Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did Obama pick Rahm for his Chief of Staff?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:28 PM
Original message
Why did Obama pick Rahm for his Chief of Staff?
I've always thought it was because Rahm "knew the ropes" in Washington and in Congress. He knew how to "get things done".

Also, Obama was fairly new to Washington and needed someone to guide him past the pitfalls. What better person than one from his hometown of Chicago? He could trust him. He would watch his back.

And Rahm knew how to work with Congress. He could knock heads and get legislation passed.

But Rahm had visited Wall Street for a short time after his stint in Congress and made a good little mint in a very short time. He was partial to Wall Street. He was not their enemy.

So now he is the primary voice that the President listens to over all others, except maybe Bill Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rahm has the only remaining copy of Obama's original birth certificate.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seriously....I think they're friends. They've worked together...
and Rahm has experience stiff-arming Congress

That's why he picked the thug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think having a DLC gatekeeper was part of the price he had to pay
Edited on Sat Sep-04-10 03:34 PM by rocktivity
for getting Hillary to back down.

:tinfoilhat:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You're probably right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Bingo!
I've been saying that for months. I think this clown was forced on Obama.

But the fact that he's still there, after all the fuckups, is Obama's fault, nobody else's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. And Rahm was the worst possible choice he could have made.
Rahm is largely responsible for so many of the Blue Dogs being in Congress right now. Those very same Blue Dogs who have fought Obama it seems every step of the way. I guess they don't listen to Rahm now.

Big mistake, Barack. And we're all going to pay for it come November if you don't get your shit together...fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Exactly
The people Obama has chosen for his inner circle are not helping his image. There is an old axiom that you are judged by the company you keep, and the company he keeps sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. You got that partly right. Rahm is responsible for the Democratic majority.
Edited on Sat Sep-04-10 07:01 PM by KittyWampus
Along with the good work of Howard Dean.

But you go ahead and cling to your silly caricature and to heck with facts.

Someone once posted a list of the more liberal Dems Rahm helped get into Congress. But some DU'ers really are impervious to reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. No. LBJ knew how to get things done. Rahm knows how to break things.
He will be remembered for losing elections and for dividing the voting base. But that probably doesn't matter to him or his base, the corporati.

I wish we wouldn't rehash Rahm until December or so. I still need to work November.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You're probably right...
Sorry for bringing it up. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's probably me.
I need to scoot off to a hobby forum. You're fine, kentuck. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. He should have been rejected because he had a job that paid well?
I can think of a lot of reasons to dislike the man, but that's a bit nit-picky IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I don't think he made over a million dollars...?
by working hard on his job??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. We don't really have
a lot of information on this. No-one inside the administration talks to the media. We know less about the inner workings of the Obama crowd than any other administraton I can recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because that's the person he wanted
The thing to ponder is: now that you know Obama is not the person you were sold in the election, who is he really and what is he about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. To make him a one-term president?
Seriously. From day one, Rahm Emmanuel has been undermining the president, contradicting his public statements, actively alienating every segment of the president's base, and flogging a rabid pro-Wall-Street agenda that is not only bad policy, but bad politics in this environment. This is the president's "friend" and "political expert"? If I didn't know better, I'd think he was trying to sabotage the Obama administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. He wanted someone on the same wavelength?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
another saigon Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. yes indeed
the wave length we have no access to. We being the retarded, drug taking, professional left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. payback.. (how most administrations fill jobs) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. You think Obama listens to Clinton? I doubt that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC