Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Every time someone mentions the Deficit Reduction Committee, aka the "Catfood Commission"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:15 PM
Original message
Every time someone mentions the Deficit Reduction Committee, aka the "Catfood Commission"
I laugh, chuckle and might actually pee a little bit.


Who in their right mind thinks that ANY of their recommendations are going to be made into law?
(You know that takes Congress, right?)




Give it a fucking rest, already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. now I could be wrong...
...but I believe that Congress only gets an up or down vote on their recommendation. And there will be massive pressure by their constituents (i.e. Wall St and right wing billionaires) to pass the recommendation.

So don't relax yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No. Wrong.
Separation of powers. Congress has to draft the legislation based on their "recommendations".

House Ways & Means, Senate Appropriations, Senate HELP, Senate Special Committee on Aging, and on and on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. really?
"the proposed executive order would establish an 18-member bipartisan commission to propose a multiyear plan to reduce annual deficits. The panel would report after the November elections, and Congress would vote on its recommendations in December."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/24/us/politics/24debt.html


Nancy Pelosi sneaked language into the rule that the House is voting on tonight regarding war funding.

Embedded in the rule is the requirement that the House will vote on the deficit commission’s recommendations in the lame duck session if they pass the Senate.
...She’s putting this language into the rule in order to deflect responsibility from herself when it comes to the floor for a vote during a lame duck session, since without her approval that could never happen.

http://firedoglake.com/2010/07/01/breaking-pelosi-sneaks-approval-of-vote-on-debt-commission-recommendations-into-rule-regarding-war-funding/


The commission's report is due by December 1. House Democrats have committed to voting up or down on the package if the Senate passes it first.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Peo9QMAJ2y4J:tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/source-debt-commission-fights-over-freezing-military-pay-slashing-benefits.php+deficit+commission+recommendations+congress+vote&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They did that with BRAC
But that is not the norm. They did not do it with the 9/11 Commission report, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The Prez still has to sign it & he said he wouldn't
touch anything that means privatising or seriously harm SS recipiants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. President also said he wouldn't sign an HCR bill without a public option,
Edited on Wed Aug-25-10 11:31 PM by MadHound
So, there we are. What are you going to believe, the lies of a politician or what he actually does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Obama Can Justify Raising The Retirement SS Age And Reduction In Benefits .......
by saying they don't seriously harm SS recipients. He can say that if they didn't do this - that more harm would come to the retirees. So I wouldn't put my money on his not signing these recommendations should they come from this commission.

What pisses me off is that the poor and middle class have made all the sacrifices in this country and in this depressed economy. It's time for the rich and super rich to stand up for this country and make some sacrifices as well. So raising the cap and letting their Bush Tax Cuts expire is only fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think they will made into law either
BUT....

that does not mean we should be complacent, for if we are, then they could actually enact their think tank masturbation fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. But I don't understand the fear-mongering, either.
There is a reason it is called the "third rail" of modern American politics.


The committee is pure theatre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Any commission is a political tool to control the conventional wisdom about an issue.
They're designed to create conventional wisdom. True, Congress is not obligated to act on their findings. But a commission's findings are meant to provide a "bipartisan" statement representing the "fair and balanced" official word. They very often lead to legislation being crafted and held up in comparison to the template of "thought" they cut out. If there were no "deficit commission," there would be no gvrand unveiling of its findings.

Maybe the best tack for progressives to take is just to poison this well so thoroughly by a sustained calling out of the bullshit behind it before the Commissioners can even dip their bucket in the well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Obama poisoned the well by his selections to the Catfood Commission. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. I do. I'll bookmark this thread. Let's talk next year.
Bring your hat, and some spices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yep, a lame duck Congress completely accountable to NOBODY n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. My favorite was the troll who kept referring to it as the Cat Commission.
She got her 'rest' earlier tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC