Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anthem Blue Cross is allowed to move ahead with rate hikes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 11:08 AM
Original message
Anthem Blue Cross is allowed to move ahead with rate hikes
State regulators find that the firm's proposal meets the requirement that 70% of premiums go for medical care. As a result, they can't stop the increases, which average 14%. Blue Shield also is cleared to raise its rates.


http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-insure-rates-20100826,0,7225011.story

who could of seen this coming

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. We had to drive to the next state to find
an oral surgeon who would take Anthem for my son's wisdom teeth surgery. Not one here would take them - and wanted $2000 UP FRONT for the surgery!! As it was I had to pony up $650 - doable, but it's made getting through the month impossible. I had to "borrow" the money from my son's change jar ($120) to get through the month. :( His dad finally gave me his half a few days ago so I should make it to September. Of course, I had to postpone a number of August bills to pay in Sept, so that means double bills in Sept so that means . . . basically if I don't get a job soon, I am royally screwed. (sorry for the offtangent rant)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I know things are really tough. I'm sorry it's happening.
The number one complaint which had to do with the PO is that there were no cost controls.

The excuse given was that a certain percentage had to be spent on healthcare.

Well, who could have forseen the rising cost of health care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Took me a long time to figure it out
In the end, and I'm not sure it started out this way, Obama's HCR became all about saving the federal government money. In the end they did exactly that, they reduced the rate of increase the federal government will experience over the next 10 years. Alot of that came through medicare and medicaid adjustments. But the CBO calculate that the feds will save a boat load of cash.

However, for the rest of us, the vast majority anyway, are still on the same train wreck of a path towards health care costs that none of us will be able to afford. There was little to nothing to control the costs that are the prime driving force behind the costs of health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You hit the nail on the head
the whole saving money part was thought to be US saving money on premiums etc. All the while they were talking about the government and the health care industry saving money. Everything has a read between the lines clause when they speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I still can't figure out the mandate
It just doesn't add up. They don't really seem to need it. So I'm not sure why it's there, especially considering all the hate and acrimony associated with it. It seems to be an interest in creating a revenue source, except all the estimate are that it's not going to generate alot of revenue. It's too small to actually coerce anyone who can't/won't afford insurance to choose to buy any. I've talked to several that are already planning on just paying the fine instead. There is even a strong belief that more people will qualify for the exemption than even the CBO estimated (which is a fair number to begin with). The population of people that will wait until they need it to buy it isn't all that different with or without the mandate, so the insurance companies must know that there isn't any real payoff for them. The only thing that makes sense, and even I have trouble believing it, is that it is in effect a "trojan horse", where as they can constantly modify the fine and the exemption (or lack thereof) until it truly does become coercive. But in the end, because of the cost of the subsidies, that will cost the government alot of cash in the long run, because they'll have to cough up the subsidies or exempt them from buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's a way to keep insurance companies from going bankrupt
Without a mandate but with the requirement that insurance cover all comers, the fear is people would wait until they get some hugely expensive condition and then get insurance, which now can't deny them coverage for that condition.

Of course, to sane people like us the answer is to expand Medicare to everyone. Though that would take a Medicare premium mandate too for the same reason (there is more expense to Medicare than just the levies).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. We Could Very Well Lose Our Anthem
the small business my husband works for could very well cancel our insurance and this increase will be the reason given.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I hope that doesn't happen.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. As they say on a blog I sometimes frequent: Hoocoodanode? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Of course they'll raise rates. They got HIPPA.
Health Insurance Profit Protection Act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC