Va Lefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 02:13 PM
Original message |
It's ok for Beck to say "no signs", but let someone else say it and it's censorship!! |
|
A sign ban at an opponent’s town hall is a major threat to freedom of speech; a sign ban at a Beck rally is an important rule in order to keep the event on message. http://www.bluevirginia.us/diary/1547/tea-partiers-demand-signs-at-perriello-events-not-at-beck-rally
|
Ernesto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
1. IMHO.... beck did this to prevent national laughter. |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-29-10 03:23 PM by Ernesto
Lack of spelling & grammar skills are NOT a signs of mental sophistication. http://community.livejournal.com/ontd_political/3983339.html#cutid1
|
The_Commonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. It was DEFINITELY to prevent national laughter! |
|
And I'm glad there were no signs. We'd be spending the next month chuckling about them. And that has gotten old...
|
TheCowsCameHome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
2. What's the point of having signs if the attendees can't read? |
|
Beck may have a point.:rofl:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:20 PM
Response to Original message |