Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Female Factor: Will three women really change the court?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 09:04 PM
Original message
The Female Factor: Will three women really change the court?

Paul J. Richards / AFP-Getty Images; Photo by Mark Wilson / Getty Images


Much has been made of the fact that Elena Kagan’s ascent to the Supreme Court means that for the first time in American history there will be three women on the high court. But beyond the fact that the court will be slightly more representative of the American people, and the possibility of yet more white lacy scarves from on high, what does the difference between having one, two, or three women at the court really signify?

Social scientists contend that the difference is more than just cosmetic. They cite a 2006 study by the Wellesley Centers for Women that found three to be the magic number when it came to the impact of women on corporate boards: after the third woman is seated, boards reach a tipping point at which the group as a whole begins to function differently. According to Sumru Erkut, one of the authors of that study, the small group as a whole becomes more collaborative, and more open to different perspectives. In no small part, she writes, that’s because once a critical mass of three women is achieved on a board, it’s more likely that all the women will be heard...

Nobody has been a stronger advocate for the need to reach a critical mass on the court than Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. While she is usually reticent about all things soft and snuggly, she has been ever more vocal about the lack of women on the court. As she explained to Mark Sherman of the Associated Press in early August, at least once every term for the 13 years they shared the bench, someone arguing a case would mistake her for Sandra Day O’Connor or vice versa. Last term nobody mistook her for Sonia Sotomayor, however, and she contends that the days in which the first two women were “curiosities” are finally over.

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/30/can-three-women-really-change-the-supreme-court.html


Now we just need a couple more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Women bring a much-needed difference of perspective. Very interesting study about critical mass....
... on boards being 3. I very much hope that Obama gets to make another appointment and chooses to do so with an additional woman. Everyone speculates about Ginsberg because of her health issues, but if we are very, very fortunate someone like Fat Tony will decide to spend more time with his family.

Hekate

just a note: When I read the OP there were 3 Recs. I Recc'd it -- and the number remained 3. Why would someone unrec this article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. An ode to "Three as the Magic Number" from Schoolhouse Rock
Schoolhouse Rock - Three is a Magic Number
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA69pmhrBiE&feature=related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have a feeling that we might soon have a female chief justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Huh?
I hope so but it seems extremely unlikely. Why do you have that feeling - just random or something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ginsburg's not going to be there too many more years
Even if she overcomes her health issues, she's getting up there in years. I have doubts that she'll be replaced by a female Justice, especially if she doesn't resign at the end of the Court's next term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC