Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Economic Recovery is Dead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 01:50 PM
Original message
The Economic Recovery is Dead
August 31, 2010

The Recovery is Dead
The Backward Slide Into Recession
By MIKE WHITNEY

The economy is sliding backwards into recession. Ongoing deleveraging has slowed personal consumption and trimmed 2nd quarter GDP to a revised 1.6 per cent. As Obama's fiscal stimulus dries up and the private sector slashes spending, demand will continue to collapse pushing more businesses and households into default. The economy is now caught in a reinforcing downward cycle in which dwindling fiscal and monetary support is shrinking the money supply triggering a slowdown in activity in the broader economy.

Far right policymakers have shrugged off increasingly ominous economic data, choosing to pursue their political aims through obstructionism. Their goal is to block countercyclical measures that will boost activity, lower unemployment and narrow the output gap. By torpedoing the recovery, GOP leaders hope to take advantage of anti-incumbent sentiment and engineer a landslide victory in the midterm elections. But the timing could not be worse. The economy is in greater peril than most realize and badly in need of government intervention. As the current account deficit continues to widen, the global system inches closer to a major currency crisis. Ballooning trade imbalances signal that a disorderly unwinding of the dollar is becoming more probable. If the dollar drops precipitously, US demand for foreign exports will fall and the world will plunge into another deep slump.

The banks are not prepared for another wave of defaults, foreclosures and write-downs. Bank lending continues to shrink and the system is still fragile. A sudden turnaround in the equities markets would expose the banks to severe losses and force the Fed to provide emergency liquidity for wobbly financial institutions. The solvency of the banking system is largely public relations hype. The fake stress tests merely obfuscated critical details about the true, mark-to-market value of their assets. The nation's biggest banks are still wards of the state.

Much of the rot at the heart of the financial system remains hidden from view. Accounting sleight-of-hand, gigantic liquidity injections, and regulatory forbearance have all helped to perpetuate the fraud. The Fed continues to divert capital into zombie institutions which provide no tangible public benefit. Low interest rates, government guarantees on bonds, interest payments on reserves, the Fed's discount window, and the myriad lending facilities are some of the perks, subsidies, inducements and corporate welfare given to the banks at taxpayer expense. In return, the banks provide nothing; not even sufficient credit to generate another expansion. In its current configuration, the banking system is a net loss to society and a significant drag on growth.

The Fed does not have the tools to fix the ailing economy. Quantitative easing can lower rates and keep asset prices inflated, but it cannot increase demand, reduce the output gap or lower unemployment. Only fiscal stimulus can do that and policymakers have rejected that option. The US is now facing a protracted period of high unemployment and subpar economic performance punctuated by infrequent stock market rallies and predictable bursts of optimism. The recovery is over.

Read the full article at:

http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney08312010.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. IBTCL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. IBTCL would be the: Infofish Bangladesh Trading Corporation Ltd.

No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I didn't know what IBTCL meant and found the company doing a internet search!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. Hey! Your post showed up 3rd on Google
search for IBTCL.

I still don't get it. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
unrecc-ing team out in full force today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. +1 to 0. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMuse Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. They are more than willing to burn the house down
In order to try and score political points and win an election. This is their plan. Do nothing, when it crumbles, blame Obama. They don't care who gets hurt, or who suffers.

The Democrats needed to realize this earlier on. They need to stop allowing themselves to be bullied. They want to filibuster...well actually make them do it. Make them stand there and talk, and talk, and talk. Don't just let them threaten it and back away because you don't have 60.

Play hardball. They are, and it is going to cost us. Dearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Apparently there are "cheerleaders" on "our side"
Who want to see failure too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rec to +1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is an op-ed...
With no supporting documentation.

Opinions are like assholes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. ...every thread has one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thanks for illustrating... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. A personal attack, even an indirect one is unwarranted.
Your intent was very clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Now here at the Rock we have two rules. Memorize them until you
can say them in your sleep. Rule number one: obey all rules. Rule number two: no writing on the walls.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. "Lazy posters" is name calling... so is the other...
As to doing due diligence, that is and has always been the responsibility of the person who posts numbers as fact.

Shirking your responsibility isn't near as nasty as your name calling, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. This op-ed has its sources cause I said it did /sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. And it's somehow the responsibility of the reader...
to give links, do due diligence, etc.

What a world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. We're talking DU protocol here...
Not some stupid crap you made up. But thanks for playing really bad analogy anyway!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Here's a better one
2 + 2 = 4

http://us.metamath.org/mpegif/mmset.html

On a politically current board such as DU, there is an assumed familiarity with the current socio-economic issues of the day. If every poster has to prove the obvious to every intellectually incurious or incompetent trumpeting their ignorance, the board would become tedious and uninformative in the extreme. No reflection on you of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I hope you're having fun...
Your thinly veiled insults are really beginning to bore. And they have no basis in fact, much like the OP. Regardless of the bile spewed, DU has a long standing history of presenting links with assertions, and the onus is on those who assert. No matter how crafty you think you are being, you're not.

Now please, leave me alone. I don't have time for your nonsense.

Final warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. So you're opposed to the writers proposal for more fiscal stimulus because .....?
Edited on Tue Aug-31-10 04:29 PM by Better Believe It

And you think the economic "recovery" is moving right along and gathering steam because ....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I never said anything of the sort and you know it...
I was merely asking for proof of an assertion made in an Op-Ed... anyone who has been around DU for any amount of time knows and understands this is standard operating procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Well, do you mind indicating what "assertions" you disagree with and why?

Will you do that, or not?

And it would be real nice if you can back up any criticisms you have with some hard facts.

OK?

The millions of unemployed workers and anyone who has been following economic developments understands that the economy is stalling out. However, if you disagree with the author and believe the economy is once again booming and that happy days are here again, please provide some evidence of that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. If they tried to do that....
people would be able to discuss the thread. Can't have any of that on a discussion board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. I was discussing meta...
Is that so hard to understand?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. Please don't put words in my mouth... your assumptions are ridiculous...
I was having a meta conversation here, pure and simple. If you cannot understand that, I can't help you... nor can any amount of conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. So what the hell is a meta conversation and how can I participate in a pure and simple one?
Edited on Wed Sep-01-10 09:14 PM by Better Believe It
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Here you go. Take some time to listen, read and learn.
Pay special attention to part 4 of this 5 part series-

To rob a country, own a bank
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sA_MkJB84VA&feature=related

Bill Black Interview: The Great Global Bank Robbery, Part 2

"This regulatory rot began in the U.S. under President Reagan (who demonized regulation and regulators), was reduced under the first President Bush, and began to decay again under President Clinton. Europeans’ first thought when they hear the name “Gore” is probably global climate change, but when he was Vice President his priority was “reinventing government.” The premise of reinventing government was that it needed to be fundamentally changed to more closely resemble a private corporation and to partner with private firms. Financial regulators were instructed to refer to the banks and S&Ls they were supposed to regulate as their “customers.”

Former OTS Director John Reich, who served from 2005 to 2009, referred to WaMu Chief Executive Kerry Killinger as “my largest constituent” in a 2007 e-mail.

Reich also appears in the signature photo of the U.S. contribution to the global crisis. The star of the photo is “Chainsaw Gilleran” (then the OTS Director). (The OTS is supposed to regulate S&Ls.) He is holding a chainsaw. The next three individuals are the top U.S. banking lobbyists, and Reich, then Deputy Chair of the FDIC, rounds out the group. They are all grinning. Everyone but Gilleran is holding pruning shears. They are posed over a pile of federal regulations and the message they are sending is that the industry/anti-regulator partnership will work together to destroy financial regulation. Well, “Mission accomplished!” The anti-regulators were so incapable of shame that they were proud of this tableau (which most resembled Soviet agitprop) and placed it in the 2003 annual report of the FDIC, which your readers can access online. It is no surprise that the federally regulated (sic) financial institutions which produced the worst frauds (or, at least, the worst we know of at this point) were S&Ls."

"...We face recurrent, intensifying economic crises (and economic stagnation for the working and middle class in the developed West) because our financial elites are unworthy. They are too often outright criminals - control frauds. They have no sense of accountability, no sense of duty to the nation (or community or world)."

http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/04/22/bill-black-interview-the-great-global-bank-robbery-part-2-10008/


Where is the investigation, where is the FBI, why are there 1/6 the number of FBI agents dealing with this crisis when compared to the S+L crisis, this crisis is 30+ times larger? Why is not one of these elite asshole bankers, including Geithner and Summers, being perp walked on national tv to show the American people that this problem is being cleaned up not to mention the deterrent factor. We won't recover until we get rid of the criminal filth that infest both the financial sector and the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. William Black on control fraud.
Originally posted by Ozymandius in this mornings SMW thread.

It all goes back to the University of Chicago, and the Olin Foundation. A must read.


http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/08/william-black-theoclassical-law-and-economics-makes-the-law-an-ass.html

(snip)


The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision allows businesses to make unlimited political contributions to judges and politicians. When judges are elected, the need for these contributions inherently turns judges into politicians. Sympathetic judges are corrupt businesses’ most valuable allies. Corporations and their senior officials can commit civil or criminal wrongs with impunity if their case is assigned to a friendly judge. The Robber Barons often had judges on their payrolls. Judges can serve a corporation as both a shield and a sword. They can declare statutes and regulations unlawful. They can issue favorable decisions when corporations sue their critics, which can intimidate, tie up, or even bankrupt the critics.

The fact that corporations are “investing” so heavily in getting pro-business judges elected demonstrates that their CEOs believe that the election of friendly judges will increase their incomes and decrease the risk that they will ever be sanctioned. It’s a business decision – not a decision based on which judicial candidate would be more qualified or better serve justice. CEOs want to win cases when doing so would be unjust and contrary to the law, which is why they hire top attorneys and make the contributions necessary to elect judges they believe will be allies. The empirical evidence in Texas shows that judicial elections and contributions produces perverse dynamics. One study showed that hiring the former law firm of a Texas Supreme Court justice markedly increased the chances that the Texas Supreme Court would exercise its discretion and hear your appeal from an adverse decision. Hiring the former law firm of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court produced an even greater chance of having one’s appeal heard.

Yves noted that the Chamber of Commerce was leading the effort to elect CEO-friendly judges. The Chamber is one of the points of intersection in the discussions about electing judges and whether law and economics has played a perverse role in causing catastrophic policy, regulatory, and judicial blunders. The Chamber distributed a plan for a hostile takeover of university departments of economics and finance (and the courts and the media) proposed by Lewis Powell (the soon to be Supreme Court Justice). Extremely conservative “law and economics” proved to be central to this effort. The law and economics movement began as a non-ideological approach to explaining and aiding judicial decision-making. The scholars leading the movement had diverse views. The Olin Foundation transformed law and economics into an ultra ideological field dominated almost exclusively by passionate opponents of government “interference” in “free enterprise.” Olin specialized in creating well-funded positions in academia for scholars that had an “Austrian” approach to economics. Austrian economics has, generally, become more extreme since its formative years when Hayek warned that mixed economies (e.g., the U.S. and Europe) were inevitably consigned to the Road to Serfdom. Here is how the National Review praised the Olin’s takeover of the field.

(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Predictable
This is why so many of us were screaming about the paucity of the stimulus package early on. The cheerleaders just poo pooed us, with their "something is better than nothing" mantra.

Sometimes that's simply not true. If we had tried for a bigger stimulus and had it blocked, then the short term pain might have been greater, but the rethuglicans would've been squarely to blame. Worst of all, the vast majority of "stimulus" were direct handouts to Wall Street "banks". Now, it's all blurred in the idiocracy's mind, and Dems, mostly Obama, is going to catch more than his fair share of blame.

Many of us saw this coming. Obama didn't. I think Obama just doesn't understand the depth of the right wing's hatred of him. They would do much more than cut their noses off to spite him. They'd destroy the country's entire economy just to blame it on the black man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. The stimulus legislation was essentially written by three Senate Republicans who designed it to fail

They cut, and cut and cut job creating proposals made by House Democrats and as if that wasn't enough drastically cut a few hundred billion dollars out of the total amount of money devoted to the package.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. The bubble has broken, and all the kings men and their stimuli cant put it together again.
Stimulus packages can only start a bubble and that's what it did. But it's too late for that. The stimulus money went to pay for the largest number of imports in 26 years. Didnt help our economy. Maybe China's.

The king's men, Summers, Moe, and Curly, will be looking to start a bigger bubble. I am afraid at Social Security's expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. Long live the economic recovery n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. What Recovery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. Im relieved.. its only a recession and not a depression..
whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. K+R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Squirrel Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. (Long live the Economic Recovery!) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kringle Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
40. we spend too much money overseas ,,nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Only a trillion or more for Iraq/Afghanistan wars. And more on the way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
42. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC