Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Did Government Egg Graders Not Notice Contaminated Eggs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:54 AM
Original message
Why Did Government Egg Graders Not Notice Contaminated Eggs?
Why Did Government Egg Graders Not Notice Contaminated Eggs?


Inspectors working for the U.S. Department of Agriculture have come under scrutiny for not doing more to prevent the outbreak of salmonella at two Iowa egg processors that sold hundreds of millions of tainted eggs to stores and restaurants.

The Associated Press reported that two former workers at one of the egg farms told USDA inspectors about health concerns at the site, but were ignored. The two former workers of Wright County Egg facilities said they reported problems involving leaking manure and the presence of dead chickens. A USDA spokesman said the inspector at the Wright facility did not recall anyone raising concerns, and added that the inspectors’ job was to check eggs, not the surrounding farm. Inspectors spent 40 hours a week at Wright County Egg and Hillandale Farms.

However, USA Today reported that USDA regulations require buildings and “outside premises” to be free of conditions that harbor vermin.

Furthermore, officials from the Food and Drug Administration documented filthy conditions in and around barns where chickens laid eggs at the two Iowa companies.

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/Why_Did_Government_Egg_Graders_Not_Notice_Contaminated_Eggs_100905
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
gophates Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. More likely because they are overworked and understaffed
Because our corporate masters don't care if they poison and kill people as long as the money comes in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. They are - egg inspectors have to be in the candle rooms and packing plants
A handful of egg inspectors oversee the processing of millions of eggs per day at these facilities.

They don't have time to inspect production houses scattered all over the state.

teabaggin' nonsense

:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. LOL!!!111
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gophates Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. You said it, chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yeah - Jack DeCoster can inspect his eggs better than any pointy-headed bureekrat
and more efficiently too!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Actually it was a tad too "efficient"
Most plans to increase the "efficiency" of government since Reagan have involved staff cuts and faster throughput of whatever it is. Like review of oil well drilling applications. This is where "categorical exclusions" come from. With shorter and shorter manpower, you end up picking your targets carefully and putting the rest on ignore / rubber stamping lists, or you "exclude" them altogether. How closely and carefully do you think an inspector can look at 500 million eggs in a month or two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. The correct term is 'teabagger'. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. You want the companies to inspect their own eggs? Yeah,
that would work.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Oh no! Not pizza for breakfast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Yeah, that gubmint is so BAAAAD!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I'm confused.
Just who do you think should be inspecting our food supply if not the government?

Private industry does rather worse in situations like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Shhhh - Ayn Rand cannot be criticized
nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Because Bush administration hires are still in government
and they engage in acts of deliberate sabotage to make government look ineffective. You fell for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. per the article, the graders *did* report concerns. it was the upper echelons who failed.
because they're in bed with the profiteers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. because they're getting paid off by the corporations to not notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. When I worked for Jack DeCoster in ME, we had a heat wave that killed hundreds of thousands of hens
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 11:37 AM by jpak
The surviving hens just laid their eggs on the rotting feces-fouled carcasses of the dead hens - and egg collection went on as usual.

I spent weeks pulling half-mummified half-decaying dead hens from cages - and there was at least one dead hen per cage.

:puke:

This was business as usual at DeCoster operations

I am not surprised by these new reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Atlas shrugged n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Do you know anything at all about how Salmonella is detected in their egg screens
and what percentage of eggs are screen biochemically?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why don't people realize that eating eggs produced on an industrial scale
is inherently dangerous for the consumer and really nasty for the animals involved? There is simply no way to ensure cleanliness or food safety (not to mention humane husbandry, which I'll concede very few people even begin to give a fuck about) reliably in a factory farm environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Since the germs are invisible how could they know they are on
the eggs. What they should do is inspect the Hen Pens. After this outbreak they found all kinds of filth in these pens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. Regulatory Capture. Our agencies are run by industry hacks.
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 02:08 PM by Odin2005
This shit makes me more and more sympathetic to the Libertarian position (the REAL libertarians, not the Pukes that smoke pot), what use are regulatory agencies when they are corrupted by the industries they are supposed to control?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC