Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Collapse of the American Empire (can it happen in a generation?).

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 07:19 PM
Original message
The Collapse of the American Empire (can it happen in a generation?).
From 2005: http://www.counterpunch.org/sale02222005.html


By KIRKPATRICK SALE

It is quite ironic: only a decade or so after the idea of the United States as an imperial power came to be accepted by both right and left, and people were actually able to talk openly about an American empire, it is showing multiple signs of its inability to continue. And indeed it is now possible to contemplate, and openly speculate about, its collapse.

The neocons in power in Washington these days, those who were delighted to talk about America as the sole empire in the world following the Soviet disintegration, will of course refuse to believe in any such collapse, just as they ignore the realities of the imperial war in Iraq. But I think it behooves us to examine seriously the ways in which the U.S. system is so drastically imperiling itself that it will cause not only the collapse of its worldwide empire but drastically alter the nation itself on the domestic front.

All empires collapse eventually: Akkad, Sumeria, Babylonia, Ninevah, Assyria, Persia, Macedonia, Greece, Carthage, Rome, Mali, Songhai, Mongonl, Tokugawaw, Gupta, Khmer, Hapbsburg, Inca, Aztec, Spanish, Dutch, Ottoman, Austrian, French, British, Soviet, you name them, they all fell, and most within a few hundred years. The reasons are not really complex. An empire is a kind of state system that inevitably makes the same mistakes simply by the nature of its imperial structure and inevitably fails because of its size, complexity, territorial reach, stratification, heterogeneity, domination, hierarchy, and inequalities.


He lists 4 reasons why empires collapse:

1. "First, environmental degradation. Empires always end by destroying the lands and waters they depend upon for survival, largely because they build and farm and grow without limits, and ours is no exception, even if we have yet to experience the worst of our assault on nature."

2. "Second, economic meltdown. Empires always depend on excessive resource exploitation, usually derived from colonies farther and farther away from the center, and eventually fall when the resources are exhausted or become too expensive for all but the elite. This is exactly the path we are on-peak oil extraction..."

3. "Third, military overstretch." (This really needs no explanation.)

4. "Finally, domestic dissent and upheaval. Traditional empires end up collapsing from within as well as often being attacked from without..."

Well, that was from 5 years ago from the left. Here is a prediction of the collapse of the American Empire from this year from the right (must be 'right' because he disagrees with Paul Klugman): http://theburningplatform.com/blog/2010/07/06/empire-on-the-edge-of-chaos/

ASPEN — The Aspen Institute never promised that all the big notions aired at its popular Aspen Ideas Festival will be full of hope and inspiration.

The sixth annual festival opened with a sobering vision of the future from financial historian and Harvard professor Niall Ferguson, who declared that history indicates the United States is an empire “on the edge of chaos.”

“My working assumption is that the financial crisis that began in the summer of 2007 has accelerated a fundamental shift in an economic balance of power,” Ferguson told a near-capacity audience in the Greenwald Pavilion, which holds 750 people.

Even before the crisis, Goldman Sachs predicted that China would overtake the United States as the world’s economic superpower by 2027, according to Ferguson. “The financial crisis has unquestionably hit the U.S. much harder than China,” he said.

And American politicians don’t have a sense of urgency, Ferguson contended. They feel the country can limp along for another 20 years or so in its current financial health without making tough decisions about fiscal policy. He believes they are wrong. The federal government’s debt has grown so large in the past decade that the United States will inevitably devote an increasing amount of taxes to it. Meanwhile it’s facing a greater burden through the Medicare and Social Security programs as Baby Boomers age. It’s also currently fighting two wars. All that while revenues have plummeted in the recession.



He goes on to add:

To add to the doom and gloom, Ferguson said the collapse could come much quicker than people realize.

“Most empires collapse fast,” Ferguson said. “They’re complex systems. They exist on the edge of chaos. It doesn’t take much to tip them over, and when they tip over, they fall apart really quickly.”

He cited the Soviet Union as an example and noted Rome’s collapse happened in just a generation.

If the United States fades as a world economic and military superpower, Ferguson sees dire consequences, regardless of whether China replaces it. One result of the U.S. loss of power, he predicted, is the greater Middle East “spiraling out of control.”



I wonder if the Romans realized they were in the decline and fall of their empire while it was happening? I suppose we are like the other empires in believing it has happened to others, but it will never happen to us.

You know we are in trouble when there is agreement from both political extremes. Not being in the "don't worry, be happy" everything will turn out ok pollyanna crowd I believe I am living in the twilight of the America as we know it. I think that just even climate change alone will do us in because not only is it happening and will not be stopped, I don't see anything being done to prepare for its consequences. In fact I've even heard the deniers question if we have any obligation to future generations concerning climate change. Meaning, let's rape and pillage the Earth and let them worry about working it out.

In 20 or 30 years from now when I am an old duffer I would love to be wrong about all of this, but I doubt it. A 300 year run(if that)--I wonder what will come after it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R for "May you live in interesting times..."
WE are certainly witnessing the fall of the empire for
all the reasons stated in your post.

The party is over.
Time to live like the rest of the world.
I predict most will go down kicking and screaming, totally unprepared.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another from the left from 2008:
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts05132008.html

From "How Empires Fall", Paul Craig Roberts laments and predicts:

In truth, American power is already broken, and the country is already lost.

The country is lost, because the brownshirt Bush Regime has destroyed the US Constitution with the complicity of the opposition party and the federal courts. There is no organized power that can restore the Constitution or even much concern that it has been overthrown.

The country is broken, because American capitalists have moved offshore so many US manufacturing, engineering, and research jobs that US imports now exceed US industrial production. American dependency on imported manufactured goods, advanced technology goods, and energy is astounding.

Moreover, the dependency is escalating dramatically. In March 2002, prior to Bush’s decision to impose Israel’s will on the Middle East, oil was $25 a barrel. Today oil is $125 a barrel, a five-fold increase that has seen our oil import bill rise from $145 billion in 2006 to $456 billion presently, a $300 billion addition to a trade deficit that was already running $700-$800 billion annually.

There is no possibility of the US closing its trade deficit. The US is able to survive such enormous deficits only because the US dollar is the world reserve currency. This role for the dollar is nearing an end as the world looks for more stable stores of value. Although oil is still nominally priced in dollars, in reality it is being priced in euros as oil producers raise the dollar price with a view to keeping their oil revenues at a constant purchasing power in euros.


Just think, that was from 2 years ago and how worse things are now. How art the mighty fallen. Evidently, like people, countries and empires have a lifespan and when it is reached, it is reached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. we could hand over power to the Canucks.
it's not to late eh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why would they want it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Soviet Union
went broke fighting the Cold War. We will fall apart as a nation because of that too. Our defense budgets have sky rocketed since the end of the Cold War but our population cannot support it without jobs. They are going to China and India.

Americans see what is happening and are angry - some turn to the tea party and others to progressive solutions. But when the anger subsides, there will be cynicism and that will make us just like citizens of dictatorships, the ex-Soviet Union and China.

The only thing holding us up at this point is the myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've been saying this for over five years now
it will happen IN MY LIFETIME! In fact I will not be shocked if it happens before 2020...

And it will be damn sudden for most people.

At that point the US could go into five to seven successor states... or survive as one nation, inwards looking nation, poor nation... and isolationist nation... I am almost betting on the successor states though... we have way too many cultural differences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ecotopia vs. Jesusland
I, too, see fractured states developing. But I fear that the mini-nations will be so driven by ideological purity that folks in the lumpy middle won't really have a home.

I certainly wouldn't want to live in Jesusland, but I also wouldn't want to live in Ecotopia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I just hope I end up on the "right side of the line."
to be honest.

But I expect the harsh ideological divide to go down fairly fast as... the needs to survive as single nations take hold... but I also expect a few of those nations NOT to have open borders with each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Fanatics from either extreme are not too accepting of those whose opinions differ from theirs.
For those who are convinced that they are absolutely correct they will not consider when they might be mistaken and they will rule with an iron rod both certain they are either doing God's or Mother Earth's will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. I started thinking about this when I heard David Gergen say that history has seen empires collapse
in a generation. We all know about collapsed empires of history but here in the U.S. we somehow believe we will be immune to that kind of demise.

It seems that empires eventually collapse in one way or another, many in a similar and seemingly predictable manner, but with the people taken unawares. History repeats itself probably due to human nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You saw the first very early sings in the 1980s
when silently things like steel production started to move away from the US.

Paul Kennedy's book is a must if you are interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Collapse of the American Empire: swift, silent, certain"
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-rise-and-certain-fall-of-the-american-empire-2010-03-09?pagenumber=2

'The Consummation of Empire' focuses us on Ferguson's core message: At the very peak of their power, affluence and glory, leaders arise, run amok with imperial visions and sabotage themselves, their people and their nation. They have it all.

But more-is-not enough as greed, arrogance and a thirst for power consume them. Back in the early days of the Iraq war, Kevin Phillips, political historian and former Nixon strategist, also captured this inevitable tendency in Wealth and Democracy:

"Most great nations, at the peak of their economic power, become arrogant and wage great world wars at great cost, wasting vast resources, taking on huge debt, and ultimately burning themselves out." We sense the "consummation" of the American Empire occurred with the leadership handoff from Bill Clinton to George W. Bush.

Unfortunately that peak is behind us: Clinton, Bush, Henry Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Sarah Palin, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney and all future American leaders are merely playing their parts in the greatest of all historical dramas, repeating but never fully grasping the lessons of history in their insatiable drive for "economic progress," to recapture former glory ... while unwittingly pushing our empire to the edge, into collapse.


More at the link. It's an interesting read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's like the NAZIs won World War II.
In their race to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of the few, the BFEE did more to hurt the future of this nation than Hitler, Stalin and Mao combined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. From post #2:
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts05132008.html

In a new book that will infuriate the fake conservatives who inhabit the Republican Party, Patrick J. Buchanan documents how British self-righteousness, delusion, and hubris destroyed both the British Empire and Western ascendancy in two unnecessary wars launched by a small cabal of morons that ruled Britain

Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War shows that the two world wars that destroyed European civilization began when England declared war on Germany, thus dragging in the Empire, Commonwealth, and United States. This was a strategic blunder unparalleled in history. Mighty Britain emerged from World War II as an American dependency.

Buchanan cites such British notables as F.J.P. Veale, B.H. Liddell Hart, and C.P. Snow to document that it was Winston Churchill who committed, in Veale’s words, “the first deliberate breach of the fundamental rule of civilized warfare that hostilities must only be waged against the enemy combatant forces.” It was Churchill, not Hitler, who first targeted civilian populations in World War II and caused the structure of civilized warfare to collapse in ruins.

The Americans quickly adopted Churchill’s criminal policy of attacking civilians, culminating in the outrageous use of nuclear weapons against two Japanese cities, the slaughter of Vietnamese civilians, and the ongoing slaughter of Afghan and Iraqi civilians.
A popular American myth is that “the greatest generation” saved the world from Nazi tyranny. As Buchanan points out, the fact of the matter is that the Normandy invasion in June 1944 played little, if any, role in Germany’s defeat. By the end of 1942 Hitler had lost World War II at Stalingrad, long before any American troops appeared on the scene. What the Normandy invasion achieved 18 months later was to keep the Red Army from over-running all of Europe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. I am rather sick of this Imperialistic bullshit...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Sick of it or not, it is what it is.
Not to worry, though. It's likely coming to an end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. The fall of the empire began with Reagan.
Reagan plunged the nation into massive debt, both public and private.
Reagan began the push for off shoring major industries, such as steel and textiles. It was under Reagan that foreign car manufacturers took a hold in the US markets. In all of theses cases, there was no reciprocity.
The US is importing more than it exports. The trade deficit is a much greater threat to us than the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. Considering that the USA exports death and destruction globally,
I welcome the collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes, I suppose there are those who would say we will be getting what we deserve.
Unfortunately many millions who had nothing to do with the USA export of global death and destruction will suffer, but then it's the innocent who always seem to suffer the most. Because of that I certainly do not welcome the collapse of this nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Collapse of this nation, no.
Collapse of the American Empire, yes.

Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. At this point it would be hard to separate the 2 and not without painful consequences.
The rich and the powerful never have to face the same painful consequence as the poor and needy do, even now. If the American empire collapses there will be some very painful economic consequences as well as painful societal consequence with that kind of upheaval.

So I don't believe there is a big difference for the average person on the street just trying to get by however they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. So you are pro-empire? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It is an empire whether I am pro or not. It is what it is.
If the empire collapses within a generation it will be the little people who will suffer at its destruction. It's their lives which will be mostly impacted. I in no way wish or welcome a sudden collapse if there can be change, but historically it would seem that empires have a lifespan and they tend to end rather not nicely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I am not convinced. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Well, there's not much more to say then, is there? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. An analysis of Facebook "friending" shows how the USA might divide..
http://petewarden.typepad.com/searchbrowser/2010/02/how-to-split-up-the-us.html



As I've been digging deeper into the data I've gathered on 210 million public Facebook profiles, I've been fascinated by some of the patterns that have emerged. My latest visualization shows the information by location, with connections drawn between places that share friends. For example, a lot of people in LA have friends in San Francisco, so there's a line between them.

Looking at the network of US cities, it's been remarkable to see how groups of them form clusters, with strong connections locally but few contacts outside the cluster. For example Columbus, OH and Charleston WV are nearby as the crow flies, but share few connections, with Columbus clearly part of the North, and Charleston tied to the South:


Some of these clusters are intuitive, like the old south, but there's some surprises too, like Missouri, Louisiana and Arkansas having closer ties to Texas than Georgia. To make sense of the patterns I'm seeing, I've marked and labeled the clusters, and added some notes about the properties they have in common.

Stayathomia

Stretching from New York to Minnesota, this belt's defining feature is how near most people are to their friends, implying they don't move far. In most cases outside the largest cities, the most common connections are with immediately neighboring cities, and even New York only has one really long-range link in its top 10. Apart from Los Angeles, all of its strong ties are comparatively local.


More at the link..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. An interesting map, thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
22. climate change will speed up everything including empires


as one after the other countries go bankrupt because of the weather.

we are watching Pakistan go bankrupt now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. a million people here---a million people there.. all moviing because their land won't sustain them
a recipe for mass-chaos, because people in places on the receiving end will not be happy:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC