kratos12
(221 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 02:58 PM
Original message |
A simple law re: Military spending would create a massive stimulus |
|
Simply pass a law that stipulates that ALL the parts and raw materials that go into building our arsenal be manufactured in the USA.
Easy to understand.
Creates jobs.
Patriotic.
Let the Repukes and their corporate cronies try to explain to the Teabag crowd why it's important for the tailfin of an F 16 to be built in China.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Not sure if we have all the raw materials... Other than that aren't they manufactured here? |
kratos12
(221 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
But if you give the MIC a little leeway to import some raw materials they will somehow exploit that into importing whole chunks of weapons systems.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
The 29 largest publicly traded defense contractors increased their use of offshore subsidiaries by 26 percent from 2003 to 2008, the Jan. 26 report states. http://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2010/01/28/defense-contractors-offshore-gao.aspx
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. as I understand it, quite a lot of "raw materials" comprise most of the exports |
|
of this country ...
and the "raw materials" come back as "finished products" ...
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'll take it one step further |
|
and argue that energy policy is a national security issue, so we need to take at least half the funds earmarked to build our arsenal and put it into renewable & alternative energy technology.
|
Raster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Raster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The military already consumes far more than it's fair share. Better to spend those funds on |
|
national infrastructure: education, energy, water, and transportation. But I do see your point. *IF we are going to spend any national treasury on the American military, let it be in America.
|
kratos12
(221 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
But in the short run the political argument for "made in America" is far easier to make then to cut defense spending.
|
Raster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
Taitertots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
9. It only creates the illusion of stimulus |
|
Creating stuff people want/need is a stimulus. Creating bombs is just wasting money.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Yep. There's no value with them just sitting there, and... |
|
negative value when they actually get used. Consider the maintanence and fuel costs, and weapons are one of the least valuable things you can produce.
|
Taitertots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. We should count them against GDP instead of toward GDP |
|
Call it "waste adjusted GDP".
|
kratos12
(221 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Would you at least agree that |
|
paying other people in other countries to make these things is worse than if we make em oursleves?
The upside would be a more people employed, and less taxpayer cash leaving our shores, thats at least something.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Sure, if those are the choices (which they are). |
|
Right now, Dayton OH would have absolutely no economy if it weren't for defense contracts.
|
hansberrym
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I only we could make the Tea party crowd understand |
|
Let the Repukes and their corporate cronies try to explain to the Teabag crowd why it's important for the tailfin of an F 16 to be built in China.
The answer: its only important for the new world order. The Tea party might come around if they saw that remaining on the same side as the neo-cons is a far worse choice than finding common ground with Dems.
Also it might help if we stop calling them teabaggers.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |