Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Richardson Calls on Congress to Immediately De-Authorize the Iraq War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 04:14 PM
Original message
Bill Richardson Calls on Congress to Immediately De-Authorize the Iraq War
Edited on Wed May-16-07 04:15 PM by bigtree
New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson issued the following statement urging Congress to take new action to force President Bush to end the war and bring all our troops home by the end of the year . . .

"We must stop this war and Congress has the power to do it," stated Governor Bill Richardson. "I commend Congress's efforts so far, but there is more that they can do. The Congress needs to stand up to the President and say that any legislation that allows our troops to stay in Iraq for an indefinite amount of time is unacceptable. We must fund our troops so long as they are in harm's way, but Congress also must establish a clear withdrawal timeline and force the President to respect it. Congress should use its authority under the War Powers Act and Article One of the United States Constitution to end this war and end it now.

"The original Iraq War resolution of 2002 did not authorize the war we are now fighting, but rather a war to remove WMD. That war ended when the President declared "Mission Accomplished." This current war is a violation of the War Powers Act, because it has not been authorized by Congress. President Bush has abused the 2002 war authorization by turning a war to remove WMD into an open-ended occupation. Congress should pass a resolution that explicitly de-authorizes the war in which we are now engaged, establishes a six-month deadline for the removal of ALL our troops, and instructs the President to remove them.

"Congress also should pass legislation that authorizes funds for the demobilization of our troops in Iraq. If President Bush fails to sign the legislation, or if he refuses to remove the troops by the deadline, he would be in contempt of Congress and we should take him to the Supreme Court.

"The multiple measures that Congress has proposed in the past few months are each steps in the right direction, but none go far enough. The war spending bill Bush recently vetoed did set a withdrawal date, but allowed the President to leave residual troops in Iraq for as long as he wants.

"Reid-Feingold is another step in the right direction, but it still leaves too many troops in Iraq.

"The most recent House funding bill finances the war through August 1st. This extends the war longer than it should --we can and should de-authorize this war today, and start bringing our troops home tomorrow.

"Recently, Senators Byrd and Clinton proposed a bill that would require de-authorization. I'm pleased to have their support for this plan, but their bill doesn't begin to end this war until October. Additionally, it includes no timetables for withdrawal.

"Iraq is in a state of civil war, and only the Iraqis can stop it. President Bush's policies have brought us to the point where we now have to choose between bad options and worse ones. We need to choose the path that will do the least damage to American national security--not the one that does the least damage to the President who created this catastrophe."

http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48723247_bill_richardson_bill_richardson_governor_richardson_calls_congress_immediately_de_authorize



Governor Richardson has proposed seven steps for removing U.S. troops and ending the Iraq war: http://www.richardsonforpresident.com/iraq

1. De-Authorize the Iraq War: President Bush has demonstrated neither competence, honesty, nor a sense of reality in his conduct of this war. Congress should assert its constitutional authority and pass a resolution de-authorizing the war under the War Powers Act and Article One of the United States Constitution.

2. Remove Our Troops in 2007: Congress should set a military withdrawal date by the end of 2007 and appropriate funds accordingly for the re-deployment of troops.

3. No Residual Forces Left Behind: We must remove ALL of our troops. There should be no residual U.S. forces left in Iraq. Most Iraqis, and most others in the region, believe that we are there for the Iraqi's oil. This perception is exploited by Al Qaeda, other insurgents, and anti-American Shia groups. By announcing that we intend to remove ALL troops, we would deprive our enemies of this propaganda tool.

4. Promote Iraqi Reconciliation: We should promote an Iraqi Reconciliation Conference to bring the factions together to seek compromises and to begin confidence-building measures, including the end of militia violence. Our redeployment will give us more leverage than we have now, caught in the crossfire, to get the Iraqis to reconcile.

5. Work With All Neighbors and Allies: We should convene a regional conference to secure the cooperation of all of Iraq's neighbors -- including Syria and Iran -- in promoting peace and stability. Among the key objectives of such a conference should be guarantees of non-interference, as well as the creation of a multilateral force of UN peacekeepers, should the Iraqis request one. The US should support such a force, but it should be composed of non-US, primarily Muslim troops.

6. Global Cooperation in Reconstruction: We should convene a donor conference to fund Iraq's reconstruction. The United States needs to show the world that we intend to return to our tradition of being a trusted leader, not a unilateralist loner. The process of disengagement is an opportunity for us to show that we have turned the corner, and that we intend to rebuild our alliances, respect international law, and work with the international community.

7. Redeploy to Address Real Threats: We must redeploy some of our troops to Afghanistan to stop the resurgence of the Taliban and to fight the real terrorists who attacked this country on 9-11. While all American troops in Iraq must be removed, we need to maintain a military presence in the region, including in Kuwait and in the Persian Gulf. We must have the regional capacity to use air power, special forces and other means to strike Al Queda anywhere. We do not need American troops in Iraq to perform this essential task.

We also must bring our National Guard home where they are needed for homeland security, and we must focus our energy and resources on real threats, such as nuclear proliferation, Al Qaeda, public health, and global warming.


http://journals.democraticunderground.com/bigtree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sheerjoy Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gotta say
this dude is making more sense every time I see or hear him... my wife said she is voting for him... who knows, he may win me over.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He has good and bad points
Edited on Wed May-16-07 05:29 PM by Breeze54
imho. Bad one's are 3 strikes you're out and the death penalty.
There are a couple of others as well.

Urge Governor Bill Richardson to fill out the NPAT
(last time he did was in 1996)

Governor Bill Richardson - Issue Positions(NPAT)

http://www.vote-smart.org/npat.php?can_id=26964

-------------

Thanks Bigtree! At least he's trying to end this fiasco!!

:kick: & Recomended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sheerjoy Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes
but then they ALL have good and bad. They are politicians!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah but then you have to look at degree's of stupidity and
Edited on Wed May-16-07 05:55 PM by Breeze54
greed and ineptitude and how they've voted in the past. Their track record.

It's going to be a long year..... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sheerjoy Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Oh Lordy yes
you are soooo right....<sigh> I am OUT of the business oncewe get rid of the head Nazi...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R! I'm really liking Richardson. He's not afraid to speak truth to power either.
I'm gonna keep an eye on him..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. He needs to talk to these assholes.
Here are the Dem Senators who voted against the Feingold amendment to cut funding for the war by March 31, 2008:

Baucus (MT)
Bayh (IN)
Bingaman (NM)
Carper (DE)
Casey (PA)
Conrad (ND)
Dorgan (ND)
Landrieu (LA)
Levin (MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lincoln (AR)
McCaskill (MO)
Bill Nelson (FL)
Ben Nelson (NE)
Pryor (AR)
Reed (RI)
Rockefeller (WV)
Salazar (CO)
Tester (MT)
Webb (VA)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hey did y'all see this myspace post from a soldier.
Don't know if it is real but he posted it under his name.


I plan on switching my party affiliation to support Bill Richardson in the primaries, and would appreciate if this message were passed along to Governor Richardson.

I'm sick of listening to candidates tell us what we want to hear, then parrot their own agenda once elected. Hell, I LIKE the fact that some within your own party don't like you... It means you're being honest. I'm tired of serving in a war that I am not allowed to win, while others get rich off me being in danger. I'm tired of politicians saying that if you don't support the war, you don't support the troops. I'm sick to death of half measures, and of others telling me how to live my life. I like that you signed the New Mexico CCW legislation, not because of dumb political games, but because you felt it was best for your people.

I also want a president who recognizes that the government has no business meddling in abortion, one way or the other. Personally, I think abortion is wrong, but I also recognize that I'm not a woman, and I have no right to decide in the matter, and neither does the government. Like you, I worry about the government meddling in such things, because then people's rights become subject to the political winds.

I want our borders secure. I want a candidate with character. I can vote for someone who has one or two issues I disagree with, so long as that person, on the whole, has character, convictions, and the experience necessary to rescue our nation from the abysmal leadership in both parties.


I know several libertarian leaning Republicans that would cross over to vote for Richardson. This guy sounds like one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC