smaller homes?

How many currently employed can afford to buy a house now?
The supply of houses is reported to be at 12 months, or more, but the supply of decent jobs is decreasing every month.

doesn't matter how low the housing prices go, if your wages are going even lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thank God
Maybe I can afford to buy a house now, if that's the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC