Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In the Crystal Ball: More Regulation for Psychics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:14 AM
Original message
In the Crystal Ball: More Regulation for Psychics
Source: Time

Starting this week, fortune tellers in Warren, Mich., must be fingerprinted and pay an annual fee of $150 — plus $10 for a police background check — to practice their craft. The new rules are among America's strictest on palmists, fortune readers and other psychics, part of a growing push to regulate a business that has never been taken, or overseen, very seriously...

"We had no mechanism of enforcement to protect people against unsavory characters," Warren city-council member Keith Sadowski says. "We want to be sure there is some recourse in case we do get somebody who is not legitimate..."

Psychic Gina Marie Marks pleaded guilty Wednesday, Sept. 1, in Florida to grand theft and organized fraud. One of her victims testified that Marks swindled her out of $312,926.29 — and persuaded her to get a tattoo, to boot. It's now "a constant reminder of the psychological abuse I endured at the hands of this false prophet," she told a Broward County judge...



Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2015676,00.html?xid=rss-nation-yahoo#ixzz0yfPx0pj4



Enforcement would be very simple if every claimant had to pass a simple test of their "powers" in a controlled environment. e.g., James Randi's standing offer of $1 million for ANYONE demonstrating psychic powers.

Problem - the municipalities would never collect any money, since not one single self-proclaimed psychic has ever passed such a test.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think I saw the Marks woman on a crime TV show
she also made an old, sick man believe that, as long as he kept funneling money to her, she could keep him alive.

His wife only found out when a ton of money disappeared from their joint account. The wife DID make a fuss, since she was indignant and not embarrassed, like a lot of victims are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hey, thanks!
How did I miss that one? I'll watch out for it.

I'm a sucker for true-crime shows. And the shows about spouses knocking each other off for the insurance money get kind of boring, since I've seen so many of 'em...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm an atheist and I think psychics are a bunch of hooey
But they have a right to practice their "religion".

Charging people $150/year to exercise what should be a fundamental right is bullcrap.

If fraud is their concern they can keep a database with local criminal records just like everything else that doesn't cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gophates Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'd like to see that charge for all priests, ministers, and other purveyors of religious hooey.
You know, considering they're too important to be taxed like all other businesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Agreed
Regulations aren't going to protect people stupid enough to give their money to a psychic, or a TV preacher, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. being a con artist is not a religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. they should have seen this coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. i LOVE that sign,
"psychic fair cancelled due to unforeseen circumstances"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. DUzy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. apply the same test to christianity, and power of prayer.
then, I'd be very happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good. Useless filth will at least generate some city revenue. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is a good idea. Get rid of these conmen that prey on the gullible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Weed out tricksters"
...as opposed to all the LEGITIMATE psychics...

Um, right. :eyes:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC