Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did the stimulus work?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 07:51 PM
Original message
Did the stimulus work?
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 07:52 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Did the stimulus work?

This is a question with some nuance to it. Work at what? What was it supposed to succeed in doing?

The stimulus validated Keynes pretty nicely. It did exactly what it was predicted to do. It did save millions of net jobs... for the time being, at least. It put a floor under GDP. We got a good quarter and two tolerable quarters ut of it. Psychologically that was quite important.

Unfortunately, as mentioned, the stimulus succeeded in doing exactly what it was predicted to do... that is, what was predicted by responsible economist types. And that's why some folks were screaming bloody murder that it was too small to do much. It's effects were calculable and we knew going into it that it wasn't going to do much to restore the economy to sustainable growth.

Was the objective of the stimulus to restore sustainable growth? If so it was a failure, but not a surprising failure.

Was the objective of the stimulus to temporarily brake the slide... a smoother glide path to a zero-growth new normal? If so, it succeeded. But if that was the objective then what was plan B?

There had to be a plan B, right?

Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was a collosal failure. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. fuck no
and it's readily apparent there is no PLAN B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Supposed there was no stimulus? Would we be better off?
What would have been the consequence of no stimulus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The stimulus prevented 13-14% unemployment (top-line # as measured)
The stimulus prevented a quarter or two of negative GDP growth which would have been devastating to expectations, hiring, private investment, inventories, etc.

Without the stimulus the new normal of fuckedness we are entering would have been normalized at an even lower level.

The stimulus was important.

It was not, however, enough to have any hope of restoring sustainable growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. pure speculation...13/14%? I don't know...and neither does anyone else...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Problem is it was sold with the premise we would not reach double digit unemployment.
So you are right that certain economists called it. But the pols over promised and underdelivered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. The stimulus worked
for those who found jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. The stimulas allowed the Corporations who pay no taxes....
To accumulate the largest cash reserve in history.

All he while... Americans are being evicted from their homes and treated like criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. It did not do what it was predicted to.
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 08:34 PM by sendero
... it was predicted to keep unemployment below 8%.

Please do no attempt to rewrite history.

That said, the stimulus helped, but it was simply not enough. And at this point I don't see the political will to do much more.

Other than a sort of backdoor stimulus in the form of bailouts of CA, IL, NY and a few other states that are essentially bankrupt. This stimulus will at least help a few state and local workers keep their jobs.

Obama's handling of the economy has been pathetic. And once you saw the morons and crooks he loaded his economic cabinet with, you couldn't really claim to be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Read harder or be less hostile, one or the other.
"... it was predicted to keep unemployment below 8%. Please do no attempt to rewrite history."

I am not rewriting history and if you read the OP for comprehension you would know that.

The 8% "prediction" was not a rigorous economic prediction, it was a political claim.

The OP refers to what modern economics predicted given the size and timing of the bill's provisions, not what some bozo in the administration claimed.

Who are you even snarking off on? I was most likely the biggest critic of the 8% claim on DU when it was first made because it was not true... it was not what was predicted by normal economic analysis of the question.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It was predicted by Obama's team..
Edited on Mon Sep-06-10 03:40 PM by sendero
. ostensibly with his concurrence. I stand by my objection.

Let me go further. It did not work because it was not nearly enough. To say that it was intentionally planned to not be enough is well, idiotic.

It was not enough because Obama and his illustrious team of banksters were concerned with the bank's health, not the economy's.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. at least as well as "the surge"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freetradesucks Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Every single last fucker that received stimulus funds to
stay afloat should have been allowed to sink.


This was the time to cull the herd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Funny, I heard a Tea Party, hardcore Republican make the same argument on the radio.
Everybody, big and small should have been allowed to fail. Let the whole economy crash and start over again is what he said should have been done. My guess is that he felt he was probably safe from any failure, but let the rest go down regardless of whether it was their fault or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freetradesucks Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Funny, almost everyone on this thread shares my sentiment...
except you. That's pretty funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Well, isn't that special. I bet your Mom is proud of you.
Wow, isn't that pretty funny. Unfortunately I won't be reading any more of your sentiments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freetradesucks Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Just out of curiosity, which right wing radio host
did you "happen" to be listening to at the time?

I'm sure you were either just flipping through the channels, or "keeping tabs" on the enemies talking points, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. A spectacular failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChoppinBroccoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, Let's Define Our Terms
Did the Stimulus work? Well, let's see. It was meant to STIMULATE the economy (tricky use of the verbiage here, I know, but do try to keep up). It did that. You see all the lines on all the economic graphs pointing in a positive direction immediately after its passage. So yes, it DID stimulate the economy. So I ask you, how can you sit here a year-and-a-half later, as the economy begins to SLOW (it hasn't even stopped growing yet--it's just growing more slowly than it did), and say that the stimulus was a failure?

That's like putting jumper cables on your car battery, starting your car, hearing it roar to life, removing the cables, driving 100 miles down the road, and having the car stall at a traffic light, and declaring that your jump-start was a failure. Uh, no, it did exactly what it was supposed to do. The rest was up to you. Particularly when your Republican passenger is constantly getting out of the car at every stop and pouring sugar into the gas tank, and then yelling, "SEE??? I TOLD you we never should have taken that jump!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. It wasn't big enough to do the job needed.
I hope this new initiative will be the rest of the stimulus...the part that the Admin. was too timid to do. I like it, and I hope to god it works the way it should -- putting people back to work and rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. It was too small.
WAY too small. It also didn't make stipulations for certain jobs to be kept in the US (BUY US).

So no, it didn't work. It may have slowed down the bleeding in some areas, but for most folks it just prolonged the suffering with smoke and mirrors. We won't know how ineffective it was for a few years, probably, when we can look back and see the numbers more accurately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC