|
Edited on Wed May-16-07 01:25 PM by meatloaf
Aren't we here at DU smart enough to understand context?
I'll admit up front that when I first read that Falwell had been found unconscious my first thought was, "I hope the s.o.b. dies." And, yes a smile stretched across my face when his demise was confirmed. Does this make me a bad person or worse still, no better than a freeper? According to many comments in recent threads many would say yes, but I would argue no and I would base that argument on context.
I did not despise Falwell simply because he was an evangelical Christian, nor because he was a conservative. I despised Falwell because he wasn't content to harbor those beliefs. He made it his life's work to spread his hatred and bigotry. He encouraged millions of others to hate and distrust right along with him, and he did it under the innoculated veil of religion. The type of hatred and bigotry he advocated made it acceptable for Reagan to ignore AIDS, for wingnuts to bomb abortion clinics and murder abortion providers, for Dubya to fund abstinence only AIDS programs, For countless brutal hate crimes against Gays and Lesbians, for Americans to look the other way as the constitution is eroded and replaced by a theocratic state, etc...
It is in this context that I believe that Falwell does have the blood of thousands and possibly millions on his hands. The hatred and bigotry he espoused gave and gives cover to policies that will result in the needless deaths of million who suffer from AIDS, it gave and gives cover to those who would deny Gays and Lesbians equal protection and equal access under the law, which make no mistake will result in needless death and suffering. In this context is Falwell really that different from Hitler, Stalin, or Pol Pot? He may not have pulled a trigger, but he sure as hell made it that much easier for those who will. And no, I don't harbor any illusions that his passing will stop the hate or bigotry he espoused or that someone won't step in to fill the void, but I can hope that they aren't as successful as he was at destroying people.
Call me crazy but I don't think Freepers or many conservatives understand context. That's why they can constantly whip out the Clenis excuse when defending Bush. "B-b-b-b-but Clinton lied". Nevermind the context, nevermind what was lied about, nevermind what's at stake. That's why I'm not worried about what Freepers or Hannity try to make out of the posts here on DU. For those smart enough to understand context I think they can discern the difference between hating for hates sake and hating for actions taken. And, if they can't, are they worth worrying about?
For those worried about hate being destructive in it's own right... I'm not sure this is an absolute so long as the hate isn't taken to an unhealthy extreme. In this case nobody here has advocated killing or assaulting anyone, and I sincerely doubt anybody worried about the Falwell family's well being will be looking to DU for sympathy or empathy. This does not make us evil, this does not make us Freepers, this makes us DUers capable of understanding the context in which Mr. Falwell chose to live his life, and the context under which we celebrate it's end.
* edited for spelling
|