Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beware of steps 'safeguarding' the Social Security System

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 09:41 AM
Original message
Beware of steps 'safeguarding' the Social Security System
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/beware-of-safeguarding-social-security-2010-08-17


PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y. (MarketWatch) -- Contrary to widespread belief inside the Beltway, the Social Security System will not run out of money anytime soon.

In the name of "safeguarding" the Social Security System, the pols are prepared to back such measures as raising the retirement age, hiking income subject to Social Security taxes and reducing the annual cost of living adjustment. This will boost revenues while reducing benefits, thereby keeping the trust fund flush with money.

The high unemployment rate has reduced the number of workers paying taxes into the system, while at the same time it has encouraged many to retire as early as age 62, rather than at the full retirement age of 68.

Once the economy gets back on its feet, income should once again exceed outgo -- at least for a few years.

---------------------------------------------

No Tweaking allowed. The Goldman Sachs boys want our Social Security money so they can speculate in CHINA... this can not be allowed to happen.

Why did Mr. Obama unleash these dogs at a time like this?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good question. My guess is because some corporations are withholding 1.3 Trillion from the economy.
And this is their ransom to release it.

However considering his appointments and since he appointed an old Clinton hack (Bowles) heavily invested in 'tweaking' Social Security, it may very well coincide with his own idealogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fox 'safeguarding' henhouse
is more like it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC